"NYC pays $29,000 for arresting topless woman" (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


Vendaval -> "NYC pays $29,000 for arresting topless woman" (6/25/2007 7:39:06 AM)

"New York City pays $29,000 for arresting topless woman"
 
POSTED: 3:31 p.m. EDT, June 18, 2007
 
" NEW YORK (AP) -- A woman arrested for exposing her breasts has accepted a $29,000 settlement from the city, her lawyer said.

Jill Coccaro, 27, was arrested on a topless stroll two years ago, despite a 1992 state appeals court ruling that concluded women should have the same right as men to take off their shirts.

Coccaro, who now goes by the name Phoenix Feeley, remained in custody for 12 hours before she was told prosecutors were not going to pursue charges.

Her attorney, Jeffrey Rothman, told the Daily News that his client won the civil rights settlement from the city, which did not admit or deny wrongdoing.

"We hope the police learn a lesson and respect the rights of women to go topless," Rothman said.

Feeley told the New York Post that she was not treated well after her August 4, 2005, arrest in Manhattan's Lower East Side section. She claimed in an October lawsuit that a police officer yanked her out of a patrol car by her hair and police took her to a hospital for a psychiatric evaluation.

She told the newspaper she had gone bare-breasted after running the 2004 city marathon without police bothering her.

"I've always just felt that was something natural," Feeley said of going topless.
"I've kind of always done it out of practicality." "

http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/06/18/topless.settlement.ap/index.html




farglebargle -> RE: "NYC pays $29,000 for arresting topless woman" (6/25/2007 7:41:42 AM)

It's only been FIFTEEN YEARS since the right's been affirmed!





Vendaval -> RE: "NYC pays $29,000 for arresting topless woman" (6/25/2007 7:45:41 AM)

True, but I think the cops were too distracted by the bare breasts to remember the law in question.  [sm=shake.gif]




Lordandmaster -> RE: "NYC pays $29,000 for arresting topless woman" (6/25/2007 7:50:29 AM)

I think this right needs to be affirmed more often.




aviinterra -> RE: "NYC pays $29,000 for arresting topless woman" (6/25/2007 9:23:07 AM)

What wonderful news! More women should feel so at ease with their bodies. 




domiguy -> RE: "NYC pays $29,000 for arresting topless woman" (6/25/2007 9:53:04 AM)

In tribute to this victory, all of the women on CM ....Should take pics with their tops raised.....In a  unanimous show of support for "Phoenix Feeley."




cyberdude611 -> RE: "NYC pays $29,000 for arresting topless woman" (6/25/2007 10:10:08 AM)

Now if only we can convince the MPAA who gives an automatic "R" rating to a movie if a woman's breast is shown. Of course if a man's chest is shown, it doesn't effect the rating.




Vendaval -> RE: "NYC pays $29,000 for arresting topless woman" (6/25/2007 4:03:09 PM)

I totally agree.  Why is it that men can be topless on the beach but not women? That makes no sense at all to me.




slaveboyforyou -> RE: "NYC pays $29,000 for arresting topless woman" (6/25/2007 4:42:20 PM)

Some women and men should not go topless at anytime.  Since I am for equal protection under the law, I propose a tradeoff.  Women have to wear tops at the beach, but men are not allowed to wear speedos.  Just because you can do something, doesn't mean you should. 




darchChylde -> RE: "NYC pays $29,000 for arresting topless woman" (6/25/2007 4:48:38 PM)

unfortunately, women topless will not be considered obscene if guys didn't see a woman's exposed breasts as sexually provocative




Vendaval -> RE: "NYC pays $29,000 for arresting topless woman" (6/25/2007 4:51:00 PM)

Lol...that reminds me of a quote by Richard Simmons, the work out and fitness guru,
"Remember ladies, spandex is a priveledge and not a right!"  [:D]


quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveboyforyou
Just because you can do something, doesn't mean you should. 




Vendaval -> RE: "NYC pays $29,000 for arresting topless woman" (6/25/2007 4:54:07 PM)

I consider women's breasts as beautiful and sexual as well but in no way find them "provocative".  Body parts are just there for the viewing unless you are invited to a game of "paint by numbers" with finger-paint-bubble-bath-that-dissolves-into-a-rainbow-of-colors.


(had to edit a vowel)




trixxitrash -> RE: "NYC pays $29,000 for arresting topless woman" (6/25/2007 10:28:48 PM)

Awesome. How long till we can all go bottomless?




Lordandmaster -> RE: "NYC pays $29,000 for arresting topless woman" (6/25/2007 10:34:14 PM)

That's gonna take a while.




Vendaval -> RE: "NYC pays $29,000 for arresting topless woman" (6/25/2007 11:34:24 PM)

Start going to Burner events, the one put on by regional groups based on Burning Man, plenty of partial and full nudity.  When the guys go around with a shirt on and no pants it is called, "Shirt-cocking".


quote:

ORIGINAL: trixxitrash
Awesome. How long till we can all go bottomless?




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125