RE: Positive Images (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress



Message


cloudboy -> RE: Positive Images (2/4/2010 8:54:44 AM)


quote:

Is it androgynous, or simply not stereotypically masculine in the way that sex-negative culture embodies masculinity? That's something worth thinking about.

Does it make a man less masculine, less male, to be eye candy? If you do believe, that, why do you think it's true? I suspect we're back to the same formula of having to be female (or at least not male) in order to be thought of as pretty, sexy, desirable, fuckable, or hot in that piece-of-meat eye-candy way that says sexual objectification.

Androgyny can be hot, don't get me wrong. But it's also hot to be all male and beautiful, sexually displayed and objectified for our viewing pleasure. Gay male porn does it best, but I'd really like to see a lot more examples of this dynamic in femdom culture.


Well, just to be unscientific about it. Wilborn hates figure skating and is turned off by Weir, he's a guys guy. Kornheiser's more the geek, English major, not athletic, extremely verbal, and obviously kinky --- and he loves Weir and figure skating. Beyond them, a lot of guys would off-hand dismiss Weir as a Fag.

When males have a dancer's body - thin, muscular, supple -- and that's combined with grace and style -- you have something that combines the two genders in one. Unlike some sports, dance, ballet, and figure skating are international and cut across all cultural landscapes -- so I think we can look to its participants for archetypes of beauty and self expression.





LaTigresse -> RE: Positive Images (2/4/2010 8:58:16 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy


PTI's Kornheiser and Wilborn called attention to figure skater, Johnny Weir, and I guess if anyone was going to fit the description of a male "diva" he might be it. His photos are especially easy on the eye, tasteful, AND he's blessed with a figure that cuts both ways.....

Take a look at his website.

http://www.figureskatersonline.com/johnnyweir/gallery_08bangs.html


I guess it's no surprise that the boy does nothing for me personally but I swear they borrowed my horse Maj for that photo shoot!




LadyNTrainer -> RE: Positive Images (2/4/2010 9:11:40 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy
When males have a dancer's body - thin, muscular, supple -- and that's combined with grace and style -- you have something that combines the two genders in one.


.....are you saying that men can't be muscular, supple and graceful, and have style without becoming wholly or partly feminine?

IMO, this is one of those places where the (male) dominant cultural and religious paradigm has crept so subtly into the dark crevices that you don't even know it's there.

I don't know the individual under discussion well enough to say whether his grace is purely masculine or whether he is more androgynous.  I haven't seen him move, for example.  But it is entirely possible for a male creature who is slim, supple, tautly muscled and as graceful as a stalking tiger to be completely masculine and also completely beautiful, without borrowing anything from femininity at all.




AAkasha -> RE: Positive Images (2/4/2010 9:34:49 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyNTrainer

I don't know the individual under discussion well enough to say whether his grace is purely masculine or whether he is more androgynous.  I haven't seen him move, for example.  But it is entirely possible for a male creature who is slim, supple, tautly muscled and as graceful as a stalking tiger to be completely masculine and also completely beautiful, without borrowing anything from femininity at all.



Professional swimmers, cyclists have very lean, tight bodies.  Nothing feminine about them or their capabilities.

Akasha




pyroaquatic -> RE: Positive Images (2/4/2010 9:42:16 AM)

I'm sorry if I do not fit within the specifications of what people want. I am what I am. Take it or leave it.

Even positive images can be spun negatively, as people have preferences.




SolangeRichards -> RE: Positive Images (2/4/2010 9:43:31 AM)

I'm going to agree with you.

While I understand what cloudboy is saying, and I certainly think that he is right, about Johnny Weir, the fact is that many men have the type of build he is talking about yet they are completely masculine with no trace of the feminine whatsoever.

There are countless boxers, martial artists, jockies, swimmers and dancers etc who read totally male while still having a thin, muscular and supple body

I guess it depends on the guy




LadyNTrainer -> RE: Positive Images (2/4/2010 10:02:23 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pyroaquatic

I'm sorry if I do not fit within the specifications of what people want. I am what I am. Take it or leave it.


Hell, if you were within reach, I'd definitely hit that.  [:D]




pyroaquatic -> RE: Positive Images (2/4/2010 10:31:48 AM)

And since your intelligence is 'off the hook' I would totally melt. Brainium Cranium escaping from the asylum.

Set and Setting can net fretting or guessing, deflection and tension.

Actually, there are lots of intelligent ladies here that would make me melt into a puddle inspired by awe.




cloudboy -> RE: Positive Images (2/4/2010 10:48:08 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SolangeRichards

I'm going to agree with you.

While I understand what cloudboy is saying, and I certainly think that he is right, about Johnny Weir, the fact is that many men have the type of build he is talking about yet they are completely masculine with no trace of the feminine whatsoever.

There are countless boxers, martial artists, jockies, swimmers and dancers etc who read totally male while still having a thin, muscular and supple body

I guess it depends on the guy



Right, this could be an endless conversation. Lean, agile, able to do much with one's body : contort, pirouette, bend, hold positions, etc. That physical agility and body type -- is quite versatile. I would also argue that the "training" of dancers and figure skaters differs from other athletes. The aim is for beauty of movement and appearance, wonder of agility and grace. These traits all arguably lean toward the "feminine" while also being socially attractive and acceptable (although some would still hate the idea of "masculine" compromise here.)




pyroaquatic -> RE: Positive Images (2/4/2010 10:56:20 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: SolangeRichards

I'm going to agree with you.

While I understand what cloudboy is saying, and I certainly think that he is right, about Johnny Weir, the fact is that many men have the type of build he is talking about yet they are completely masculine with no trace of the feminine whatsoever.

There are countless boxers, martial artists, jockies, swimmers and dancers etc who read totally male while still having a thin, muscular and supple body

I guess it depends on the guy



Right, this could be an endless conversation. Lean, agile, able to do much with one's body : contort, pirouette, bend, hold positions, etc. That physical agility and body type -- is quite versatile. I would also argue that the "training" of dancers and figure skaters differs from other athletes. The aim is for beauty of movement and appearance, wonder of agility and grace. These traits all arguably lean toward the "feminine" while also being socially attractive and acceptable (although some would still hate the idea of "masculine" compromise here.)


Explosive Power and Endurance plays a HUGE role. You are forgetting those two elements. Engender what you wish. As naming is the particular origin of all things...

...and you have named it so. It is true to you, not to others-like myself.




LadyNTrainer -> RE: Positive Images (2/4/2010 9:08:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy Lean, agile, able to do much with one's body : contort, pirouette, bend, hold positions, etc. That physical agility and body type -- is quite versatile. I would also argue that the "training" of dancers and figure skaters differs from other athletes. The aim is for beauty of movement and appearance, wonder of agility and grace. These traits all arguably lean toward the "feminine" while also being socially attractive and acceptable (although some would still hate the idea of "masculine" compromise here.)


....but my entire point is that these traits are *not* intrinsically either masculine or feminine, and part of what is fundamentally bad and broken about stereotypical femdom is that there are no good models of male beauty and grace in submission. 




GloriousMorning -> RE: Positive Images (2/5/2010 2:29:39 PM)

I was also going to reply in the locked thread, some really great thought provoking material there! Sorry cloudboy, if I take this in a different direction than what you had intended here.

I have been known to desire a man to wear Ladies underwear, but that is simply because I like the control of having him wear my panties, and I find them by far sexier on my man than the FTL's he might typically wear. I personally, don't find androgyny or feminized men that hot. I like a partner who embraces his masculinity and who understands that I want a man, not a girl or a man who looks like they could be one (could be that man-hair fetish of mine at play too).

I agree with the assessment that femininity is not an inherantly submissive trait, and I also don't feel that I need to penetrate him to order to feel Dominant. Strap on sex for me is about making love to my partner, isn't about becoming masculine or feminizing my partner in order to make him feel more submissive. I derive a great amount of pleasure in simply pleasing my partner through anal play. I feel a great sense of power, considering I am controlling my partners reception of pleasure and how indirectly or directly they are to receive it. Perhaps I am not of the norm, but even as a Dominant, I enjoy giving my partner pleasure, and realise that it is not *nearly* all about me and my pleasure. I'd also like to add that while I am engaging in strap on sex, I do feel a great amount of pleasure. I've physically orgasmed numerous times while using that little toy, simply from the impact upon my pubis and clitoris.

So, in summary, I find the assessment that men must be feminine in order to be more submissive or attractive, a fallacy :P




dreamerdreaming -> RE: Positive Images (2/23/2010 3:03:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: OttersSwim


if people want positive images of a gender bending, dead sexy Diva, ya' just have ta'  perv ME!  [;)]



*pervs otter*


Edited to add: wait- what locked thread?  [8|]

[:D]




Madame4a -> RE: Positive Images (2/23/2010 4:23:41 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tantriqu

Yup, I'm with Queen Rah [sm=highfive.gif], so if the OP has a question to Mistresses, then ask away.

Answers include:
Most straight lifestyle Dommes don't find androgyny or crossdressing attractive: see multiple threads on how we're not interested in men who are most interested in their own fetishes.

these three things don't go together, you're comparing apples with kiwis and then bananas... *heh* ... androgyny rarely has much to do with crossdressing and then the two don't always go with men most interested in their own fetishes.. and in the end, aren't most people, MOST interested in their own stuff?  nothing wrong with that.. its putting them above a potential dominant's fetishes that the trouble comes...

Weir isn't attractive, and his icedancing isn't hot.

He is to some, including me and frankly my tastes in men usually run to big burly bald guys in uniform.. but hey.. I still like him.. and he's not an ice dancer, he's actually a figure skating and he's quite good.. he was in the Olympics ya know...

Go rent 'Slap Shot' to see what is attractive to women in Olympic Winter sports: Paul Newman, and Michael Ontkean stripping on ice [best sports movie ever, and written by a woman!].

Why does a movie, one movie, tell you what is attractive to women in OWS?  ... I just don't get how one movie speaks for all women...

So sure, gay guys can be hot [Rupert Everett in 'An Ideal Husband' in the bathhouse comes to mind], and we tend to LOVE gay porn [two hot guys, one or both being penetrated? sweet!] but Weir? Eww!

your mileage may vary







Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125