maybemaybenot
Posts: 2817
Joined: 9/22/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyEllen So, would you prefer to have an assisted death at your request should you be terminally ill? Or would you prefer to suffer a prolonged death in pain? Neither. These are not the only two choices when it comes to a terminal illness. My personal choice would be a dignified, pain free death. This is quite possible with the right care and the right health care practitioners. A dignified, pain free or minimal pain death may have what they call a " double effect" and that is quite acceptable to me. Double effect basically means that the medication/treatments primary intention is to ease pain/symptoms, but that in the course of relieveing symptoms a secondary effect < death> may occur or be hastened. Double effect: http://www.mywhatever.com/cifwriter/library/eperc/fastfact/ff08.html I am quite frimly against physician assisted suicide for many reason. If, however, some one choses to end their own life due to terminal illness, I respect that choice. The ramifications and debate over physician assited suicide is too vast to discuss here < for me>, but let me share a report with you all that may show you the direction physician assisted suicide has taken in the pioneer country of assisted suicide: Holland. The report is a few years old, but things haven't changed, only gotten broader and many original supporters are changing their minds. http://www.internationaltaskforce.org/fctholl.htm One of the many followup to this report: http://www.internationaltaskforce.org/iua24.htm#47 Dutch euthanasia doctors having second thoughts According to a recent Dutch newspaper article, doctors who were "the vanguard of the euthanasia practice" are now regretting earlier decisions to euthanize patients. These are not just ordinary doctors. These are the specially trained euthanasia consultants who give the second opinions required by law before patients’ lives are terminated. At a recent gathering of these consultants, family doctor Joke Groen-Evers announced, "Look here, I have a statement to make. When I started on euthanasia, I got hold of the wrong end of the stick. So I am going to stop as a euthanasia counselor. I cannot in all conscience accept the responsibility any longer. The law requires us to explore all avenues before we give euthanasia. But I see now that this happens only too infrequently." Most of the euthanasia consultants who were present indicated agreement. "Ignorance and lack of awareness have caused people to be flushed into the euthanasia procedure to whom a whole lot of life quality could be offered," said Dr. Ruben S. Van Coevorden. "When one has been so intently focused on euthanasia, one develops a blind spot for other possibilities," commented Dr. Willem Budde. "There are some who died through euthanasia that now make me realize that, with my present knowledge, things would have gone a very different way." They all agreed that little was known about pain and symptom control (palliation) in the Netherlands. Euthanasia had become THE solution to patient suffering. As a result, there were very few hospice programs compared to other countries.. But now, family doctors have started working in "palliation peer groups." There are 25 such groups, each with more than 130 doctors. "It seems as if among family doctors a counter-movement against euthanasia is forming," said Dr. Bernardina Wanrooij, who provides all the peer groups with material on palliative care. "[Euthanasia] is not really necessary any longer at all," explained Dr. Van Coevorden. "Patients let themselves be influenced far more than their physicians realize. You mention euthanasia, they ask for it. And if you mention palliative care, that’s what is going to be." She used to perform euthanasia twice a year. "Over the past three years," she added, "I have had requests for euthanasia, but, thanks to my knowledge of palliative care, I have not had to give euthanasia once." These days Dr. Van Coevorden tells patients, "I respect your wish for euthanasia, but would you allow me to alleviate your pain first?" "And very often nothing ever comes of the euthanasia," she added. "I do not mean to seem proud, but palliative care gives me back the confidence that had been much on the wane of late." said Dr. Budde. "It is a way of saying no to a demand for euthanasia. To say no, and yet have something to offer." Budde remembers the beginning years of euthanasia. "There you were, out on the streets with your euthanasia bag; it hàd something: a mixture of caring and power. But that vanguard feeling has certainly gone now." "Maybe it has to do with one’s age," Budde explained. "I am fifty-three now: Then you begin having other thoughts about death. Would I want euthanasia? No." [Oostveen, "Regrets: Champions of euthanasia practice are having second thoughts," NRC Handelsblad, 11/10/01. Translated.] mbmbn
< Message edited by maybemaybenot -- 5/17/2007 11:41:19 PM >
|