Elorin -> RE: † Micro managing † (7/9/2007 6:33:23 PM)
|
Micromanagement can be overwhelming for the dom/me, and a lot of work. I have a slave who would like to be completely micromanaged, but wants me to think it all out ahead of time and have elaborate scripts for him to follow when I can't be there for our nightly phone call that exhausts me. In return, he gets it some of the time but when I'm busy/sick/etc he doesn't get it. However, in small doses - I.E. planning for a high protocol weekend or other things - micromanagement can make me feel a power exchange very intimately. Having to ask everytime you go pee makes you ~much~ more aware of the process, and can make you feel humiliated and controlled, or empowered (depending on your role). As a top, if someone asks me everytime they pee, I giggle sadistically in my head everytime I'm asked. That muah ha ha ha kind of laugh that just envisions them sitting at the door doing a peepee dance because I asked for privacy, debating on knocking or pissing themselves. As a bottom, asking to go pee makes me feel very humbled and owned. As a person, permission to pee everytime I have to pee gets grating after too long, so it has to be a limited time frame. I find most forms of micromanagement to be this way. In certain doses, they enhance the power exchange, but for too long and they became a drain, grating on the nerves and wearing on the relationship. cjenny My definition of micromanagement is that the sub isn't allowed any form of choice in the subject being micromanaged. I find being told to go with out panties daily to be a rule, but having to call him every day and ask "what pair of panties do I wear today?" to be micromanagement. Same goes for what I eat, how I spend my money, all the other clothes I wear. General guidelines feel like control, but having to call and ask each time "may I spend $.35 for a soda? May I spend 4.00 at the gas station for donuts? May I put gas in my tank?" is micromanagement. ~E
|
|
|
|