|
MadRabbit -> RE: What's in a name? (7/23/2007 5:49:41 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MASTERLIX
I think it is wise that you have put some thoughts into this. What you said that particularly struck my attention was when you said, "the fact I'm an admitted novice on many subjects, it seems to be claiming expertise that doesn't exist and demanding respect that hasn't been earned."
Usually, when name tags are used, they are supposed to be used based on training in the lifestyle. There is a difference a sub and a slave. While one can be a slave and a sub, one cannot be a sub and a slave. Meaning, you have to have had some trainings as a sub to become a slave and in the most cases collared.
Then, when it comes to being a Master, Sir or Lord, not every Dom is a Master, Sir or Lord. You have to have also had trainings to be considered those tags. So do Domme and Mistress. So, it will be completely pretentious to give yourself a tag that you do not really have full knowledge of.
My advice is that for now, just use any regular vanilla tag until you are trained appropriately. And as for your lady, I also don't think she would really qualify to be called "slave Mindi" if she does not have any basic training to be a slave.
Those are just my views.
Sir Lix
Wow...thank God, I skipped over this post at first when reading this thread.
Otherwise, I would have stepped right into a pile of horseshit..
|
|
|
|
