Dominant Females

Dominant Females (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress

Message

sissypetticoat -> Dominant Females (7/11/2007 3:54:12 PM)
Why do more women realize that if they turned their husbands into little sissies, they would not have to clean or cook and they would not cheat on them and would do whatever they asked?

Red82 -> RE: Dominant Females (7/11/2007 3:56:11 PM)
hmmm.... Just a thought here, but they dont have to be "little sissies" to do that.

mercurialis -> RE: Dominant Females (7/11/2007 4:23:33 PM)
Because not everyone likes what you like? Some women picked their husbands because they're anything but sissy, and those with some really nice relationships probably have that nice man do housework too. Sorry, but this just sounds like a whine post about how not everyone has your fetish. Sorry, but it's hardly other people's fault.

Cloudz -> RE: Dominant Females (7/11/2007 4:25:48 PM)
To the OP, Post #1 is a whine? Good luck to you...someone will be along to pass the cheese anytime now.

SDFemDom4cuck -> RE: Dominant Females (7/11/2007 4:52:10 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Cloudz To the OP, Post #1 is a whine? Good luck to you...someone will be along to pass the cheese anytime now. I have some Merlot...I think a nice Brie would go well with it.

Lashra -> RE: Dominant Females (7/11/2007 5:07:57 PM)
My sub does all of that and he isn't a sissy, unless I tell him to put on his maids outfit. ~Lashra

Grlwithboy -> RE: Dominant Females (7/11/2007 5:21:11 PM)
I don't mind cooking and my sub has to hold down a job as well as do the dishes?

OrangeJulius -> RE: Dominant Females (7/11/2007 6:03:00 PM)
Because BDSM isn't for everyone. People have been trying to do this forever, and I doubt that masking it in leather is going to solve anything. Bread and circuses eventually stopped working, and so would this. My point is, without the man actually wanting to be a slave, he won't be for long.

DiurnalVampire -> RE: Dominant Females (7/11/2007 6:05:21 PM)
I am also fairly sure all the submissive wives out there would be terribly upset if they turned their husbands into little sissies. Come now, variety makes the world go round. And I hate to break it to you, but being submissive doesnt gaurantee fidelity. If you think it does, thats going to bite you in the ass at some point. DV

rick19 -> RE: Dominant Females (7/11/2007 6:11:34 PM)
As infantile as this guys post was, he does have a point. I think women, dominant or not, DO have the subconscious power to make their husbands do stuff for them. This is some pretty interesting reading here: http://www.livescience.com/health/070711_woman_boss.html

PairOfDimes -> RE: Dominant Females (7/11/2007 6:14:46 PM)
Presumably, the trade isn't worth it for many women. I've had some rewarding domestic service relationships, and I've had some that were more work than they were worth. And while I think some MTF crossdressers are hot, and some are nice people, I'm sad to say that the service relationships that turned out to be unrewarding were all with self-defined "sissy maids."

DiurnalVampire -> RE: Dominant Females (7/11/2007 6:16:29 PM)
I dont deny when I was a wife, even in a vanilla marraige, I was able to make my husband do what I wanted. I didnt have to make him a sissy slave to do it.

Najakcharmer -> RE: Dominant Females (7/11/2007 8:00:42 PM)
Yeah. And why don't all those pesky heterosexual vanilla people just go ahead and admit that they are actually gay and into fisting? Everyone knows there's only one true sexual orientation in the world, and people of other orientations are just spending their whole lives faking it.

littlesarbonn -> RE: Dominant Females (7/11/2007 8:56:38 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Cloudz To the OP, Post #1 is a whine? Good luck to you...someone will be along to pass the cheese anytime now. Hey, cheese is my thing. (points to personal profile that is ALL about the cheese)

SweetDommes -> RE: Dominant Females (7/11/2007 9:49:49 PM)
Because 1 - we got cheated on by a submissive, so obviously, orientation has NOTHING to do with fidelity 2 - sissies are entirely unappealing to us. I don't want someone who spends more time, money and effort on clothing than I do (or than he does on me).

OrangeJulius -> RE: Dominant Females (7/11/2007 9:59:40 PM)
Yo, I beg to differ. Some people dig the sissy.

SweetDommes -> RE: Dominant Females (7/11/2007 10:06:17 PM)
us ... as in Holly and myself ... not speaking for anyone else - just pointing out that there are Dominant Women out and about who aren't at all interested in sissies. I find it interesting that even though both of my points were obviously personal, you seemed to think that I was generalizing for all or most Dommes ... particularly when I have a history of objecting when someone over-generalizes ...

DSwriter -> RE: Dominant Females (7/11/2007 10:26:23 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: OrangeJulius Some people dig the sissy. Probably. But aren't some Woman also going to want a mate they can feel proud of? The word "sissy" implies someone that is spineless, that can't stand up for himself, who has no self-respect, and glories in his own weakness. A man that submits to a Female-led relationship is not necessarily a coward, weak or without physical strength and ability. A man that brings certain strengths to the relationship is going to win more respect from his Domme than a sissy. And i've noticed that some Women seem to prefer dominating a strong man, rather than someone that caves in and throws their ass up in the air too easily.

Red82 -> RE: Dominant Females (7/11/2007 11:11:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DSwriter quote: ORIGINAL: OrangeJulius Some people dig the sissy. Probably. But aren't some Woman also going to want a mate they can feel proud of? The word "sissy" implies someone that is spineless, that can't stand up for himself, who has no self-respect, and glories in his own weakness. A man that submits to a Female-led relationship is not necessarily a coward, weak or without physical strength and ability. A man that brings certain strengths to the relationship is going to win more respect from his Domme than a sissy. And i've noticed that some Women seem to prefer dominating a strong man, rather than someone that caves in and throws their ass up in the air too easily. The word "slave" also implies withheld freedom against ones will. In this lifestyle however, we use the word in a different context. I believe the same goes for the word "sissy" in this instance. Are you to imply that a Dominant Woman would not be proud of a male "sissy" slave?

LadyHugs -> RE: Dominant Females (7/12/2007 12:17:07 AM)
Dear sissypetticoat, Ladies and Gentlemen; I can only speak for my personal preferences -- I wouldn't want a sissy for a husband--that is why I am still single; and it doesn't even associate with wearing frilly and frocks. Just some thoughts. Respectfully submitted for consideration, Lady Hugs

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875