farglebargle -> RE: "Untrained, unarmed & underpaid." (6/1/2007 6:58:24 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: domiguy quote:
ORIGINAL: popeye1250 quote:
ORIGINAL: domiguy Does the level of security differ as to what they are protecting? I don't know....But for some reason I believe guards at banks are armed.....We don't need armed guards at lumber yards. Domiguy, I don't think we need any security guards at lumber yards, at least not during the day. But, the ones protecting say, 50 story office buildings with thousands of people working in them should be of a higher caliber. And if they're protecting "people" like that they should be well armed, well trained and well paid. I think the day of overwight "Jimmy" the security guard who makes $10 an hour and lives with his parents should be comming to an end. Or, "Gus" the old fart who's retired and "works security" for "drinking money." What they have in most buildings now are nothing more than hall monitors. How would they protect you in a fire? Security Guards should be trained in preliminary Firefighting in high rise buildings as well. Tired I can see that I was stating the obvious and I agree with you entirely on this point. But what will fat Jimmy do? You know how I worry about fat Jimmy. More importantly, WHO is going to pay for all this training? People hire cheap, unqualified labor, because it's CHEAP. In applications WHERE IT COUNTS, people are properly trained. For people who's main contribution is as an extra in "Security Theater", you get what you pay for. If you hired Illegals, you could get a higher class of employee for the same money, however. Just sayin'...
|
|
|
|