meatcleaver -> RE: legalizing prostitution? (7/9/2007 6:33:59 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: apettiger i believe that if something is illegal and one does it anyway, then they must pay the price for breaking that law, even if that includes property forfitures or jail time. but what i am talking about is ending the chance of a single mother, with no marketable skills losing everything she has because she is doing her best to bring her children up in as normal a way as she can. i know from first hand experience that a moral few are not into it for the drugs or excitement, but to send their children to private schools or at the very least, supply them with a safe warm home, decent clothes, shoes and well balanced meals. if it is illegal when you do it, then you must pay the price for breaking the law, but i see this as a useless, harmful law law that should be struck down. and yes, the argument that "it will be done, illegal or not" opens the door for the statement "just because it will happen anyway is no reason to legalize something, murder happens anyway". but having prostitution illegal causes almost as much harm as making murder legal could. a lot of the people who work the streets (by the way there are a fair number of males that do this for a living too, so it is not all female) would embrace the idea of working out of an office and staying off the streets and would have no problem with working in a "zone" most of these people do not want to break up families (as stated before, many of them have children they are trying to raise). of course there are "crack whores" who do not care who, how, or where they ply their trade. it is not about bettering their or their childrens lives, but the drugs, but once it is regulated, the crack whores will diminish. mainly because they wont be able to find clients. who really would want to spend their money on somene who could very well kill them, either outright or later by some diesease? and of course there will eventually be corruption, hell there is corruption in most businesses and this would be an easy target. but even with the inherent corruption, the workers would be better off. As Bush has showed, laws are there to be broken when inconvenient. One shouldn't get too hung up about laws but be more interested in natural justice which is an entirely different issue. Laws that are perceived by the wider public to be unjust and/or irrelevent are routinely broken by a broad spectrum of the public. Just because politicians are hung up on image, irrelevent morals, doesn't mean that citizens have to kow tow to the altar of 'the rule of law' which is usually made in the interests of those in power. Prostitution like drugs, are not going to go away just because politicians make laws that prohibit them. If the legislature makes itself irrelevent to the ordinary lives of people, that is a problem for the legislature.
|
|
|
|