|
Sicarius -> RE: The Best "Outing" of Global Warming I have ever read! (5/28/2007 9:00:04 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen
After a good nights sleep I see Sicarius continues his BS campaign.
Thank you for that response, DomKen. For a little while I was actually thinking you were the relatively polite and respectful one out of the bunch. I suppose I was mistaken.
quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen
You continue to throw around logical fallacies like no one has ever heard of a non sequitur, anecdotal evidence, straw man or any of the other fallacies you're throwing around in place of valid arguments.
Quote them.
quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen
1) Do you deny human involvement in the change in atmospheric CO2 that has occured in the last 200 years? If so what data exists in support of your denial?
2) Do you deny that the present atmospheric composition is able to retain more heat than the atmospheric composition from 200 years ago? If you do not do you agree that the change in CO2 concentration is the primary cause?
It's funny, I believe I've already answered these questions.
1.) No, I do not deny it, nor do I support it. I remain skeptical and have not yet made up my mind in favor of one side or the other. I understand that being skeptical is something you view as heretical against the Church of Global Warming, but I retain that position. You're looking for something that isn't there, DomKen. I don't support one side of this argument or the other side ... I am a bystander. Given the fact that your side seems to be comprised of nothing but zealots who want to scream and club people over the head for disagreeing with the "Almighty Power" of your ideology, I have to admit I'm leaning a bit more toward the "anti" side, though.
2.) I think that there is very compelling evidence to suggest that, yes. I have no real reason to deny that assertion at all based on what I do know about both sides of the debate.
quote:
ORIGINAL: farglebargle
I call BULLSHIT. NAME NAMES.
All these weasel words are what pisses people off. "A Very Large Number of People In The Scientific Community", don't exist except in moron's little-toy brains.
Hey, the propaganda is slick, and educational standards are pretty weak, so people who get suckered in shouldn't feel so bad.
Your chant at the beginning seems verly likely reminiscent of what must have been screamed on the sidelines at Salem's witch burnings.
Honestly, farglebargle ... what incentive do I have to continue replying to you with articulated responses when all you do is comb over every post and try to find a single sentence to scream at? We're not debating anything ... I'm posting and you're nitpicking single sentences that you take issue with. If you posted more than single-sentence paragraphs, I'm sure I could do the same in return. When you're ready to speak civilly about the merit of hypotheses, theories, etc. you let me know and I'll be right there to talk to you about it.
Right now your relevance in this discussion is somewhere below propaganda and lingering around mere distortion. For the sake of amusement, however, what say you of the treatment that Bjorn Lomborg received?
-Sicarius
|
|
|
|
