Padriag -> RE: Micromanagement (5/20/2005 1:03:05 AM)
|
Its been my experience, and is my opinion, that a slave sometimes acts as a personal assistant and in that role may be held responsible for assisting the master / dominant in managing everything from their appointments and schedule, to their shopping, to wardrobe, to accounting. For some this brings up the question of who is in charge (as Emerald pointed out). I find that viewing it as being a personal assistant helps answer that. A personal assistant may do all those things, but they still work for that person, and if they fail to be a good assistant and do their job properly they will be fired. In the case of a slave being giving these tasks, it becomes the slaves job to assist the dominant in whatever ways outlined by the dominant to the dominants satisfaction. And, interestingly, if the slave fails to say, remind the dominant of an appointment, etc. can become grounds for punishment. The question of control ultimately comes down this, whatever the slave is doing, it was required by the dominant and must be done to the dominant's satisfaction... and both those points indicate it is still the dominant who has final authority.
|
|
|
|