pixelslave -> RE: The thing I keep missing (not a complaint, but an observation) (7/17/2007 12:22:45 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: littlesarbonn I apologize, but I will discontinue contributing to the thread from hereon, mainly because the back and forth that has gone on has actually derailed the original intention of this thread into commentaries that are part of the fill in the blank commentaries that come from other threads, like "I do things my way, and therefore I don't play games" which actually is feeding into the problem I was talking about before. Sorry littlesarbonn, but I think that's a lame excuse. Threads have a life of their own and wander around wherever they happen to go. Entire wars have been fought in the middle of some before they ever began to get on track or to the intended subject. If you didn't get the feedback or the enlightened discussion you were looking for, it's entirely your choice as to whether or not to attempt to further explain to the rest of us what you were trying to communicate to those of us who apparently don't seem to "get it" from what was in your OP. [>:] quote:
For my last comment on this thread (forgetting about 90 percent of what has been printed in this thread), the point is that over the last decade, relationships in bdsm seem to have turned into D/s-lite because instead of the environment AFTER the negotiation, relationships still tend to be watered down with "I don't have to put my foot down because if he doesn't want to serve me, then I don't want him". Unfortunately, nearly everything in our society today is considered "disposable"; particularly people when it comes to relationships. I don't think you can expect to negotiate a relationship without first taking the time to get to know someone. If you do, I think something is amiss. The point being, IMO, there needs to be a bond of some kind before there's a negotiation in order for a genuine relationship to exist. Otherwise, neither party has anything invested in the relationship, only in the negotiation process. That's one of the things that makes things awkward or difficult for both women and men when first meeting each other in this lifestyle. [&:] quote:
What has happened, and I kind of suspected this myself, is that the whole spectrum of bdsm has moved so far to one end that practically EVERYONE in it responds from the edges of that new spectrum, incapable of observing anything that exists outside of the present limitations. Aren't you really saying "Different strokes for different folks?" without further explaining or describing what your preferred stroke is like? [8|] quote:
Now, an immediate response may be to argue with me or tell me how I'm wrong, or whatever, but please don't. Continue the thread as you were all doing. My contributions further are irrelevant as I don't feel anyone actually understood what I was saying in the first place because people kept trying to cookie cutter what I said into what everyone has been discussing in so many other threads rather than take it the next step. And that's okay. I was trying to address something much deeper than the standard conversations we had here, and I failed. I don't want to argue with you at all, only to understand what you were trying to communicate to us. But as it's "much deeper than the standard conversations here", thanks for sharing your last word on the subject in such a condescending manner! [image]http://www.collarchat.com/micons/m23.gif[/image] - pixel Collared to Majik
|
|
|
|