RE: silly royalty titles (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


LordODiscipline -> RE: silly royalty titles (5/25/2005 3:07:34 AM)

I have no issue with people who prefer such titles - I do have an issue with anyone that insists that I (personally) have to use when referring to them... I am not part of whatever scene they are manipulating; and, deeply resent being dragged into it through their egalitarian posing and/or through outright rudeness. I always respond negatviely if they choose to proceed to insist that I behave or use words in a specific way when addressing them.

If I were in the presence of rolyalty, I would demure to the issue because of social convention and correct decorum. Since (in all instances I have been exposed to) the person in question is not royalty, but has simply stayed at a 'Holiday Inn Royal Express' with their entourage, I generally choose not to assent to inclusion in their delusion.

~J




LadyAngelika -> RE: silly royalty titles (5/25/2005 5:06:34 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SirKenin
Funny that someone should start such a pointless thread. If the title has meaning other than "I am better than Y/you" then so what? Whatever works for them.


Hey Kenin, maybe you can start a thread called "silly dead movie star handles - get your own identity for pete's sake!". ;)

- LA




SenorX -> RE: silly royalty titles (5/25/2005 8:10:31 AM)

Nice thread here. Most folks in internet Ds or BDSM sites use names that are not their real life (r/l) names... duh.

My real name is not SeƱor X, but I have been using this name on the internet since 1996 and, since I have liked it and there are alot of folks that are already familiar with My name, plus the fact that I am a real person on/off the net so I don't need to change names as often as I change My underwear and socks, I have kept it the same over the years.

I am sure that Lady Angelika is not an herb that tastes like celery. Just like I would imagine the james dean herein is not the maker of jimmy dean sausage, ginger21 is not the movie star on Gilligan's Island,, etc. So internet names are just that... internet names.

I realize, though that some people take fantasy and sometimes the lines that distinguish virtual from real become thinner and thinner until it appears no line exists. I have noticed that before back with Excite VP, and even with YM... the word fights that happen "oh you come on over here and I'll whip yo ass" etc., there are many who take internet chatting way too seriously. Even in here in the message boards.

Ya'll, for the most part, have no idea whether I am some bum, unemployed loser who doesn't have a life, a millionaire who gets his kicks on the internet, someone supposed to be working and cheating his employer or the taxpayers by spending more time chatting and on message boards than actual working (which that's as bad as a thief), a self-employed professional that writes in between clients as a means of relieving stress and minimizes the screen while dealing with a client or doing research on the net, or even some 15 year old kid. Yes, I have My pic and a pic of Me and My lovely bride here posted, but even that is something that ya'll don't truly know if real or not, since I could have stolen that pic from an advertisement or anything for that matter.

So, in essence, silly titles here are no more sillier than the silly names herein, which is no more sillier than a bunch of us farts in here discussing the silliness of names and titles. LOL.

So what's wrong with being silly some?

X

X




LadyAngelika -> RE: silly royalty titles (5/25/2005 3:43:09 PM)

quote:

I am sure that Lady Angelika is not an herb that tastes like celery.


No. Apparently I taste just like honey ;)

- LA




masterdarkthorn -> RE: silly royalty titles (5/25/2005 3:51:44 PM)

I have always thought it to be a bit hokey, but I feel that the real so called lords and kings of this planet are no more deserving of such a title. I call myself master in collarme only and would never expect to be addressed that way by anyone. The only place that these sort of titles seem to prevail is on line...where else...lol




FangsNfeet -> RE: silly royalty titles (5/25/2005 4:38:28 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jamesdean

quote:

I find it absolutely silly and immature for a Dom/top to adopt a meaningless royalty title like LORD, DUKE, COUNT or BARON whatever.


Thank you for your opinion but what do you like for your sub/slave to call you? Also remember that some ppl just want to be a little different. If everyone went by Master, Daddy, Mistress, Dame, Maam or Sir, the munch might be a little boring. I remember one Dommina dressed up in a Bee costume calling herself "Queen B." She had a submissive dressed in simmalr atire named "Worker Bee." It was different and cute as it added flavor and creativity to the event. So when attending an event do you think less of a Dom using a title?

Most Dom's want to be called something by there subs and it would be nice to think outside your box.




Padriag -> RE: silly royalty titles (5/26/2005 4:58:37 AM)

I find such titles a bit silly and pretentious. Its been my experience that most people who use such titles fall into one of three general groups. Those who use them cause it sounded neat, but they never really gave it much more thought than that, these are by far the most "innocent" group. Those who use them because they are living out a fantasy of some kind, sometime such individuals entire persona is pure fantasy. Then there are those who use such titles because they really are trying to be pretentious and I find such the most annoying of all (chiefly because of their personaltiies, not the titles they assume).

As for myself, I suppose I'm fairly pedestrian about it. Padriag actually is my first name.




junecleaver -> RE: silly royalty titles (5/26/2005 9:51:35 AM)

quote:

As for myself, I suppose I'm fairly pedestrian about it. Padriag actually is my first name.


Wow. That's pretty cool. Why did your parents name you Padriag?

You know...I think those little titles are kind of silly too. They definitely don't catch my attention, like a more unique screenname might. But some people just aren't that great at making up screen names. I try not to make mine too corny, but if someone else wants to be that way....I guess that's just not a big deal to me.




Padriag -> RE: silly royalty titles (5/27/2005 4:35:02 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: junecleaver


Wow. That's pretty cool. Why did your parents name you Padriag?


My guess is because it went really well with the rest of my very Irish name... Padriag Sean O'Neal [;)]




Estring -> RE: silly royalty titles (5/27/2005 6:45:54 PM)

yes




k8 -> RE: silly royalty titles (5/27/2005 7:04:14 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: jamesdean

I understand the use of the social or courtesy titles Master and slave, both in the intimate context of a lifestyle realtionship and in a scene. However, I find it absolutely silly and immature for a Dom/top to adopt a meaningless royalty title like LORD, DUKE, COUNT or BARON whatever. If it is used as part of an email handle I might find it easier to understand, but when it is expected in a greeting or as salutation, I think a serious reality check long over due. Anyone else find this silly?


Yes. I find it extremely silly. It's almost as bad as the Y/you thing, which I absolutely hate.




GddssBella -> RE: silly royalty titles (5/27/2005 7:32:57 PM)

G'evening all:


What truly puzzles me? Is why does it get someone's panties in such a twist? Simply ignore them & move on.

quote:

On another note, my own screen name. "GoddessBellissima". Kinda full
of itself, on it's own. My intention though was descriptive rather
than a self imposed honorific. There are 5 arch-typical roles that
female dominants generally fall into. (I will not list/describe them
all, merely give you the frame of reference & you can read for
yourselves: "The Mistress Manual" by Mistress Lorelei available
through greenerypress.com - nice lil handbook during my earlier
times) My preference is the Goddess role. She who is to be
worshipped, adored, put on a pedestal, yada, yada, yada, ad
nauseum/infinitum. I in no way identify myself as a deity. That
would be foolhardy in the extreme & pompous as hell. I simply enjoy
being pampered. What woman wouldn't?? The latter part of my screen
name was taken from a nick name an old boyfriend tagged me with. He
used to call me "Mia Bellissima". Italian for "My Beautiful". Or
some other rough translation thereof. I lopped off the possessive, &
slapped the two together. Not because my vanity demands a lofty
label but because, heck, it sounds good that way, lol.

I'm getting a burning sensation around the ears.... I can almost
HEAR the clamoring over this ~softer~ side. What about my sadistic
nature known to so many? That's simple. I do flip between the
Goddess & the Amazon at will. It's just my nature. Don't try to
figure it out. I gave up ages ago, hehe.

Personally, I'm never comfortable with titles, honorifics, etc. Even
in scene. I designate the usage of the Goddess title during a scene
though because it appears to make the sub/bottom/slave more at ease.
It establishes a heirarachy in which they can relax, give over
control & find freedom in their letting go. I think a basic "Ma'am"
is a good all around term because it denotes deference without
actually having to go into all the other factors. Such as intimacy,
romance, etc.

I certainly don't feel either gender is superior to the other.
Respect should never be given, it better damn well be earned!
Courtesy on the other hand, is just good manners. All should
practice it, especially if they'd like to have it returned.


A cross posted quote of my own from my original thread "Titles, Labels, & Myths". Think that wraps it up nicely.


Stay safe, play nice, & share your toys w/ others....


[:D]


Bella




Lepidoptera -> RE: silly royalty titles (5/27/2005 10:34:01 PM)

Oh God, titles.

So, my first Master wanted me to call him Master.

The second Dom I started to play with made me guess what to call him. So I said, tentatively, "Master?" He then replied that I was wrong, because we weren't in a relationship, that I was to call him "Sir."

The third Dom made me guess too. So I said, tentatively, "Sir?" He then replied that he hated that because he was in the military. So of course, Master.

I HATE IT I HATE IT I HATE IT. Just tell me what to freaking call you, or else I'm going to guess something like "orange painted plastic eye" and you're going to think that I disrespect you. Well, I do. My hard limits are : cutting, urethral sounds, and GUESSING GAMES.




LadyAngelika -> RE: silly royalty titles (5/28/2005 6:16:20 AM)

quote:

I HATE IT I HATE IT I HATE IT. Just tell me what to freaking call you, or else I'm going to guess something like "orange painted plastic eye" and you're going to think that I disrespect you. Well, I do. My hard limits are : cutting, urethral sounds, and GUESSING GAMES.

You rock chica!

- LA




Faramir -> RE: silly royalty titles (5/28/2005 6:25:10 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: perverseangelic

Heh. I'm invovled in the SCA, every time I see a title like that I want to ask...."so, where did you reign?"


Now that's funy :)




kc692 -> RE: silly royalty titles (5/28/2005 6:25:39 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lepidoptera

Oh God, titles.

So, my first Master wanted me to call him Master.

The second Dom I started to play with made me guess what to call him. So I said, tentatively, "Master?" He then replied that I was wrong, because we weren't in a relationship, that I was to call him "Sir."

The third Dom made me guess too. So I said, tentatively, "Sir?" He then replied that he hated that because he was in the military. So of course, Master.

I HATE IT I HATE IT I HATE IT. Just tell me what to freaking call you, or else I'm going to guess something like "orange painted plastic eye" and you're going to think that I disrespect you. Well, I do. My hard limits are : cutting, urethral sounds, and GUESSING GAMES.



THUD!!!!!! RFLMAO- Let us know how the next one reacts when you ask it that way, [:D][:D][:D][:D]

Seriously, that is why my handle has nothing, I have what I prefer when I am in a relationship, and choose to share it up front with them, AFTER I see we are going to be involved with each other....


edited for: I hate dyslexia when I type, have to edit to straighten letter order...




ScooterTrash -> RE: silly royalty titles (5/28/2005 8:35:11 AM)

For the most part..I would have to agree that the fictitious titles are simply because they are legends in their own mind..lol. Probably doesn't do any real harm, but I personally don't think it should be expected that their "title" should be used as the way they are addressed in public, by all..but I would say exceptions within their own relationships are up to them (not as a guessing game though). The moderator of our local munch group "site" has LORD in front of his name, but it really is a screen name (nick) of sorts and calling him by his real name no way offends him..for all I know, addressing him as Lord might offend him (I think I'll ask next time I see him, never really thought about it). To proclaim yourself as a nobleman or noblewoman (nobleperson I guess to be politically correct) or any other specific descriptive "title" and expecting others to address you as such, does seem to be somewhat pretentious.

As strictly an on-line nick or username, some who use specific titles seem to be locking themselves into a characterization (assuming they intend to keep the same name for a very long time) which may or my not reflect their true identity, preceived stature or preferences in the future. Might be an issue if after time "Lord Barron Dingleberries" decides he is actually a submissive...lmao.




BeachMystress -> RE: silly royalty titles (5/29/2005 8:16:03 AM)

quote:

hard limits are : cutting, urethral sounds, and GUESSING GAMES.



ROFLMAO.. *wipes tear from eye* I once had a sub who had learning to crochet as a hard limit and your feeling about guessing games sounds like his about crochet. That one happened after he watched me make another sub demonstrate how his learning crochet was progressing in a restaurant. I've never seen a man so horrified as that other sub. He felt that was taking humiliation far beyond any acceptable bounds. The look on his face! LMAO! To this day, crochet is in his list of hard limits.




perverseangelic -> RE: silly royalty titles (5/29/2005 9:38:03 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Faramir


quote:

ORIGINAL: perverseangelic

Heh. I'm invovled in the SCA, every time I see a title like that I want to ask...."so, where did you reign?"


Now that's funy :)



Tis true, tis true. I'm still trying to figure out all the titles, so I see "DukeDOM" and I'm sitting there counting on my fingers how many times he's won crown.


Before I realize I'm being a total dork.




kc692 -> RE: silly royalty titles (5/29/2005 9:48:19 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BeachMystress

quote:

hard limits are : cutting, urethral sounds, and GUESSING GAMES.



ROFLMAO.. *wipes tear from eye* I once had a sub who had learning to crochet as a hard limit and your feeling about guessing games sounds like his about crochet. That one happened after he watched me make another sub demonstrate how his learning crochet was progressing in a restaurant. I've never seen a man so horrified as that other sub. He felt that was taking humiliation far beyond any acceptable bounds. The look on his face! LMAO! To this day, crochet is in his list of hard limits.


Now, I am really rolling....if I were to be asked what the most unusual hard limit is, somehow, I still don't think crochet would have even hit my mind!!!!! Very inventive on your part, and hilarious!!!!!!!




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875