RE: the art of posting contentious threads is dead (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity



Message

KatyLied -> RE: the art of posting contentious threads is dead (5/29/2007 6:08:23 PM)

quote:

Definition of  contentious? 


It sounds like someone is begging for the obligatory wiki or dictionary link!  



HydroMaster -> RE: the art of posting contentious threads is dead (5/29/2007 6:09:29 PM)

I'm trying to resist that too lol



beargonewild -> RE: the art of posting contentious threads is dead (5/29/2007 6:19:29 PM)

Oh go for it Hydro, we know you can't resist  lol



HydroMaster -> RE: the art of posting contentious threads is dead (5/29/2007 6:23:35 PM)

No bear, I have to prove that I can show restraint in something.



TheHeretic -> RE: the art of posting contentious threads is dead (5/29/2007 6:29:30 PM)

      I have to disagree, LadyE.  It is alive and well, but the recent invasion of continuous posters who think 100 is a perfect score on the IQ test (and nobody's perfect) have changed the game a bit.

     I suggest a visit to the latest incarnation of the party cruise. Blocking anyone who posts often there will clear your screen of drivel in most other threads as well. 



HydroMaster -> RE: the art of posting contentious threads is dead (5/29/2007 6:31:24 PM)

No more migraine this week H.  There's isn't much that can bother me now.



Invictus754 -> RE: the art of posting contentious threads is dead (5/29/2007 6:37:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic
...continuous posters who think 100 is a perfect score on the IQ test...


Remember, if 100 is the average IQ score, the bell curve suggests that half the people you meet on the street have an IQ less than 100.
 
Sobering, isn't it?



MsPoetress -> RE: the art of posting contentious threads is dead (5/29/2007 6:38:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

Look, this is the right room for an argument, right?

E

No - This is abuse. Argument is 2 doors down on the right.
 
(...silly twit!)



lmao at Monty Python



maybemaybenot -> RE: the art of posting contentious threads is dead (5/29/2007 6:40:43 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: KatyLied

quote:

Definition of  contentious? 


It sounds like someone is begging for the obligatory wiki or dictionary link!  



** rolls eyes **

Wiki? C'mon now, Everyone knows that site can be edited by anyone.
I do not accept links as proof of anything. I want a Fed Exed notorized photocopy of the actual documents supporting another's view. If you can't produce that, you may as well just shush up, cuz your facts are useless.

                                 mbmbn



HydroMaster -> RE: the art of posting contentious threads is dead (5/29/2007 6:44:43 PM)

Do you accept faxes?  Probably not....to easy to forge the notory's signature by taping a copy of it from another document over the faxed one.



dcnovice -> RE: the art of posting contentious threads is dead (5/29/2007 6:45:55 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: maybemaybenot

quote:

ORIGINAL: KatyLied

quote:

Definition of  contentious? 


It sounds like someone is begging for the obligatory wiki or dictionary link!  



** rolls eyes **

Wiki? C'mon now, Everyone knows that site can be edited by anyone.
I do not accept links as proof of anything. I want a Fed Exed notorized photocopy of the actual documents supporting another's view. If you can't produce that, you may as well just shush up, cuz your facts are useless.

                                 mbmbn


You settle for photocopies?



KatyLied -> RE: the art of posting contentious threads is dead (5/29/2007 6:46:42 PM)

quote:

Wiki? C'mon now, Everyone knows that site can be edited by anyone.


My work here is done.....
               except for ...........................
                           [sm=mrpuffy.gif]



HydroMaster -> RE: the art of posting contentious threads is dead (5/29/2007 6:56:25 PM)

Yea, dancing puffs![sm=mrpuffy.gif][sm=mrpuffy.gif][sm=mrpuffy.gif][sm=mrpuffy.gif][sm=mrpuffy.gif][sm=mrpuffy.gif][sm=mrpuffy.gif][sm=mrpuffy.gif][sm=mrpuffy.gif][sm=mrpuffy.gif][sm=mrpuffy.gif][sm=mrpuffy.gif][sm=mrpuffy.gif][sm=mrpuffy.gif][sm=mrpuffy.gif][sm=mrpuffy.gif][sm=mrpuffy.gif][sm=mrpuffy.gif][sm=mrpuffy.gif][sm=mrpuffy.gif][sm=mrpuffy.gif][sm=mrpuffy.gif][sm=mrpuffy.gif][sm=mrpuffy.gif][sm=mrpuffy.gif][sm=mrpuffy.gif][sm=mrpuffy.gif][sm=mrpuffy.gif][sm=mrpuffy.gif][sm=mrpuffy.gif][sm=mrpuffy.gif][sm=mrpuffy.gif].....it's a dancing puff rave



maybemaybenot -> RE: the art of posting contentious threads is dead (5/29/2007 7:02:22 PM)

** remembers being ridiculed and almost driven off the CM site for using the puffy cloud emoticon **

Seems what is good for the goose is not good for the gander around here. I shouldn't really be surprised tho, it's that gang mentality you all have when you get together.

                                mbmb



Mikal -> RE: the art of posting contentious threads is dead (5/29/2007 7:02:55 PM)

Contentious:

  1. Given to contention; quarrelsome.
  2. Involving or likely to cause contention; controversial.

Contention:
  1. The act or an instance of striving in controversy or debate. 
  2. A striving to win in competition; rivalry: The teams met in fierce contention for first place.
  3. An assertion put forward in argument.
Links: Answers.com and Farlex Dictionary

I figured I'd put the rest of you out of your misery... I'll ease your temptation... [:D][:D][:D]





maybemaybenot -> RE: the art of posting contentious threads is dead (5/29/2007 7:05:17 PM)

quote:

HydroMaster:  Do you accept faxes?  Probably not....to easy to forge the notory's signature by taping a copy of it from another document over the faxed one.


quote:

dcnovice:  You settle for photocopies?


Good points. I will be editing my profile to include my name and home address. All proof of arguement must be delivered in person to me.

                           mbmbn




HydroMaster -> RE: the art of posting contentious threads is dead (5/29/2007 7:08:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: maybemaybenot

** remembers being ridiculed and almost driven off the CM site for using the puffy cloud emoticon **

Seems what is good for the goose is not good for the gander around here. I shouldn't really be surprised tho, it's that gang mentality you all have when you get together.

                               mbmb

Um, ok....use them all you want.  Unleash a giant puff army into the CM world if you like, doesn't matter to me.  Throw in a legion of dancing bananas while your at it.  Does anyone actually have a beef against the fluffies or was that just an extreme exaggeration?



TheHeretic -> RE: the art of posting contentious threads is dead (5/29/2007 7:21:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: HydroMaster

Does anyone actually have a beef against the fluffies or was that just an extreme exaggeration?




       You mean, like, a joke that not everybody is in on????



maybemaybenot -> RE: the art of posting contentious threads is dead (5/29/2007 7:28:24 PM)

LOL. I'm not so sure I would call it private, it was in another thread however.

I can't throw in the dancing bananas. Gauge would slap me silly. He hates them.

                           mbmbn



TheHeretic -> RE: the art of posting contentious threads is dead (5/29/2007 7:32:51 PM)

     Yeah.  They are annoying, but when you need a chorus line to really express that emotion, well





[sm=banana.gif][sm=banana.gif][sm=banana.gif]





       See?  Three clicks are worth a thousand WHOOPEE!'s



Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
4.711914E-02