OrionTheWolf
Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006 Status: offline
|
What about those that are obese, high cholesterol or high sugar? I think the point is, at what point does the slippery slope stop if they can be refused for one thing. The thing happens to be smoking, which many people do not like emotionally, but there are also slow healing and health concerns in obese, high cholesterol and high sugar people as well. Where would it stop? In the US the insurance companies are starting to target smokers, and it is a horrible addiction to have. The irony is that insurance here will not pay for things that will help someone stop smoking. Orion quote:
ORIGINAL: philosophy quote:
ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth ..........They are dictating policy with no other option after the fact of announcing "universal". .......nope they're not. In the UK, which is the country we are speaking of with this news story, there is no question of not being allowed to pay for any procedures. quote:
I think people should be "scared". Just because this decision isn't pointed at them why assume immunity for similar future decisions? The response; "If they don't like this they can purchase additional coverage at additional expense."; would seem in opposition of the concept being sold - universal health care for everyone. In this case, in this instance, it is health care for this problem only if you are a non-smoker. That is the pragmatic reality of this action. I extrapolate from that action based upon history. ...i have italicised that sentence because it is another inaccuracy. Health care is not being denied. A specific procedure is, because that procedure is materially affected by continuing to smoke. You state that people ought to be scared. That may be true of models of health care proposed in the US. However it is a distortion of what has happened in the UK. To be honest, you seem to be scaremongering, based on a misunderstanding of what is really being proposed.
_____________________________
When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."
|