quote:

Republican Base No Different Than Casey Anthony Jury?

quote:

ORIGINAL: HeatherMcLeather

quote:

Republican Base No Different Than Casey Anthony Jury?

So they are conscientious upholders of the law who don't allow themselves to be swayed by emotion?

quote:

ORIGINAL: HeatherMcLeather

quote:

Republican Base No Different Than Casey Anthony Jury?

So they are conscientious upholders of the law who don't allow themselves to be swayed by emotion?

quote:

ORIGINAL: HeatherMcLeather

quote:

Republican Base No Different Than Casey Anthony Jury?

So they are conscientious upholders of the law who don't allow themselves to be swayed by emotion?

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

It is not "emotion" when one states the obvious fact that the Republican party looks on the richest 2% of Americans as their true base....and treats the remaining fools who vote for them as their bitches of convenience !
Why the bitches do not realize that they are being screwed on a regular basis is beyond me.....though from what I have seen from the likes of sub rob,locked and sanity I am leaning towards a pronounced lack of intelligence excacberated by a hatred for that spurious entity known as "others"
So very fucking sad.

quote:


Heber Springs, Ark. — Some time ago a western movie portrayed a bunch of outlaws who botched up every attempt to pilfer money.  They were known as the “Gang That Couldn’t Shoot Straight”.  Today we have their soul mate in the Obama administration.  That western gang couldn’t hit a barn door in front of them, but at least they didn’t look down the barrel of their own pistol to determine why it misfired.
In his desperate attempt to find a villain that everybody would hate, Obama decided he has a real winner if he could combine big corporations and big Republican bankers.  As President Obama said in January, “I didn’t take this job to look after fat-cat bankers”.  As so often the case his team of inept researchers and advisors failed to determine who put him in power and who has been backing his socialistic programs.  Who but fat-cat Democrat bankers.
Consider this chart that shows who backed Obama and the Democrat congress and whose actions they now disapprove:

2008 Contributions to Federal Candidates
From Employees and PACS

                                Democrats      Republicans
Goldman Sachs            77%                 23%
Citigroup                       65%                 35%
J.P. Morgan Chase       63%                 37%
Morgan Stanley            57%                 43%
Bank of America           59%                 41%

quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967

quote:


Heber Springs, Ark. — Some time ago a western movie portrayed a bunch of outlaws who botched up every attempt to pilfer money.  They were known as the “Gang That Couldn’t Shoot Straight”.  Today we have their soul mate in the Obama administration.  That western gang couldn’t hit a barn door in front of them, but at least they didn’t look down the barrel of their own pistol to determine why it misfired.
In his desperate attempt to find a villain that everybody would hate, Obama decided he has a real winner if he could combine big corporations and big Republican bankers.  As President Obama said in January, “I didn’t take this job to look after fat-cat bankers”.  As so often the case his team of inept researchers and advisors failed to determine who put him in power and who has been backing his socialistic programs.  Who but fat-cat Democrat bankers.
Consider this chart that shows who backed Obama and the Democrat congress and whose actions they now disapprove:

2008 Contributions to Federal Candidates
From Employees and PACS

                                Democrats      Republicans
Goldman Sachs            77%                 23%
Citigroup                       65%                 35%
J.P. Morgan Chase       63%                 37%
Morgan Stanley            57%                 43%
Bank of America           59%                 41%

http://www.thesuntimes.com/opinions/columnists/x692839122/Fat-cat-democrat-bankers

quote:

You think this chart proves something? What exactly do you think it proves?

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967

quote:


Heber Springs, Ark. — Some time ago a western movie portrayed a bunch of outlaws who botched up every attempt to pilfer money.  They were known as the “Gang That Couldn’t Shoot Straight”.  Today we have their soul mate in the Obama administration.  That western gang couldn’t hit a barn door in front of them, but at least they didn’t look down the barrel of their own pistol to determine why it misfired.
In his desperate attempt to find a villain that everybody would hate, Obama decided he has a real winner if he could combine big corporations and big Republican bankers.  As President Obama said in January, “I didn’t take this job to look after fat-cat bankers”.  As so often the case his team of inept researchers and advisors failed to determine who put him in power and who has been backing his socialistic programs.  Who but fat-cat Democrat bankers.
Consider this chart that shows who backed Obama and the Democrat congress and whose actions they now disapprove:

2008 Contributions to Federal Candidates
From Employees and PACS

                                Democrats      Republicans
Goldman Sachs            77%                 23%
Citigroup                       65%                 35%
J.P. Morgan Chase       63%                 37%
Morgan Stanley            57%                 43%
Bank of America           59%                 41%

http://www.thesuntimes.com/opinions/columnists/x692839122/Fat-cat-democrat-bankers

You think this chart proves something? What exactly do you think it proves?

Did you notice how this includes all donations from all employees? That includes all the $5 and $10 donations bank tellers etc. made. If you limit it to VP and equivalent ranked employees you will find a very different story and if you examine the same data in 2010... oh wait you can't since Citizens United. Wonder who had hundreds of millions of dollars to give to super PACS?

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

Fargle, I don't think it makes any differance anymore.
Obama has lost the Senior vote, the Veteran's vote, and the Independant's vote and you can't win without anyone of those groups.
I'm sure that the N.Y. Times could hire Jason Blair back and make a poll saying that all those groups are "for" Obama but it's not going to do any good.
The year 2012 will certainly be a year of "change."

quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967

quote:

ORIGINAL: HeatherMcLeather

quote:

Republican Base No Different Than Casey Anthony Jury?

So they are conscientious upholders of the law who don't allow themselves to be swayed by emotion?

Exactly[:D]
"Bill Maher, brought to you by the liberal left, remember, feel, don't think, because your government is here to take care of you."

quote:

Obama has lost the Senior vote, the Veteran's vote, and the Independant's vote and you can't win without anyone of those groups.

quote:

ORIGINAL: erieangel

If you're a working class American who still votes Republican, you are voting against your own interests.