|
Termyn8or -> Personal reaction to terrorism (5/21/2007 6:50:37 AM)
|
If anyone out there reads slow, fine, I am writing slow. It is going to take time for me to find the right words. This after an email where I was trying to explain how I am, how my family is and how alot of my chosen family is. The point, and the resultant questions are not easy to express, but here goes.
I think what I am talking about is attitude, but not the attitude you take, the attitude you have. People think differently, and once you read me you might say "You can say thast again". I am extremely stoic and emotionally detachable, that might mean I am useful in a crisis, maybe not.
On 9/11, my response was "We spend HOW MUCH on defense ?".
The Murrah building in OKC, my Dad "WTF is a daycare center doing there ? To whip up the people if something happens". Do you realize what he insinuated there ? That the LEOs in that building used children as a shield. Unfortunately I agree.
Columbine (me) "You mean to tell me there is not one other MF in that building with a gun ? Damn, the clerk at the fuckin candy store is armed, and they send their kids there to the schools with no protection, yup, makes sense" (sarcastic yes).
VA Tech, same thing. If I had kids and sent them to school I would want competent adults armed there for such an occasion. After all my guns are there to protect them, so at school there should be guns.
Personally I would've body slammed that Chink into a wall, I might get a hole or two, but a moving target is harder to hit. I have been shot before, it is not fun, but if you got a crazoid over here you will probably get shot anyway. The thing that would spur me on is just a hint of confidence that others are not going to put up with this shit either. Even if I died trying, the others should be right behind me. You can't kill all of us.
And on TV, you get the guy's gun and hold him for the police ? Fuck That. I would use his own gun to start deboning his legs. I would shoot him up piece by piece. I would not stop until the cops got there, and then I would be sure to plant one between his eyes. But seeing the already extant bodies on the floor I would have no problem making him suffer.
And then there were two Blacks down south raped five people and killed four of them, execution style. The media does not report Black on Whit crime as much as other crime, for political reasons, but that is not the point. Dr. Pierce of the National Alliance made a point about the perps being animals etc., but he missed the point completely.
While it is not so bad that he countered the media bias, he missed the whole point. How do two guys, only one of them with a gun kill five people ? Are we that weak ? When they line the five of you up in a field and start shooting, what kind of stupidity makes the fifth person just sit there waiting to be shot ?
You NEVER let anyone take you anywhere against your will. I would say "Fuck you shoot me here", but they don't want to do that, they want a bit of privacy. Pierce made a big thing about race, but that is not the issue. Have we completely forgotten self preservation ? Are we that weak ?
OK, forget the bombings, there is not much you can do, but didn't anyone see those people walking into a school with an assault weapon ? Nobody is like Jimi Hendrix "Hey Joe, where you going with that gun in your hand ?".
This is all coming down to one thing, and in Terminator style I will get blunt about it. The strong survive. You are kneeling on the ground with four friends and they start killing them at the other end, you just stay put and wait your turn ?
People have been brainwashed to believe that they are incapable of defending themselves, or doing much else without the help of the government. They like it this way. They want us all defenseless, and having to turn to them for our very lives, so they can be the heroes. Some heroes.
They don't do anything right, and they do not want to. They give money to states for every prisoner they hold, and the give money to fight crime. They have actually achieved a situation where it behooves local law enforcement to lock up the innocent and let the guilty go free. That way you are collecting for a bunch of prisoners but still have a bunch of crime. Money, money, money.
As such, prosecutors now figure out in five seconds who they think did it and proceed to build a case against that individual. They ignore eveidence that points to any other perpetrator, and hides it from the defense. That is because their perfomance is rated by how many convictions they can get. It doesn't matter at all whether the prisoner is guilty or innocent, it is their job to put him in jail.
The state of Texas knowingly executed an innocent Man after the supreme court gave them the green light to do so. He had PROVEN his innocence, but the proof came too late. Your beloved President, as governor at the time refused to pardon him or even commute his sentence to life in prison, which would've given him time to get the story out and eventually get exonerated, proving the folly of the court system. Instead he is dead, and can't tell anyone anything.
Amma tellya, the worst terrorists in the world wear suits and ties, and go on TV and tell us how great things are. They tell us how WE are winning, when in fact it is THEY who are winning, and WE are losing. That is fact.
Feel free to hijack this thread, as long as it is something good.
T
|
|
|
|
