Termyn8or
Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005 Status: offline
|
So here we have two opposite ends of the spectrum. I love irony, especially when it is so true. As you all know I proclaim to be a racist but not a bigot. So let me make this statement first : Diversity kills itself. Some interracial relatioships will occur, but if they are the norm, prevalent and common, what happens is the population is more and more mixed. Eventually, as Redd Foxx said, after the next war, everybody will be brown. If nobody preserves their heritage and race by mating with those of similar heritage, that is lost. Then we have a neo-heritage. I shall not comment on whether this is good or bad, but it is a fact of life. The fact is, eventually everybody will be the same. Then there is no diversity. While I do not laud these sectarian groups who isolate themselves from the bigger gene pool, I believe they have a point. The problem is that they carry it to the opposite extreme. Actually Jews have the same problem, but not as severe. Someone with higher math skills could figure it out, for example, take ten families and only the kids of these ten families will intermarry, with noone else. How many generations are likely to pass before the "cousin syndrome" occurs ? Indeed, how long until they are literally all cousins ? Now take and do that with 100 families for example. The answer is, it takes alot longer. For any who might be logistically impaired, "takes alot longer" means it is GOING to happen anyway. In fact if you un-grasp the mathematical formulae and embrace the math itself, it is clear that this will happen to the entire human race if we somehow manage not to destroy ourselves first. The numbers are too immense, and it would be a long time, but there is no doubt. So there is no answer. Optimally there would be a limited amount of interbreeding, and people would be careful who they have kids with, but that only extends the cycle. What cycle you might ask ? The life cycle of the human race. At least as we know it. I am not saying that it is hopeless, and a day comes when no Man walks the Earth, not at all. Actually if we each get our fair share of life, what do we care if there are eventually no more like us ? But that is not going to happen. As the human race reaches this point of critical mass so to speak, where other people are seen as pests, terrorists, infidels, heathens, whatever name they choose to give it this century, this is the backslide. I have no despair about this. We are a decadent society which IIRC is what the Russians used to say. The root of the word decadent is decay. Not a very nice way to put it, but true. There was a time when kids couldn't read, but they could survive out in the woods indefinitely. There was a time when people unable to eek out an existence somehow, died. Those were the times that gave birth to these cults and whatnot where one guy is directing all the mating, telling 16 and 19 year old kids to have kids, for example. Or the Mormons thinking it's OK to have a bunch of Wives. Actually this worked well a long time ago. They would live, work and fight together for all. It was one for all and all for one. This would work well in a harsh environment, uncharted territory etc. I think the greatest folly of Mankind has been choosing the wrong leaders. If the leader of the Polygamist Community had any fucking brains he would not want 16 year olds having kids, or even sex today. He is not a leader, he is a fucking pervert, and I don't mean it in a nice way, like us folk. If they live their lives in a true communist style, by that I mean like in a commune, so be it. With proper leadership they can all have very rewarding lives, carreers all that. Those with earning power can go out and bring in some money, others work the farm, others cook, and so forth. Others who might be able to go make money might stay home to teach the young. And not no fucking religious end of the world goobletygook. Math, science, engineering, languages. It CAN work, it HAS worked in the past, but like anything else it has poisoned itself in the worst way. They can't find a true leader. And if you peruse this, and other forums you might see there is a consensus, we can't find true leaders either. I'll close with this, which I think quite profound : The People hunger so badly for a true leader they elect anyone with some charisma, and somehow found the way to be presented to them. It has now gotten to the point that if a true leader were to emerge, the People wouldn't recognize it if he ,,,,,,,,,, wouldn't matter what he did I think. If that weren't true, answer me this : Why do the candidates have to look their best ? Why do they need speechwriters ?. T
|