Politesub53 -> RE: Old Ownership marks ? (6/1/2007 4:38:41 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyDominaX quote:
ORIGINAL: thetammyjo Honestly I'd want to know why someone who was permentantly marked wasn't currently with their previous owner. If it is because of death, then I'd be cool with them keeping the marks as a nice reminder. If it was just because things fell apart, I'd wonder why they still had the marks at all. I'd also wonder what made them feel that permenant marks were an appropriate idea and then decide that the relationship was over. Permenant marks are something I'd take more serious than a collar or a wedding ring because unlike an item they are not easily removed. That sums up my thoughts to a "T." Permanent markings are something that should be given a great deal of thought, not lightly gone in to. I agree Maam but sometimes things dont work out as hoped for.
|
|
|
|