The "I'm Stronger Than You" Game (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master



Message


MadRabbit -> The "I'm Stronger Than You" Game (7/5/2007 6:31:29 PM)

I've met two or three potential partners who, in the initial first conversation, seemed to have made a point to state how strong and independent of a person they are and then proceeded to resist and argue with everything I had to say with no logical reason other than to turn the conversation into some childish battle of wills.

I've taken to calling this common expereince the "I'm going to show how strong I am to the big bad dominant" game.

Personally, its an instant turn off. I'm very polite and respectful to everyone, regardless of whatever self declared orientation. I have no interest in participating in this and consider it immature.

I have no issues with people who are fiesty, but rather have an issue with someone who is just downright beligerent and defiant as if they had something to prove to me (or that I somehow think less of them and need them to prove something to me)

Just curious if this is a shared experience for other dominants?

And if so how did you handle it?




Rover -> RE: The "I'm Stronger Than You" Game (7/5/2007 6:35:19 PM)

I go into "game show host" mode....
 
"Awww, that's too bad.  But thanks for playing.  We have some lovely parting gifts for you."
 
John
 
P.S. - They never actually get any parting gifts... sometimes I lay awake at night feeling guilty about that.  Well.... no... I don't.


Upon further reflection, I have to admit that before "game show host" mode kicks in, I'll observe that she seems nervous and do what I can to help her feel comfortable.  Sometimes the need to prove how strong they are is a reaction to being overly nervous.
 
John




Inhibitor -> RE: The "I'm Stronger Than You" Game (7/5/2007 7:39:50 PM)

Keep in mind that many of those who identify as subs/slaves/masochists/morlocks/whatever are inundated with communications telling them all sorts of ridiculous things, such as who and what they are, how they should act, the sky is purple, etcetera.

There are two sides to the coin, and the other isn't any prettier. Which doesn't mean you personally have done anything in bad taste, nor does it justify the negative experiences you've dealt with, but there it is.

I've seen the "sub = headstrong/bratty" type, and don't get me wrong, it *is* rampant. But I'd wager in many cases it's more a cultivated defense mechanism than anything else. And those, well...they're not all that impossible to break (which isn't to negate the value of those who've gotten over it already). ;)





LuckyAlbatross -> RE: The "I'm Stronger Than You" Game (7/5/2007 8:18:57 PM)

It's actually very amusingly and truthfully illustrated in Screw the Roses.  In many ways this type of sub is MOST insecure and vulnerable with who they are and therefore must constantly put themselves in a situation of "You can't make me" knowing full well they really want it, just can't be strong enough to admit it.

Now, forceplay is great.  But like any type of play or scene, it has to be openly agreed upon and enjoyed by all.  If it's just another form of psychic vampirism (ie spend all your time convincing me how much you want me and why I should submit) then leave me out of it.

I simply respond by nodding and smiling.  It means they won't try and come after me, but then that means I don't have to reject them openly.




Faramir -> RE: The "I'm Stronger Than You" Game (7/5/2007 8:23:58 PM)

I've seen it a ton of times, and it gets to be tiresome after a while.  On the other hand, I wouldn't call it childish.  Giving up power, submitting to someone who is still essentially a stranger--those first steps into giving up to someone you do not know well--is a big deal.  I don't think it is easy, and I think for many it is damn scary.  So I understand the posturing and the declamation--it's self-defense perhaps?  Self-assurance?

It only happens on the phone though--face to face, that shit goes out the window.

As to your specific question MR, I've asked them directly why they feel the need to tell me, to make claims about, how tough/strong/hard to tame/etc they are.  I've tried to be direct, find out why they think they are doing it, and articulated that since I am not an enemy, not an adversary, adversial language is out of place.

I've met qirls who were bratty, SAMy, whatever, but that had a different feel.  That's more playful, take your shots, and clearly meant to be a challenge within the relationship, as opposed to a challenge TO the relationship.  I handle this like anything I guess-being upfront about it and getting it cleared up face to face in dialogue, so we can get to a face to face meeting and then all the bullshit can stop.




BlackDjinn -> RE: The "I'm Stronger Than You" Game (7/5/2007 8:25:25 PM)

I find I usually will follow my gut feelings when talking with a potential new sub to see if they are actually being honest in this or trying to test my resolve. Usually after several conversations will show if they have been handing a line if bull or if they are stating a fact and were just plain nervous during the initial contact. Any who do prove to be beligerant, I will simply ignore the culpret.




Trampler -> RE: The "I'm Stronger Than You" Game (7/5/2007 8:33:39 PM)

It makes me think that the person saying that, is trying to say they won't be a doormat, and well, going about the wrong way.  It seems to happen with those that are quite new to the lifestyle.  (at least that I have noticed.)




LotusSong -> RE: The "I'm Stronger Than You" Game (7/5/2007 8:35:15 PM)

Don't respond at all. 
 
When they ask why you aren't saying anything, say "I'm in awe of how much you impress yourself".




MissHarlet -> RE: The "I'm Stronger Than You" Game (7/5/2007 8:39:15 PM)

oh I love that line ..... may I use it ?




SimplyMichael -> RE: The "I'm Stronger Than You" Game (7/5/2007 8:40:14 PM)

The women who play the game of "no man is strong/powerful/dominant/whatever enough to dom me" is playing a game of putting others down so they feel better about themselves.  

So I just smile and say "that's nice" and wander off...




angelic -> RE: The "I'm Stronger Than You" Game (7/5/2007 8:44:42 PM)

i have to say it depends on what your first e-mail says... i.e.  You ask me to describe myself... those will be the words i use... i am a strong independent person.  If you tell me i cannot be submissive/slave etc because of that,  i will on a more probable than not basis, argue that with you.  You do not give enough information for anyone (in my opinion) to say they are wrong or you are. 




LuckyAlbatross -> RE: The "I'm Stronger Than You" Game (7/5/2007 8:45:40 PM)

Oh not to mention a lot of females are taught they NEED to play hard to get in order to get someone good and are afraid of looking too "easy."




Tenebrious -> RE: The "I'm Stronger Than You" Game (7/5/2007 9:26:18 PM)

You know, I don't actually mind somebody being bratty and defiant.  Struggling can be an entertaining part of the experience for both people involved.  If it's just a nervous thing or reactionary response due to past abusive messages, it would be worked out well before we ever got around to doing anything anyway, so it wouldn't be an issue.

What really gets my goat is when somebody identifies themself specifically as "submissive" and then tries to "correct" the things about me that they don't like - such as: "I'm going to teach you how to eat better" or "You need to buy a new car" or "You should talk more"

I mean, I have 8-pack abs, I prefer the sturdy metal vehicles I have to a block of plastic with wheels and I don't talk just to hear my own voice.  Personally, I think those are positive qualities.  Even if they disagree, though, if they're really so submissive shouldn't they be less concerned with trying to control petty things like that?  I'd much rather have to deal with a far less "submissive" girl that didn't constantly whine about how I'm too quiet, I don't have a fancy enough car and I eat too much meat.




Cuckme4Life -> RE: The "I'm Stronger Than You" Game (7/5/2007 9:42:58 PM)

i have this problem with a vanilla (female) employee,,,, you say zig, she is guaranteed to say  zag,,,, anything to be correcting and sometimes condescending anyone and everyone around her... we have tried to discuss her insolent attitude towards other employees a few times,,, she isnt getting "it"... and we are right at the verge of releasing her from her job because her confrontations with other employees has become quite too frequent,,,,,




LadyHeart -> RE: The "I'm Stronger Than You" Game (7/6/2007 12:51:55 AM)

How I respond to it depends upon my assessment of the rest of the picture. If the person concerned seems to have a chip on the shoulder mentality, well I'm never going to win. No matter what I do, they will manoeuvre to put me in the wrong, as they won't take responsibility for their own actions. When it's someone who seems to be using it as a mask for inexperience and insecurity, then it can be quite fun to reel them in. But I won't tolerate outright rudeness no matter what the cause. That's unacceptable to me no matter what the "explanation."
:))
LH




DiurnalVampire -> RE: The "I'm Stronger Than You" Game (7/6/2007 12:56:33 AM)

I have told several I have no interest in breaking someone.  If you are not going to give your submission to me freely and without my having to take it from you, then you are going to lose my interest very very quickly.
With the number of submissives out there, and those more than hapy to give themselves to me without a battle of wills or my havng to "earn" it, I move along if smeone tries that.
I will warn them once, but beyond that I dont stand for it.

DV




robertolapiedra -> RE: The "I'm Stronger Than You" Game (7/6/2007 1:36:30 AM)

Hello MadRabbit. "First contact" with a sub is only first contact. I do not mean who does the first move (E-mail, phone, invitation etc), I'm talking about a submissive submitting and dominant dominating.

In a first contact situation, the submissive submits (defers) in order to invite domination. The other way around is possible also, but not recommended for all sorts of reasons.

This being said, if the submissive is coming at you with a "domineering" mind fucking approach, a dominant has his answer about the sub's "intentions": "No, I am not submitting to you".

You may think it means : "If you want me to submit, you have to dominate me first! Overpower me!". You may do this, and if it works? Well I think you were just lucky (you don't really know this person at this stage, right?). If it does not work? Well a lot of horror stories come to mind.

The only only thing you can reply is: "If you want me to dominate you, you will have to show me that you are a submissive. At this moment, you are acting like a dominant."

Once in a while, not often, you will have a positive response (change of attitude). Most of the time, it will not change anything, but at least you leave nothing to interpretation as you walk away.

This type of "resistance" stems from ambivalence (don't know what the fuck you "want", and what the fuck you "are") and is for dominants who have a special kink for "dom bashing irreverent disobedient narcissic self serving so called subs". I'm sure there are many of "those", for them to chose from. It just may be that these "true" subs are using aversive techniques to weed out the pussy doms from the "true all bull shit accepting  unconditional super strong Doms".

As for me, I like submissives who "like" to defer, obey and please. When someone quickly shows me that it is not the case? I feel thankful to them for saving my time. As I walk away, I may say something to this effect: "Thank you, but no thank you!... and good luck in finding you "true" super Dom.!". (Or? if you dont really give a fuck in that situation, just say you don't do "bitchy vanilla posers". But that would be mean....)

Who needs this? RL.





Quivver -> RE: The "I'm Stronger Than You" Game (7/6/2007 2:25:09 AM)

Initial contact ... isnt that the same as a first conversation? 

Oh my Dear Maddrabbit those first few conversations are were I gain knowledge of that Dominant, I am sure I am not alone in this.  With that said I admit to keeping my guard up in the most polite manner I can muster.  I am sure that many times it is seen as bratty.  To use Faramir's words " Giving up power, submitting to someone who is still essentially a stranger--those first steps into giving up to someone you do not know well--is a big deal."  I do not give up my power to a stranger, it is a self protection mode that to me is the only safe way to go about getting to know another and to choose if it is someone I would submit to. 




TigerNINTails -> RE: The "I'm Stronger Than You" Game (7/6/2007 3:15:08 AM)

I don't know that it's so much a "game" as it is that they are as you put it, trying to prove something... That they have their own mind and their own opinions, though it's my belief that they are in fact going about it the wrong way.

To become argumentative, for the sake of argument, is not precisely the way to show strength... To me, it only highlights ignorance, especially if they presume to know more about something you might well know more about. However, I don't know that this is the case with you.

What I'm getting is that they are not secure in trusting you entirely, so they are "posturing" to let you know that they know (in regards to themselves) what is acceptable and what isn't, by letting you know they'll speak their mind.

Again, I don't see this as a game, but it is most definitely a power test, in my mind. Nothing entirely wrong with it, but it does smack of insecurity, if you put it in the correct context for it.

Part of the reason I told my ex-wife to kick rocks were power-ploys much like that, where near anything I said on nearly any subject soon became a target for argument, which gets tiring really really quickly.

These girls might just be testing waters, to see how you respond to challenge to your authority or knowledge.

In this case, when it comes down to you just meeting the girls, I'd look at it as if this is the time for mutual tests... They're testing your balance and your stability... So test their flexibility and obedience... If they truly are strong, they'll likely be able to handle whatever you throw at them... Within reason... If they're new to all this, that might overwhelm them, but you don't know until you test them.

And when I'm speaking about that, I'm talking about not just testing or feeling out physical limits, likes, loves, dislikes and total hatreds, but also how well they adapt to, accept, or at least analyze view points and philosophies.

Also, societally, we (Americans) in general treat our women as if they need to be as strong as the men in the society, both mentally and physically sometimes, so being "strong, independent, free thinking and acting" women is what they are being shown that "Good strong red blooded American men want".

In a BDSM context too, this is true, to a degree... I want a woman that can think on her feet, act independently, outline and analyze situations on her own and not depend on me for split second decisions... She also needs to be strong... She's gonna need to be able to handle what I dish out physically, and mentally, capable of dealing with how I speak verbally... Which can be a bit on the vulgar and rough side. I don't expect her to hold the world up... She doesn't have to be THAT independent, but certainly not dependent.

There's nothing wrong with some dependence... This allows the Top in the relationship to serve a purpose beyond "disciplinarian" or "captor" or "tormentor"... Now it gets into the realm of "protector", "guide" and "teacher". Perhaps, as the relationship grows, it gets into "lover" and "lord" or eventually even "master" if that's your bent.

Now, some people expect a slave or submissive to just obey, to do what she's told, not think about what she's going through, or question it, but honestly, considering that slaves and submissives are human beings, that's a fuckload of maneur[SP]... Human's just don't operate like that. Unless they're truly afraid of any sort of notice from someone, and that's not the way to be.

I would simply, upon noticing that, be direct and ask her why she's arguing about it... Find out why she's finding it necessary to conflict with you. You might be surprised at the answer. Especially if you don't hold onto any sort of pre-conception about it in the first place.

And in asking, be prepared to listen... I mean more than just what is said, but what isn't said. But don't assume anything, even after you have an answer. What is said, might not mean what it sounds like. So make sure you have a grip on the understanding, even if you have to ask if she means what you think she means.

In any case, I'm tired. It's way too f'n early in the morning. I hope that helps ya some MR. I'm out. Peace.




MagiksSlave -> RE: The "I'm Stronger Than You" Game (7/6/2007 4:05:33 AM)

I honestly think it is along the lines of, so many think subs are weak and need to be taken care of or worse try to take advantage of them, this seems like grasping any everything that they can in order to show you they arent weak, head you off at the pass so to speak to prevent you from takeing advantage of them. In their mind they may be truely showing you that you cant take advantage of them and what they dont realise is they are pushing you away. Its just a thought!

Magik's slave




Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125