Musicmystery
Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
For one I said certain people. You chose to respond. For two, I wasn't responding to you. Have a nice cup of chamomile. And yes, the person to whom I was responding quite clearly claimed, "all things constant," that inflation was solely a function of the money supply. It isn't, and reasons why not already provided. I think he may be misunderstanding Milton Friedman, who did preach that inflation is always a monetary phenomenon, and made a good case for it--but that's NOT the same as saying inflation is always a function of the money supply. MV = PQ. And coming through a jobless recovery, velocity isn't likely to be constant, while quantity takes time to recovery (first we exhaust existing inventory). Those factors are deflationary. Where a lot of confusion arises is that inflation measures are broad based, and while they reflect overall levels, they do not accurately reflect individual impact (part of what I raised in the other thread about individual vs. aggregate decisions). For example, I live in the country, my home is paid for, I have most of what I need, and consequently, my main expenditures are gasoline, heating fuel, and produce. Since petroleum prices have risen sharply in the past decade, I feel this increase intensely (even with good fuel efficiency in both my car and home), and had to change my financial planning to reflect it (also a factor in deciding to develop my own orchards and gardens). But that doesn't mean the country is facing 30% inflation (hypothetically, to illustrate), just because I'm hit where my money goes. At the same time, it does show why farmers are being hit especially hard.
< Message edited by Musicmystery -- 1/18/2011 8:37:07 AM >
|