Thadius
Posts: 5091
Joined: 10/11/2005 Status: offline
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPPLSHKH0h4 Obama's answer to the McCain ad. He lists 5 seperate sources with quotes and dates... with the caption John McCain Attacks on Barack Obama "not true" - MSNBC 07/28/08- I can't find anything from that date that states "not true" (perhaps there is something I am missing) "false" - Factcheck.org 07/28/08- used the word to describe the claims about wanting to bring press, http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/snubbing_wounded_troops.html "baloney" -USA Today Editorial 07/29/08 - says that blaming Obama alone for gas prices is "baloney" -opinion piece quote:
http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2008/07/our-view-on-cam.html#more Even by the elastic standards of political ads, this is more than a stretch. It's baloney. It's also a marker on the path toward the kind of simplistic, counterproductive demonizing that many expect will poison the fall campaign "the low road" New York Times Editorial 07/30/08 -no surprise here- besides it is another opinion piece. Would be the same as using the words of Limbaugh to categorize Obama's message "baseless" - TIME 07/30/08 -there is no article with this date, the closest thing is an article from 07/31/08 discussing the "McCain Anti-Celebrity Storyline" (that is the article title) and the word baseless doesn't appear in it. http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1828111,00.html Somehow the Obama campaign did miss this quote in the article that discussed McCain's ads... quote:
It is an argument that amounts to this: Barack Obama is a huge phenomenon, but he does not have the experience, or the judgement, to lead the country. In fact, he is just another polictician, an empty suit, who will do whatever he needs, and make as many vague but eloquent speeches as he has to, to get elected. John McCain, on the other hand, is a proven, principled leader you already know. Anyways, I was curious in reading the articles in which those statements were made, or seeing the context in which it was stated. Only 3 of the 5 sources are accurate. The ad continuously pops up a picture of McCain with Bush, and concludes the negative portion with "Same old Politics, Same Failed Policies". The curious part to me in this part of the presentation is Obama suggesting that associations are fair game? I wonder how an ad showing Obama with Ayers with talks of how Ayers wanted to bring about change, with a tagline of "That is change we can do without", would be received. Just a quick thought that came to mind. This is shaping up to be a nasty campaign season, from both sides. I think we are just seeing the tip of the iceburg, and the honesty of both campaign ads are going to be "bordering on reality". Let's keep it civil, and discuss the issues, because the campaigns certainly are going to be getting off of them in the weeks and months to come. Looking forward to some discussions on why these ads are bad for either candidate, or why you believe they will gain traction. Thadius
_____________________________
When the character of a man is not clear to you, look at his friends." ~ Japanese Proverb
|