LadyAngelika
Posts: 8070
Joined: 7/4/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: EmeraldSlave2 quote:
ORIGINAL: kisshou Do you see a pygmalionesque approach as different than a Daddy or Mommy dom? Yes I do see them as different, while there may be some similarities. I think the intentions and the reasonings for what they do are very different. I agree. It's not about they dynamics so much as why you are doing what you are doing. Pygmalionism is about feeling Godlike in one's power, like the saviour of little lost souls. Though I don't do mommy/daddy play, I can tell you that my own parents never acted like they were my saviours. My mom always said that the day I left her womb, I didn't belong to her anymore, I belonged to the world. All she could do a that point was give me what she considered to be the best tools and instil me with what she considered to be the right values and be there for me if I needed her. That is the antithesis to pygmalionism! But notice how it is not void of caring and nurturing quote:
quote:
A subtle but reoccuring thread in all the forums and posts I see , is what I call the embracing of 'realism' vs the death of romanticism. I guess that is a topic for a different post... some food for thought kiss I don't think romanticism should die, but I don't think it should cloud the realities either. Because it most often does, and that's when people become disappointed and disillusioned. Romance is wonderful. It doesn’t have to be all about chivalry and white knights. In fact, the etymology of the word romance is all over the board. Romance is a form of writing, and by the 17th century became the language used when writing love stories. In today’s terms, it simply means “an ideal love affair”. Now what is ideal is extremely subjective. My ideal love affair is very different then most. My idea of romance consists of an intimate and open interaction with a man who is incredibly strong mentally, physically and in character, a man who is self-aware and self-actualised, who can express his needs and desires in a respectful manner, who will relish in me challenging him intellectually, spiritually and sexuality and who in return will provide some challenges himself. He will see me as his muse, his goddess, his mistress, his love but will keep both feet on the ground about it. He will see our relationship as a journey where I’m the driver, and he the passenger but won’t expect me to be the only one keeping my eyes on the road. He can't always be looking up at me like a lost little puppy looking for direction. As one of my favourite authors wrote: Aimer, ce n'est pas se regarder l'un l'autre, c'est regarder ensemble dans la même direction. (Translated to English: Love does not consist in gazing at each other but in looking outward together in the same direction.) - Terre des hommes, Antoine de Saint-Exupéry - LA
_____________________________
Une main de fer dans un gant de velours ~ An iron hand in a velvet glove
|