minnetar
Posts: 1272
Joined: 4/11/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyEllen Right. I'm English, so bugger the dictionary or any professor! Ignore the Queen, or any other authority. Aint, is a word. As are the regional variations used in my area - "ay" and "en" as in "You are not going to catch fish in the canal" "Yo ay gunna catch fish in the cut" or "You en gunna catch fish in the cut" The English that is in the dictionary, and formalised in grammar books and so on, is a recent invention. The same process of standardisation occurred in every European language I can think of. The purpose of the standardisation was to provide an agreed, mutually intelligible form for the language, for use both within the population speaking varieties of it and for the purposes of contacts external to that population in other countries. Thus, the only artificial or false English, is that to be found in the dictionary, "proper" pronunciations and in the grammar books. It is a contrived form to fulfil its purpose. It does this job well, but it isnt a real form of the language, and its importance for this purpose is lessening as more of us get to hear, through TV and radio etc, how other speakers use English and get used to their pronunciation and word usage, and understand what theyre saying. Its a living language too, and every year they add new words to the dictionaries to take account of this, dropping older forms no longer in use. If it were meant to be that English was static, then we'd all still be speaking something between German, Dutch and Danish with maybe a few Romano-Welsh bits thrown in. E lol dang the English even think it is a word even though i don't. minnetar
|