Caius
Posts: 175
Joined: 2/2/2005 Status: offline
|
In my book, 80 miles over the speed limit IS reckless driving, at least nominally. And I really couldn't care less how many yahoos think they and their mustangs are up to the task of executing deft manuvers at 150+ MPH. I happen to know a fair amount about the physical parameters of human response time, and let me tell you, people are rarely what they would like to believe in this respect. At least, certainly not to the degree that they can continue to push the envelope and not have the odds catch up with them. There are people out there, for crissake and many of them go to extraordinary lengths which cause them unumberable delays in their own lives to make sure they don't risk the safety of others. Now are there scenarios in which these rules can be safely ignored? Sure. But on average, if people are genuinely concerned about the safety of others around them, most of them would be well-advised to think more about slowing down than getting indignified by law in this area, especially when there are so many better thigns to be pissed about concerning your rights as a motorist. Or your rights in general, for that matter. I mean...we actually make travel two feet above the Earth's surface more dangerous than travel 50, 000 feet above it. How good can we really be, collectively? Unless you've been racing NASCAR recently, assuming you're above the mean is an ignorant and selfish indulgence in self-flattery. And while I'm no fan of invasive law, the reduction of such fines is gonna fall pretty short on my list of social injustices in need of immediate redress in America. When I hear people talk seriously about something like this being a factor in whether they support someone's command of an office, when leaders of any degree of power have almost universally shrunk from seriously addressing problems of dire and global significance in recent time..... I must, however, concede to velvetears' point. There are plenty of places where the situation has simply evolved to a point where going the posted speed limit can be a dangerous move. But typically we're then talking about places where the much broader problem of population density makes it nearly impossible for the region to function without some speed. And to the OP, or anyone else inclined to respond, I certainly agree that a thousand dollar fine for 20 over is a steep proposition for many people and resonably regarded as over-the-top. But every little bit over that carries you exponentially closer to statistically signifcant risk. Personally, I can appreciate that people have a love of speed, but I've always felt that if one is really going to indulge it they should at least get a motorcycle or at the very least a smaller car so as to be more likely to be the one smeared over the asphalt or crumpled into steel. Just some thoughts from someone who's seen enough of the results of individuals failing to realize the extent of their abilities in this realm for one lifetime. Ahem. Peace.
< Message edited by Caius -- 7/10/2007 4:52:23 AM >
|