RE: Number of play partners (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


LadyAngelika -> RE: Number of play partners (6/28/2005 4:49:31 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: EmeraldSlave2

Some people just don't value active sluts, I accepted that a long time ago.

Some people even look down on me for being an active slut.


Exactly. And yet, some people value them :) Like me.

- LA




Jayxkes -> RE: Number of play partners (6/29/2005 4:42:40 AM)

This all depends on YOUR definition of play and play partners. You can be pretty sure there will be several differing definitions about.

I have, and have had, a number of play partners. They have ranged from regular to occasional, from fully sexual to non sexual relationships. They work.

However one argues the point, there will always be those who enjoy the involvement of others and those who do not.

Both views, and those in between, are equally as valid.

I enjoy others for the variation in response, the challenge, and plain simple greed on my part.

My wife, whilst purely submissive to me, enjoys exercising her dominant side. Ergo she needs someone else, as I'm not at all interested in the submissive side of things.

Our play partners have all added extra pleasure to our lives and we have all learned a little from each other.




ayasha -> RE: Number of play partners (9/13/2006 4:02:20 PM)

If this one wants to be flogged - will meet with someone that is good at flogging.  If one wants to be whipped - will meet with someone that is good at whipping.  Etc. Etc. Etc.  Most of these people are friends, or acquaintances one has known for a while.  There is no intercourse, no oral sex.  They love practicing their craft, one enjoys receiving it.  End of story. 




ScooterTrash -> RE: Number of play partners (9/13/2006 4:08:15 PM)

We're poly and have a closed poly household...so my partners are already here or extremely close friends, no muss, no fuss, no question of who is on the agenda.




LuckyAlbatross -> RE: Number of play partners (9/13/2006 5:04:03 PM)

Dang haven't seen this one in awhile.




CreativeDominant -> RE: Number of play partners (9/13/2006 5:46:49 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: subbiewench

Hello A/all,
I have a couple of questions related to the number of play partners with whom people choose to become involved at one time. I know this is a widely varied community and there will be those with greatly differing opinions but I would just like to get an idea of others' thoughts on the issue. I am a straight, female, unowned submissive so what follows appears in those terms but I believe the questions remain pretty much the same for anyone.

I have gotten the impression that many people are playing (something beyond just chatting online, talking on the phone or meeting casually to get to know someone better) with several others during the same time period. Not as in a setting such as a dungeon or special event where multiple people are in attendance but more in terms of being with person A even numbered days and person B on the odd ones. Is this in error?

In my younger days (vanilla), the few times I tried dating more than one person at a time it ended badly. Even if the relationship was very casual and each was aware that I was seeing someone else. Add those experiences to my natural disinclination to share (due either to shelfishness or insecurity, probably both) and mix in a huge helping of Catholic Guilt and I find I can only deal well with only one relationship (the level of intimacy and presence or absence of intercourse vary with each) at a time. That is why the concept of serial monogamy suits me well.

I have only "come out of the closet" and begun to seek others who enjoy the BDSM lifestyle in the last 6 months or so. I find I have many more opportunities to get to know people who are interested in pursuing something than I ever had in the past (a wonderful boost to my ego). I have usually dealt with others in sort of a "first come, first served" basis but now a feast is being laid before me. I don't want to let this new-found popularity go to my head and I do want to be honest with those I get to know. I also don't want to become involved with someone only to end things because someone "better" comes along. I have a feeling it would be easiest to just give in to my desires and play with anyone with whom there is a mutual attraction. However, I don't think I could do that successfully. Not to mention that old guilt thing. How do others deal with such issues?

I don't/wouldn't put the same type of requirements on those with whom I may become involved. However, to be perfectly honest, I would much prefer to become involved with those who feel the same way I do, that way much of what is written above becomes mute.

Just my $0.02 worth as I try to find myself in terms of this lifestyle. Please feel free to add yours thoughts and feelings.

Thank you,
subbiewench a.k.a kat


I respect your feelings and give kudos to you for the way you have expressed them.
If this is what works for you, I see nothing wrong with it.  If it stops working for you, then you can always revisit your decision and decide to continue on in your way or go another.  The important thing is to be honest with yourself about what it is you want.  As long as you can be honest with yourself and then express that honest feeling to others in the same way you have expressed it here, then you will be able to awake in the morning and look at yourself in the mirror without feeling that you've compromised yourself.

Will it cut down on the number of dominants available?  Sure.  But then, being an "ethical slut"cuts down on the number of dominants for said sluts.  It works from the other side of the whip too.  Being a dominant who wants only one to control cuts down on the number of submissives available just as being a dominant who wants more than one cuts down on the number of submissives available and just as being a dominant who is just starting over and wants to get to know people before committing to one cuts down on the number of submissives available.  Every one has their own idea of what works for them.  There are plenty of dominants on here who are interested in building a relationship with one woman/man at a time just as there are plenty who will see several women/men as they get to know each person and just as there are plenty who make it plain that they will always have other partners even while they get involved in a relationship with one that is completely different from all these others...their "main" relationship for lack of a better term. 

The main issue in all these cases is honesty...over and over again, it is a lack of honesty, not only in communication with others but with oneself, that creates the biggest problems of all.




mstrjx -> RE: Number of play partners (9/13/2006 6:06:34 PM)

For me, I fall into the 'serial monogamist' camp, in a relationship.  Also, it would make life very complicated if I were to 'play' just to play, and not be looking towards a relationship.  It tends to get far too intense.

I feel like I need to decorate with those giant yellow road hazard signs.  But my walls are already full.

Jeff




LotusSong -> RE: Number of play partners (9/13/2006 6:59:32 PM)

Just a thought here... Is it "Cereal" or just that you are "Fresh Meat"?




mstrjx -> RE: Number of play partners (9/13/2006 7:21:03 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LotusSong

Just a thought here... Is it "Cereal" or just that you are "Fresh Meat"?


Didn't notice until just a moment ago that this thread was started 15 months ago.

The OP might have changed minds half a dozen times, orientations twice, and is now a nun.  Or a welder.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
1.367188E-02