Ishtarr -> RE: Rape & BDSM community... (3/27/2012 1:17:16 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: SailingBum quote:
ORIGINAL: LoreBook You said no and he did it anyway, that's all that's needed to constitute rape. You were raped, that it was gentle or even pleasant doesn't change anything, you were raped. What you do about it from here is up to you. Dunno If she was raped....Why did she continue to see him??? You need more than he said she said to "prove rape" and I suspect his version of event might be slightly different. BadOne I agree with this, especially seeing that she didn't even start to think of herself as raped until several other people heard her side of how she now relays the story and brought up rape. She didn't feel raped as the events occurred and continued to see him for months. Only after breaking up again, after telling a story to strangers in a certain way while already having negative feelings about the breaking, only after those strangers bring up rape... she starts feeling as if she was raped... that doesn't sound to me like it was indeed black and white nonconsensual. I'm not suggesting that he necessarily didn't rape her, but from what she's saying here, there is no real evidence that he did. It's very likely that if you hear his side of the story, you'll get a completely different version of the facts, and a whole bunch of items she left off that make it questionable whether she really wasn't consenting. For example AND I'M NOT SAYING THIS IS WHAT HAPPENED TO THE OP: Woman goes over to man's house feeling vulnerable. She drinks. He starts touching with her. She immediately and openly returns his touch. Kissing him, and undressing him as he starts to undress her. She then pauses and says: "no, I really shouldn't do this" but immediately continues to kiss, caress and undress him. He proceeds to kiss, caress and touch her, and pulls her close to initiate sex. She shifts in position to make access to her easier and returns his actions. Now, that's a fucking blurry situation. Was she or was she not raped? She said "no" sure, but she reacted contrary to what she said and initiated things at least in part herself. People say stuff in bed all the time. Simple stating "no" isn't always clear, and isn't always enough, ESPECIALLY not when a woman says "yes" every other way imaginable. Now if a guy has got half a brain, he CHECKS and double checks with a woman who has made the SMALLEST verbal expression that MAY indicate she may not want to have sex, just to make sure that he's not going to get a rape charge for her changing her mind afterwards because of what somebody else who only heard one side of the story said. If there is the least bit of doubt, a smart guy won't go near a woman, even if she does want to have sex, or acts in every way like she does. However, being an idiot doesn't make a guy a rapist. And several months later, after telling half a side of things to strangers who peer pressure you into believing it was rape EVEN when your initial reaction to their assertion it was rape is to FEEL that didn't happen, changing your mind doesn't make a guy a rapist. A woman who gets rapes feels deeply and intrinsically violated by that act. Having a several month relationship with a man after he supposedly raped you; and having as an initial reaction to outsiders crying rape the feeling that that's not what happened, doesn't point to her actually feeling violated on any level by him during the event. How can something be rape when she's conscious, lucid, past the age of consent AND she never even feels like anything at all is wrong?
|
|
|
|