welshwmn3
Posts: 126
Joined: 3/14/2006 Status: offline
|
In another post, somebody stated, "You say you dislike having responsibility. In the sense of being a slave rather than being a submissive, this would still fall in line. The more you submit, the more the 'owner' takes on as responsibility. At that point, without having to concern themself with 'self', all that is left to 'do' is to serve and obey. Simplistic? Perhaps, but I don't see the difference between the two as being much more complicated than that. A submissive (one that has one or more areas in their life in which they 'can't' or 'won't' submit) has to be protective of their 'areas' and be responsible for themselves in that way. A slave is freed from that." I started to respond to this there, but decided not to hijack the original poster's question. Why is it automatically assumed that because a person is a slave, that means they have no responsibility? I'm sure there are lots of submissives and/or slaves that, due to the relationship they have, are not allowed to do anything without permission. I know of submissives and/or slaves who have to ask their Masters/Mistresses for permission to get new items of clothing, or even to go to the bathroom. I'm NOT knocking the paremeters of their relationships. It's what works for them. However, there are many ways that individual people's relationships work out. Whether D/s or M/s or S/S (how does one signify switch/switch), or other power exchanges I don't know about. What works for one, or ten, or ten thousand relationships doesn't work for them all. The way I see it, the way it works in my relationship, is that the more I submit, the more I take on responsibility. If people know/when people find out that I am anybody's submissive or slave, my actions start to reflect more on my Sir/Master. The more I submit to him, and his will, the more my actions and words reflect on him. Within the confines of our power exchange, whatever I say and do can affect him in the local community. If I'm a brat, and people in the local community know that I am collared to him, they will expect him to make me behave. Even if I behave perfectly in private, if, in public, I am always disdainful of everybody, snapping people's heads off for no reason, and etc, and resist all of his actions at punishment, then he gets a reputation for not being able to control me, and if it goes on long enough, not being able to dominate any sub. Even if I am a collared slave, even if my servitude is so strict that I have to be hand fed whatever I get to eat every day and have to ask to go to the bathroom, I still have responsibility I cannot get out of. I guess I just don't understand the concept that slavery means there is no responsibility.
|