RE: Becoming a Master/ Personal Ideas... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


velvetears -> RE: Becoming a Master/ Personal Ideas... (5/31/2007 4:39:05 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

quote:

ORIGINAL: velvetears

When i looked over the Master definition list #12 seems to stick out above the rest for what i sense resonates with you when you think of the term Master, could be wrong, it's just my impression.


quote:

ORIGINAL: "Definition 12"
a victor or conqueror


No, I don't .. see why you'd think this.  Would you tell me?

If I had to chose any one, it would be number two.

quote:

ORIGINAL: "Definition 2"
an owner of a slave, animal, etc.



Then by definition 2 you can't be a Master if you do not own a slave. How can "being a Master" then be inherent in someone if one cannot be one without the precondition of having a slave?

my perception of you resembling the "victor, conqueror" model seemed to me to describe you more as i have read your Masterhood thread, and this thread here, and in it you don't seem to be flexible, negoiatable, wanting to meet the subs needs as her position is to meet yours, i don't mean basic needs i mean the more human needs.  You appear to seperate the two (Master/slave) as dichotomies rather then two halves of a whole who need to cooperate together, realistically, to make everyone happy and work out long term.  You seem to think that  because you think of yourself as master and feel like one, others should follow suit and treat you as one with you doing no more then proclaiming it as such.  i can say i am a Queen but i would be waiting a long time for anyone to roll out a red carpet for me to walk on.   You also talked about being responsible for all of your slaves actions/choices/activities/etc - there doesn't seem to be any sort of free will or choice involved in your model of Master-slave - that to me sounds more like someone who wants to conquer - total control.  Not judging your model - just defining it as i interpret it.





velvetears -> RE: Becoming a Master/ Personal Ideas... (5/31/2007 4:44:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SirKitty

quote:

ORIGINAL: velvetears

my oldest daughter was born a gifted dancer - i saw this in her by the time she was three years old.  She didn't start taking dance lessons till she was around 14 and once the teacher saw her natural talent they assumed she had studied for years somewhere, they were astonsihed she was self taught.  They saw in her an ability they could nurture and help grow, they even offered to allow her to take more classses then i was going to sign her up for, for free, this his how much they thought of her talent.  They said she could probably go to Juliard one day if she so desired.    For reasons i won't get into here - she doesn't go to dance school anymore, life took a different course for her. 


well that sux.



Frustrating as hell for me but while i will always support her decisions and will not dictate her life for her - even if i think she's making mistakes. We discuss things but she must choose her own path.  At this point at 19 it's really "too late" so to speak for it to be any sort of real opportunity.  Such is life.




CuriousLord -> RE: Becoming a Master/ Personal Ideas... (5/31/2007 4:47:43 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MadRabbit

quote:

ORIGINAL: SireKane

"I propose everyone act naturally.  If, naturally, they guide and such, and give some orders, congrats!, they're a Dom(me).  If they naturally demand another follow them, as to be their property, and take control and responsibility, woot!, you're a {Master/Mistress}!  If they.. (sub, slave, etc., etc.) "



Well....I agree thats one defintion. Maybe everyone has lowered the bar on this to the point where this is the only politically correct definition.

Note:  The quoted quote is actually mine- you typed the wrong name here. :P

It's a bad thing, to be one's self?

quote:

ORIGINAL: MadRabbit

Personally, I havent. I am one of those odd ball people who think this goes past the toys and the relationship into something more.


Do you really feel this is odd for members such as on this board?

quote:

ORIGINAL: MadRabbit

I have some degree of personal character standards I hold myself to and unfortanely, Jimbo the beer bellied one toothed crack smoking slob with the sense of integrity that just barely goes past the bar for the average child molestor who just so happens to convince some naive chick off the Internet to come and stay in his house doesnt qualify.


But do you qualify these to yourself or to your "Master" position?  This is to ask, is your personal characteristic standards resultant of your Mastership, or because of your own self-respect and identity?

It's interesting, to consider what it would be like such a wretch as "Jimbo" to be a "Master".  I'll admit, it's hard for me to understand such a person.  Perhaps I'm making assumptions I don't realize?

quote:

ORIGINAL: MadRabbit

This is just me though. Yes, I do judge, the same way I judge myself and let me assure you I have quite a lot of experience and self development before I feal comfortable with anyone calling me Master.

In fact, I hate the word. I really do. It makes me feal like I am wearing pants three sizes too big.


So, in your words, are you a Master or not?  I always thought you said you were, but this sounds like it contradicts it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: MadRabbit

I agree with Archer. I beleive it begins with something inside of you. Call it desire, spiritual calling, an itchy rash, whatever. Certain individuals have it. I've met some of these individuals and when you say the word "Master", they deserve it. I have no idea whether I will ever be one of these individuals and dont really care. I know where I get my fulfillment and know which path has made me into a person I can actually look in the mirror and be proud of.


What do these individuals seem like to you?  What sets them apart?

quote:

ORIGINAL: MadRabbit

But this idea that its all about "acting naturally", I dont agree with. Yes, being yourself is what is important, but yourself is constantly changing and growing.


But if yourself naturally changes and grows.. isn't acting naturally implying that you also change and grow?

quote:

ORIGINAL: MadRabbit

I had to learn to be comfortable with the idea of a women carrying all the grocery bags while I had none. I ha
d to learn some of the natural behaviors we develop with visitors to our home and instead let that visitor fix the coffee and tea. As naturally dominant as what we want to claim to be, we're all still socialized to the same extent with the same behaviors....the whole "gentlemen" thing....unless of course we're completely socially dysfunctional and havent learned how to interact with average people successfully. Some of us unfortanely have to unlearn these habits and behaviors that come with being used to being a gentlemen and dealing with vanilla girlfriends and instead train ourselves how to act like a sub or slave.

But...wait...those people are just playing "roles".


Yeah.. the "role" comment was my first thought- letting labels such as "gentleman" and "dominant" influence if you carry the bags or not..?  Doesn't that seem like you're making the decision off the play?

Like, for me, I carry bags, no matter what.  I love to carry heavy things while I'd normally not be doing anything else anyhow- it's good excerise.  (Why be lazy out of the grocery store only to spend your lazy time making up for it at a gym later?  I never got that.  Like people who park as absolutely close to a store as possible, wasting five minutes driving around a parking lot, only to go on a walk when they get back home.)

A slave wouldn't serve me in taking the bags.  I want them.  It's not a role where she has to do the mundane things- it's just my decision.  To me, that's what dominance is all about.  Do you feel differently?

quote:

ORIGINAL: MadRabbit

Wow...I want to know what genes carry the ones that grant someone all the life experience necessary to make good decisions that earn a person's trust. Apparently I missed out on those! Or maybe...its because I am 23 and have many aspects of life to still experience.

Self explanitory, right? 


Pretty much.  Just think things out.  If she's your slave, she does what you say, right?

quote:

ORIGINAL: MadRabbit

Which genes give you all the knowledge necessary to handle every situation and problem that arises in a M/S situation? Oh wait...who needs that? Its super easy! She just does everything I say and we'll have no problems! And if she doesnt, then I kick her to the curve for being a bad slave and disobeying me! Its super easy, guys!


Sure, why not?  (Seriously- why not?)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MadRabbit

Which genes...

teach a person how to effectively use corpeal punishment?


You're assuming the need for punishment.  For many slaves I've known, telling them that you're disappointed in them worse than any surface pain you can do.  And more to the point.

quote:

teach a person how to use different behavior modification techinques to alter behavior?


Always seemed pretty straight forward to me.  If there's something that isn't, could you give me an example so that I might see my mistake?

quote:

teach a person how to develop the self control not to have a meltdown and start calling everyone idiots?


Lots and lots of patience.  Trust me, it's trying at times.
I'm not sure if "putting up with idiots" is necessary to be a Master, though.

quote:

teach a person how to do laundry, cook, clean, etc so they can turn around and teach a new slave these thing


Well, I know you're going to call me arrogant for this, but, I'm a tutor.. sort of found teaching to be pretty easy, especially to an eager mind such as that of a willing slave.  Hell, I've found it pretty easy to teach Differential Equations.  Following a cookbook isn't so bad.


quote:

teacg a person how to effectively communicate without causing negative reactions in the majortiy of people?


That's basically just not saying much.

Still, I get that, somewhere down the line, I probably hurt your feelings unintentially.  And I get that this probably sounds arrogant to you, as will this: I don't care.  I'm not up for the drama stuff.  I'm sorry if I hurt your feelings by accident; I really am.. but I haven't said anything mean to you at those times.  I think you need to toughen up a bit.

quote:

I really want to know, because I still have yet to hone or completely understand the majority of these skills. I guess I have missed out on some genes.


Is it that hard to teach?  I thought you'd have picked it up from your own parents, mentors, and teachers while growing up.  It's one of those basic skills kids learn.  True, refining it's good, but learning it?  You're sort of behind if you can't teach a slave to do the laundary.  =/




Anyhow, I love to pick things apart and debate smaller points.  I know you sort of basically told me you don't want to, because it just seems like an argument to you.  So that's fine.  Whatever works.  If you change your mind, here it is.  (If you do reply- I'd ask you answer the questions thoughtfully.  I don't recall asking any saracstic ones this post.  This isn't to say that all can be answered well- but none of them are just a mean thing, if this makes any sense.)




CuriousLord -> RE: Becoming a Master/ Personal Ideas... (5/31/2007 4:49:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: velvetears

Frustrating as hell for me but while i will always support her decisions and will not dictate her life for her - even if i think she's making mistakes. We discuss things but she must choose her own path.  At this point at 19 it's really "too late" so to speak for it to be any sort of real opportunity.  Such is life.


Yeah.  I think kids are happier when it's their own life, and not one of their parents' chosing- so, at least she can be happy, and that's what really matters, right?  You'll always have the memories of her dancing as a kid.

I'll answer your post to me shortly- just a bit of a AFK.




velvetears -> RE: Becoming a Master/ Personal Ideas... (5/31/2007 5:01:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MadRabbit

quote:

ORIGINAL: SireKane

"I propose everyone act naturally.  If, naturally, they guide and such, and give some orders, congrats!, they're a Dom(me).  If they naturally demand another follow them, as to be their property, and take control and responsibility, woot!, you're a {Master/Mistress}!  If they.. (sub, slave, etc., etc.) "



Well....I agree thats one defintion. Maybe everyone has lowered the bar on this to the point where this is the only politically correct definition.

Personally, I havent. I am one of those odd ball people who think this goes past the toys and the relationship into something more.

I have some degree of personal character standards I hold myself to and unfortanely, Jimbo the beer bellied one toothed crack smoking slob with the sense of integrity that just barely goes past the bar for the average child molestor who just so happens to convince some naive chick off the Internet to come and stay in his house doesnt qualify.



This is exactly what i was trying to get at - just "acting naturally" doesn't cut it , or just thinking your a Master making you one doesn't either... the above description MR gave is a good example - by CL's pov this guy can proclaim he's a Master irregardless of his character, value system, ethics, etc.... i would personally call Jimbo a fool or crazy, he can scream it from the rooftops but i doubt anyone will listen to him.

quote:

 MrrPete

Why can't a Mster and a Dom be the same person?

One really can't be a Master without being Dominant.
BUT one can be Dominanat with out being a Master

I'd rather others say I'm a Master than for me to proclaim
that I'm one and make a fool of myself.

Folks will figure you out very quickly if you're what you claim to be.

What's that old saying?

It is better to be thought a fool than to
oepn ones mouth and remove all doubt

 

i like your way of looking at it, especially the bolded part, it shows the person has  more confidence in themself and that would draw me to them. 




uobeyme -> RE: Becoming a Master/ Personal Ideas... (6/1/2007 12:34:37 AM)

Master Filk where is your book available to read?NIKO




CuriousLord -> RE: Becoming a Master/ Personal Ideas... (6/1/2007 12:39:34 AM)

Alright, excuse the long delay.  It's been a long evening.

quote:

ORIGINAL: "Definition 2"
an owner of a slave, animal, etc.

quote:

ORIGINAL: velvetears
Then by definition 2 you can't be a Master if you do not own a slave. How can "being a Master" then be inherent in someone if one cannot be one without the precondition of having a slave?


I tried to clear up the the confusion between the alternate forms of "[stance]" in post 43 of  Are you Dominant?".

To reiterate, a "Master" can be one who owns a slave, or one who would perfer to be one to own a slave.  The second usage comes from common usage.  Under such a usage, one who would be a Master in a relationship retains such a title despite lack of a slave.  Under the proper usage, in the "definition 2" you provided- and bolded, by the way- it calls for one being the owner of such, as is the proper definition.

quote:

ORIGINAL: velvetears

my perception of you resembling the "victor, conqueror" model seemed to me to describe you more as i have read your Masterhood thread, and this thread here, and in it you don't seem to be flexible, negoiatable, wanting to meet the subs needs as her position is to meet yours, i don't mean basic needs i mean the more human needs.  You appear to seperate the two (Master/slave) as dichotomies rather then two halves of a whole who need to cooperate together, realistically, to make everyone happy and work out long term.


A victor, conqueror, means this to you?  Alright, it's a strange way of seeing it, but I'll acknowledge your view.

To me, a victor or conqueror takes something by force, often in warfare.  I can't recall beating a slave over the head with a club and dragging her away from the site of a raid any time recently, but it is a somewhat humorous image when one can seperate oneself from the reality of it.

It does strike me as strange though you think I wouldn't acknowledge human needs, particularly with my history of explaining sub desired as based on such.  Perhaps you can tell me about why you said this?

quote:

ORIGINAL: velvetears

You seem to think that  because you think of yourself as master and feel like one, others should follow suit and treat you as one with you doing no more then proclaiming it as such.


What makes you think this?

quote:

ORIGINAL: velvetears

You also talked about being responsible for all of your slaves actions/choices/activities/etc - there doesn't seem to be any sort of free will or choice involved in your model of Master-slave - that to me sounds more like someone who wants to conquer - total control.  Not judging your model - just defining it as i interpret it.


Mostly.  I control her much more than others control their subs.  I often compare it to the Gorean model, as it's similar, as far as I can see, though I haven't done enough study on Gorean rites and beliefs to claim to speak for such a community.  And, yes, my slave asks permission to leave the room.

As I'm quick to empathise, I have a M/s model, not a D/s.  There is a very strong Dominance/submission dynamic going on in my relationship.  I'm happy with it.

Though, still.. "conquer"?  To conquer is to coerce, often in the physical sense.

quote:

ORIGINAL: "conquer", Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary

1 : to gain or acquire by force of arms : SUBJUGATE <conquer territory>
2 : to overcome by force of arms : VANQUISH <conquered the enemy>
3 : to gain mastery over or win by overcoming obstacles or opposition <conquered the mountain>
4 : to overcome by mental or moral power : SURMOUNT <conquered her fear>


I'm afraid this is not the case.




MasterBRD -> RE: Becoming a Master/ Personal Ideas... (6/5/2007 2:01:53 PM)

All I can say to this is Amen Sister, Amen!!!




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125