RE: Pat Buchanan vs Adolf Hitler (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


lockedaway -> RE: Pat Buchanan vs Adolf Hitler (5/23/2007 7:27:54 PM)

Oh!!!  Damn. Yeah...Narosky!  I'm sorry, I'm still a bit jet lagged.  Right...Narosky!  Vive La France!!!  Someone should start playing La Marsilleine.
Thanks Sanity, I can call them French fries again.




girl4you2 -> RE: Pat Buchanan vs Adolf Hitler (5/23/2007 7:29:29 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway

Geez...I don't even know what you are getting at.  The Protestants hated the Quakers and the Mormons were entirely outcast.  All distinctly American, right?  The Japanese were interned in camps during WWII, right?  Just about all groups coming to this country suffered a certain amount of prejudice and stigma.  But, as Buchannan said, they were educated the same, they listened to the same radio programs, they read the same papers, they watched the same news reels and these people were Americans.  Despite what they went through, they loved their country and wanted to fight for it even if other members of the military didn't want to fight beside them.  Do we have that esprit de' corps now?  (Holy shit...I hate it when I use French for anything!!!!)


what i was getting at is genocide (of the native americans and the irish by the british and americans, the armenians by the turks, the polish and jews by the germans) is far, far different than a bit of intolerance and outcasting. internment was wretchedly horrid, and i find no defense for it, but at least it wasn't out and out mass killing.

these people that pat was talking of did NOT listen to the same radio, tv, etc. many didn't even *own* tv's or have the money for movies to see newsreels. they had a far, far different life than what was on "happy days" and "the donna reed show." perhaps a good book about birmingham in 1963 would help to enlighten you. there are so many more examples.




farglebargle -> RE: Pat Buchanan vs Adolf Hitler (5/23/2007 7:30:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway

No...once again, you are wrong. I guess no one can speak plainly or simply enough for you. A person is in the country until he leaves or dies. That is simple enough, right?


But their ECONOMIC USEFULNESS is a different timespan, isn't it? Specifically, they are only USABLE AS A COMMODITY BY THE PEOPLE WHO BENEFIT FROM THEM, for the period of time where they stay off the radar.

In other words, the people who IMPORT THE LABOR by offering the jobs, only use the labor they imported until they either use them up by killing them, or maiming them on the jobsite, or they get picked up.

Let's say an off the books employee enters the country at the age of 15. They work for 10 years, then fall off a roof and have to stop working.

The company that imported him, made a profit by using him for those 10 years. They obtained a financial benefit from doing it.

And that is where their concern ends. He's not on the books, so they don't have to give a shit what happens to him, with respect to his ability to earn a living.

Then we have, what? 6 years to deport him, on the Public Tab.

Shouldn't that bill be going to their past employers?

quote:


That is the reality of the situation not the philosphical sophistry you try to engage in. I used YOUR OWN EXAMPLE about the guy that fell off of the roof and came into contact with medical service providers, etc. etc. Do you understand? Unlike the drug, the person will be around for, potentially, years and years and in that time they will be put in situations where, if our system was hitting on all eight, they would be deported.


Why? Doesn't the EMPLOYER *FIRST* have an obligation to that person to make them as Whole as possible. THEN he has to go. If he can't bribe his way in with the settlement money.

By allowing any injured worker to file a workmans comp claim, you remove that FINANCIAL BENEFIT from the Companies which promote this.





farglebargle -> RE: Pat Buchanan vs Adolf Hitler (5/23/2007 7:32:12 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle


quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

there are only three "races", Negroid, Mongoloid, Caucasoid.


I think many scientists are skeptical of the whole concept of 'race," though I don't have a source handy.


Like EVERY SINGLE PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGIST.

Race is a term which doesn't exist in the science of studying human beings. The "Fake Sciences" love it though.




Fargle, please relay that message to Mecha and "La Raza".
For whatever reason they seem to think that they are a seperate "race" and that somehow that should allow them to invade our country.


Political Action Groups have their own Political Message. By simply pointing out the Scientific inaccuracy of their statements, you do pretty much all you can.

As a Public service, let me add:

There is no Science in Scientology.




popeye1250 -> RE: Pat Buchanan vs Adolf Hitler (5/23/2007 7:33:52 PM)

Girl, I've heard all the old stories about Ireland.
My grandmother came from Moeville, Donegal, just down the road from Derry.
One time when she came back from Ireland in the 60's she had one of those big rubber bullets that the Brits used to shoot at the protesters!




girl4you2 -> RE: Pat Buchanan vs Adolf Hitler (5/23/2007 7:35:35 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway

Oh...and another thing.  I have never heard of anyone accusing the Irsish of working too hard. 


That's a joke, btw.

massacre is nothing to joke about, Sir, although i'm not familiar with the "Irsish" only the Irish. seems the ones that survived the trip over here were only too happy to work as hard as they could at jobs hardly anyone wanted. hmmmm sounds familiar in a vague sort of way. it got far too many of them killed outright.




lockedaway -> RE: Pat Buchanan vs Adolf Hitler (5/23/2007 7:36:57 PM)

Oh puuuuuleeeeaaase!  You know, there weren't radio programs for anyone during the Civil War and Blacks still wanted to fight.  What are you going to say, there weren't newspapers either?  Blacks wanted to fight in WWI, were there tv's for people then???  The answer, btw, is "No."  YES...Blacks read the same newspapers, went to the same movies and listened to the same radios irrespective of what your books about Birmingham say.  There were a great many poor whites that were in NO BETTER economic position then many southern Blacks.  Are you going to deny that?  The point is that anyone in the country during those times ingested their news, etc. from the same sources.  You seem to thrive on division and I have never heard anyone in the U.S. (except for libs in the last 20 years) take umbrage to being called distinctly American.




lockedaway -> RE: Pat Buchanan vs Adolf Hitler (5/23/2007 7:40:29 PM)

This post isn't even worthy of a response.  Someone who feels compelled to sarcastically correct your typos knows their argument is intellectually bankrupt.




farglebargle -> RE: Pat Buchanan vs Adolf Hitler (5/23/2007 7:44:41 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250
Girl, the U.S.....isolationistic? You're fucking kidding me right?
With Troops in more than 130 countries?
With U.S. Corporations in probably every country?
And as far as I know we of course don't support what's going on in the Sudan but it's not our job to fix it either.
We haven't had any period of isolationism in this country in 70 years now!
After these last two idiots in the W.H. ANY isolationism would be refreshing!!!



I think it is Isolationism. But in a weird way. Bush didn't care if he invaded Iraq all by himself. He got his boyfriend Tony to go along with it, and Poland, I guess I shouldn't neglect to mention Poland.

I got issues with *that*, but I'll reserve them for another time.





girl4you2 -> RE: Pat Buchanan vs Adolf Hitler (5/23/2007 7:45:12 PM)


when you can show me where a poor black family had the exact same experiences as a white one in the 1950's as inferred in the original quote, i'll consider that to be a rebuttal. to think otherwise as an idea just doesn't even get off the ground, much less fly. i suppose that's why the buchanans and falwells have such followings; it takes divine intervention to reach lofty posts.




girl4you2 -> RE: Pat Buchanan vs Adolf Hitler (5/23/2007 7:47:12 PM)

fast reply:
sheesh people, quit taking my green font!




farglebargle -> RE: Pat Buchanan vs Adolf Hitler (5/23/2007 7:47:33 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway

Oh puuuuuleeeeaaase! You know, there weren't radio programs for anyone during the Civil War and Blacks still wanted to fight.


Plenty didn't. Especially since it wasn't about Slavery at all until Lincoln played the Race Card.

quote:


What are you going to say, there weren't newspapers either? Blacks wanted to fight in WWI, were there tv's for people then???


Many didn't. That's the essential failure of anecdotal evidence. You can always find a counter-example.





farglebargle -> RE: Pat Buchanan vs Adolf Hitler (5/23/2007 7:49:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: girl4you2

fast reply:
sheesh people, quit taking my green font!



The fucking auto-quote system doesn't provide the closing tag for the font and color specs.

It's a bug.

I wish it just stripped the color codes out, but that's just my preference... ( And that WOULD BE a good preference to be able to set, wouldn't it? )





lockedaway -> RE: Pat Buchanan vs Adolf Hitler (5/23/2007 7:50:24 PM)

You weren't talking about experiences, you were talking about socio-economic status.  The Irish (gosh, did I spell it right, hon?) experienced predjudice and so did the Italians and the Jews and the Puerto Ricans and the Koreans....all down the line.  OK, so what you are saying is that no white family was as poor as a black family in the 1950's?  LOLOLOLOLOLOL do I have that right?  As someone who grew up in Arkansas, I can assure you that not only are you WRONG about the 50's but you are still WRONG is you made that statement concerning the first decade of 2000. 

Oh...the only ones that didn't experience any predjudice were the Vietnamese.




lockedaway -> RE: Pat Buchanan vs Adolf Hitler (5/23/2007 7:53:07 PM)

That is true, the Civil War was about State's rights and the right to cecede, not slavery.  Lincoln made it about slavery because without a moral issue, many northerners weren't all that concerned about the South becoming its own country.

No...many didn't have tv's in WWI but that is largely because it hadn't been invented yet.




girl4you2 -> RE: Pat Buchanan vs Adolf Hitler (5/23/2007 8:28:06 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway

You weren't talking about experiences, you were talking about socio-economic status.  The Irish (gosh, did I spell it right, hon?) experienced predjudice and so did the Italians and the Jews and the Puerto Ricans and the Koreans....all down the line.  OK, so what you are saying is that no white family was as poor as a black family in the 1950's?  LOLOLOLOLOLOL do I have that right?  As someone who grew up in Arkansas, I can assure you that not only are you WRONG about the 50's but you are still WRONG is you made that statement concerning the first decade of 2000. 

Oh...the only ones that didn't experience any predjudice were the Vietnamese.



perhaps you might wish to peruse back a bit (or look here for a synopsis) as to what i did or didn't refer to. i at no time said that situations regarding white and black families were the same now, nor did i say that whites were uniformly affluent whereas blacks were not. to do so would be ludicrous. and it wasn't i who originally brought up the 1950's or 1960's, nor the 1900's. one needn't have grown up in the deep south to see the hypocrisy of buchanon's words. it's alive and well in any city in any state in this country, and in others as well.

i doubt even buchanon would see the likes/equivalents of a david duke and a malcom x walking hand in hand talking about how sweet the pie was.


quote:

ORIGINAL: girl4you2

Ed.
quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydog1

Buchanon said
"In 1960, 18 million black Americans, 10 percent of the nation, were not fully integrated into society, but they had been assimilated into our culture. They worshiped the same God, spoke the same language, had endured the same Depression and war, watched the same TV shows on the same four channels, laughed at the same comedians, went to the same movies, ate the same foods, read the same newspapers and went to schools where, even when segregated, we learned the same history and literature and shared the same holidays: Christmas, New Year's, Washington's Birthday, Easter, Memorial Day, July 4, Labor Day, Columbus Day. Segregation existed, but black folks were as American as apple pie, having lived in this land longer than almost every other group save the Native Americans.


am i the only one who has some real problems with both what this guy said and his logic, facts, and basic understanding of this issue of blacks in the 50s society? watched the same tv shows? how many had tv in each group? same comedians? same musicians? how many ate the same foods? how many foght the war side by side? i don't think so. american as white apple pie? please. and what about the chinese who were brought over to work on the west coast? the mexicans who were from the southwest, but not native americans? this whole thing just doesn't fly for me. the french and spanish might have something to say about it as well; new orleans, st. augustine, etc. were around a fairly long time ago.




LightHeartedMaam -> RE: Pat Buchanan vs Adolf Hitler (5/23/2007 8:36:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy

quote:

ORIGINAL: girl4you2
 i suppose we could go wayyyyy back, and all just leave quietly if we're not native american, inuit, mexican, or other natives.


Except for the fact that all of them immigrated illegally from north-eastern Mongolia over the ice bridge.
 
Dont you people understand?
 

Everybody in the Americas immigrated illegally!
 
The only solution is for us to all pack up our tents and go home.
 
Sinergy


Shall we take our air conditioners, TVs cars, cuisine, buildings, military and computers and infrastructure with us too?  (I'm gonna need a bigger suitcase)
 
At least the Europeans learned the  language to do business with the natives. If there were rules for admittance, we would have acquiesced to them.  Europeans like rules. 
 
(BTW, isn't Spain part of Europe?  And after all these centuries in Mexico, why isn't it doing better?)




Sinergy -> RE: Pat Buchanan vs Adolf Hitler (5/23/2007 8:54:16 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway

Lincoln made it about slavery because without a moral issue, many northerners weren't all that concerned about the South becoming its own country.



This is not entirely correct.

Lincoln made it about slavery after the European powers refused to support his war unless he made slavery illegal.

Ever wonder why the Emancipation Proclaimation only applied to slaves in the states in rebellion?

Sinergy




dcnovice -> RE: Pat Buchanan vs Adolf Hitler (5/23/2007 9:11:48 PM)

quote:

the Europeans learned the  language to do business with the natives.


The Europeans learned Algonquian and Iroquois and Powhatan and . . . ?




LightHeartedMaam -> RE: Pat Buchanan vs Adolf Hitler (5/24/2007 8:10:01 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

the Europeans learned the  language to do business with the natives.


The Europeans learned Algonquian and Iroquois and Powhatan and . . . ?


If they wanted to do business with them, that is my understanding




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
3.100586E-02