Sicarius
Posts: 180
Joined: 2/26/2007 From: New Orleans Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: RobertCloud Actually, I suspect that if men were the ones that were designed to be pregnant that we would not carry babies a full nine months. The babies birth would occur within weeks of conception and then it would probably crawl into a pouch similar to what happens to a Kangaroo. For a man could not handle the stretching of his member to that size. However, a secondary tube allowing a smaller size of about a Joey, might be possible. Humans would be more Marsupial in nature. And a Man would probably carry the child in his pouch until the child was not just the normal 9 months gestation, but an additional year or so along. This would probably be a total of about 20 to 21 months of actual age since birth, but the equivalent of a year now. Heh. Well, I guess a kangaroo pouch is a little better than an exploded member ... and would such a thing suddenly make "pot bellies" more appealing to the fairer of the species, suggesting that we were prospectively succesful mates? lol -Sicarius
_____________________________
"All warfare is based on deception. Hence, when able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must seem inactive; ... Hold out baits to entice the enemy. Feign disorder, and crush him." -Sun Tzu, "The Art of War"
|