Najakcharmer
Posts: 2121
Joined: 5/3/2004
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: aSlavesLife
Nah! The mods only slam you if you dare to trade insults with one of their buddies. As long as you sit quietly and let the moderators pets flame to their hearts content, you are safe from the big mean mods.
Thing is, from your perspective it may look that way. From an overworked mod's perspective, it can look quite different. They don't necessarily have time to read every single post on the board; they step in when they're explcitly called for, and moderate based on what they see. If Person X stepped over the line two hundred and sixty-seven posts ago in another thread, and Person Y just stepped over the same line on a thread where a mod was just called in by Person Z, guess who's going to get moderated. It probably won't be Person X, because the mod is a volunteer who doesn't have time to find the other thread and read two hundred and sixty seven posts back. This will inevitably result in cries of favoritism, when in fact Mod Seventeen (or whichever moderator it is) who actually laid the smackdown may not know any of the people involved on the thread at all.
I moderate on a science board that can get as bad as this one in terms of sheer nastiness, though academics usually go about it with longer words rather than four letter words. Usually, though not always. Anyhow, the dynamics of how moderation works is the same whether it's a kinky site or not, and the folks who get moderated are always likely to percieve unfairness and favoritism whether that's what is really happening or not. Most of what's behind the apparent inequities in a volunteer mod system is a simple lack of time to delve deeply enough into any given issue, beyond making the crap stop that needs to stop. Generally a mod is likely to do that, and then stop looking.
Community moderators do not have time to convene a jury trial and a grand scale investigation for every offense committed on a message board forum. They're just going to do what they have to do in the moment to keep the board functioning for everyone. Inequalities will result. Such is life on the Internet.
I'm not saying that it is impossible for some favoritism to occur. I don't know the situation here or the moderators here well enough to speak to that. I do know how community moderation works, and how apparent favoritism and inequality can very easily be the result of limited staff time to keep a very large community functioning. I would suggest considering these possibilities before deciding that every decision here that you do not like is a result of malice or personal bias.
< Message edited by Najakcharmer -- 7/23/2007 12:00:46 PM >
|
RE: to the moderators - 
Profile
RE: to the moderators - 
, I enjoyed reading his input because at least he provided a balance and offered another viewpoint. I wonder if his opinions were simply less acceptable than the opinions of those who continue to rant on the "other side" of those issues. He didn't seem to be any more offensive or attack anymore than the others he often argued with in the "Off Topic" forum. Not sure why he was tossed and they weren't. Only the mods know and their decisions are indeed final. 
but, fortunately, 99% of the folks here have evolved past that (and yes, I did do a scientific study on that)
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread