xssve
Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DesFIP quote:
ORIGINAL: GreedyTop That then begs the question: how are you defining normal? Obviously he's defining it as anyone who doesn't have what he has, a relationship that doesn't satisfy him because he's got too many issues to have a healthy, mutually satisfactory one. Basically he's defining normal as being abnormal. I don't know about the rest of you folks, but I'm done feeding this troll. Phil, nobody can resolve your mixed emotions for you, that's reality, holographic projection or otherwise. If you're trying to make it logical, you're pissing up a rope: emotion is not logic, it isn't required to display consistency, one can and does often entertain two completely opposite emotions, and it doesn't make either of them any less valid, you can do that because it's not... logic. To satisfy emotions, you have to satisfy them or learn to live with not having them satisfied, that's it, and although you may employ logic to this end, the end result need not be logical from any external point of view, because it reflects a subjective existential, hermetic, emotional need - even if the need is to put your emotions on the back burner.
< Message edited by xssve -- 5/27/2011 6:19:46 AM >
|