RE: Nipple Bigotry (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message

Vendaval -> RE: Nipple Bigotry (7/27/2007 10:47:30 PM)

Hey, you never had to wear the bullet bras and girdles of that era.
They were not exactly designed for comfort.


quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelOfGeorgia
what i find funny is that, in the 60s, women burned their bras (for whatever reason, doesn't matter to me), yet, now, women are told they have to cover up? doesn't anyone else find this amusing?



Vendaval -> RE: Nipple Bigotry (7/27/2007 10:50:03 PM)

The same is true when a man takes off his shirt, you wonder how much chest hair will be there and if it is straight or curly.


quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy

Although it is kind of like getting a toy out of a box of cracker jacks...When you raise the shirt or bra of a women...You never quite know what you are going to find there....Part of the mystery.




Vendaval -> RE: Nipple Bigotry (7/27/2007 10:56:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: gooddogbenji

I just want to say that the Adam's apple is an organ relating to a gender, or whatever CL stated earlier.

Another big difference is the location and amount of body and facial hair.

Cover up, you dirty bastards!

(Puts hands over my ....)

Knees, also (apparently) are different on men and women. 

So are hips!  Shake that ass girl!

And, I have just learned, I need to cover my ankles when my cock is flaccid.  Go figure.

And when it is erect?

Yours,


benji

How is your summer going, benji?




Vendaval -> RE: Nipple Bigotry (7/27/2007 11:01:27 PM)

Anyone else remember when former Attorney General Ashcroft covered up the bare breast on the statue of justice at the DOJ?
That cost the US taxpayers something around $30,000 because of the size of that giant bronze breast.


quote:

ORIGINAL: LdyScarletDomina

... I agree that at this point in modern USA the breast has gone from a natural food receptical to being repressed based on someone else's moral/sexual fears! 

Lady Scarlet



Vendaval -> RE: Nipple Bigotry (7/27/2007 11:09:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

Anyway...

The movement goes on, seeking nothing but equal ability, not mandating or requiring anything.

Keep up the good er...work?  [:-]


I started chatting with some of the walking and bike riding policeman patrolling the South Bay. The fun part in the discussions I've had with the people on enforcement side of this issue is that, after they smile and laugh at the thought of beth taking off her top and wearing nipple looking nipple pasties, they say that they would have to call their Sargent to determine how to proceed.


Maybe their Sergeant will want to inspect the pasties in question?  [8|]


The only warning we got was if the event became a "public nuisance". The definition of public nuisance is so broad that a group of 10 Elvis impersonators qualifies.

Hell, that would annoy me if their sound system was turned up too loud.
But pasties are silent, meant to be seen and not heard.   [X(]


The big issue to determine at this point is concern over beth being considered a "sex offender". From the law books and the couple hundred dollar phone call to an attorney, that really is the "worse case". But she, the lawyer, loves the idea of this making a great test case. I tried to recruit her to the event, but no luck so far.

You pervs!  [:D]

Stay tuned.




ErusUxor -> RE: Nipple Bigotry (7/27/2007 11:42:37 PM)

Ok...Master said I could post just for this one topic...I couldn't resist

Hey!  I thought it was my Idea... damn.....

Standing their at Madame S.......latex dress making sweat pool in interesting places....and I thought hey.....nipple colored pasties.....LOL

Of course BossyShoeBitch has  cornered the market on the strawberry pasties....she deserves that patent..LOL...especially after her spiritual experience on the trampoline.



ErusUxor -> RE: Nipple Bigotry (7/27/2007 11:58:05 PM)

I am absolutley ready to stand up and protest with beth.

I have to question the law from this perspective.....

sexual organs covered up? hmmmm...what legally constitutes "sexual organs"? Seems to me the part of the female breast that can logically be considered a "secondary sexual charateristic" is the breast mound itself, not the nipple. We all have nipples, Men, women, 3 year olds, chimpanzies, dogs , cats, pretty much any mammel (male and female)

Not all of us have breast "mounds" though...and what about the men that do.... why don't they qualify? Oh the curiousity.....

Hey, I'm all for making men cover their chests too.....But it should be one way or the other...covered or uncovered for both genders.

oh how about this.....shouldn't chest hair be a sexual organ? It is, after all, a secondary sex characteristic that women do not have? It only occurs after puberty.... pondering the possibilities...

So my question is this...how is "sexual organ" defined. Because if it has something to do with sexual arousal... the question needs to be posed...who's sexual arousal is in question....

If it is a sexual organ if the owner of the nipples can be aroused by having them touched... then uh oh.....houston...we have a problem....

If It is a sexual organ because someone else can be aroused by viewing that organ...well then thongs (the kind you wear on your feet) should be outlawed..

Yep...Its time that somebody freed the much opressed nipples...LOL




bignipples2share -> RE: Nipple Bigotry (7/28/2007 1:30:12 AM)

Fast Reply
To Whom It May Concern,

http://www.answerbag.com/q_view/2317

Woman do have an adam's apple, it just shows less noticeably.

When the larynx or voicebox grows larger during puberty, it sticks out at the front of the throat. This is what's called an Adam's Apple. Everyone's larynx grows during puberty, but a girl's larynx doesn't grow as much as a boy's does. This larger larynx gives boys deeper voices.

The primary purpose of the larynx is to close off the airway when swallowing. The closure of the vocal folds, in addition to other forms of constriction, protects the lungs from the aspiration of food or liquid into the airway. The second purpose of the larynx is to create voice. Within the larynx are the vocal folds, which are responsible for producing sound, or phonation.

Men generally have a deeper voice than women and to accomodate for this differnce, their voice box, which is referred to as the Adam's Apple in men, has more muscles in it, to produce a deeper sound, thus it is more prominent, whereas women have a soft voice, so their larynx does not have such features and they have a smaller voice box, and no visible Adam's Apple

Since these are just answers from someone on the internet, one cannot assume what they’re saying is factual, just because they said it. Without tedious investigation as to who they are and what credentials they hold, their credibility is questionable.


http://www.gbmc.org/voice/anatomyphysiologyofthelarynx.cfm

The above link directs one to a medical health care facility. It explains the Adam’s Apple and it’s function.

http://www.wrongdiagnosis.com/medical/throat.htm

The above link is a medical dictionary, which will explain the throat as an organ.

Throat (organ): The cavity at the back of the oral region
Throat (organ): The throat is properly called the "pharynx". The throat is used for breathing by the respiratory system, to ingest food for the digestive system, and to emit sounds from the voice box.
Throat (organ): See Throat (organ information).
More information on organs: Throat:
 
http://www.wrongdiagnosis.com/medical/voice_box.htm

Link explains the voice box which includes the cartilage and that cartilage is usually larger than that of the females, making men’s usually larger Adam’s Apples vs. women’s smaller Adam’s Apples gender specific.

Though I’ve only listed one website for each section, there are several credible links on the net, not just one or two.

Now all we need is a bunch of people to say the neck is sexual, slap it in a book someplace, make it a law that sexual organs need to be covered up and whaaaalaaaaaa

Mmmmm........All men will be heavily collared.    


~Big



CuriousLord -> RE: Nipple Bigotry (7/28/2007 8:48:24 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ErusUxor

I am absolutley ready to stand up and protest with beth.

I have to question the law from this perspective.....

sexual organs covered up? hmmmm...what legally constitutes "sexual organs"? Seems to me the part of the female breast that can logically be considered a "secondary sexual charateristic" is the breast mound itself, not the nipple. We all have nipples, Men, women, 3 year olds, chimpanzies, dogs , cats, pretty much any mammel (male and female)


Ugh.  I was hoping this thread had died.  So tired of the half-baked indigiant rants on how boobs are oppressed.  Fine, here's a repsonse.

I'm giving the prospective of those who want boobs covered up.  To them, they're a sexual thing.  "Sexual organ" is a term I used to express this, which is, yes, linguisticly correct.  I never said it was a legal term.  Gah.  So many damn assumptions.

Hell, I even addressed why it's the nipples.  How conservative individuals see the breast as sexual, yet how do you determine if a boob is covered up?  The standards have been giving way, and now the judgement point is, more or less, "Is the nipple covered up?"

Look.  I love intelligent debate.  And I can respect it your decision- to some extent or another- if you wish to live a more simplistic life where you rabidly argue for things you want.  But we see things differently.  I like to understand all points of view, and I realize that I'm getting a hostile reaction for even expressing the conversative point of view in an attempt to establish a basis for an honest intellectual inquarary.

So, for the purposes of this site, which is, escentually, based on sex- "Go boobs!"  Have fun with them.

PS-  If you are interested in the differentiation between sexual organs, you may see Post #130 on this thread.  As stated in this post, it's not about if something is a sexual organ or not so much as to the degree to which one perceives it to be a sexual organ.



mnottertail -> RE: Nipple Bigotry (7/28/2007 9:12:13 AM)

HEY!!!! even men don't think THIS much about tits.



CuriousLord -> RE: Nipple Bigotry (7/28/2007 9:51:44 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

HEY!!!! even men don't think THIS much about tits.


I wouldn't describe what men do with relation to tits as "thinking".


 
 
 
 
PS-  Go dry humor.



Level -> RE: Nipple Bigotry (7/28/2007 10:03:16 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

Wouldn't seem so.  It lacks a purpose so far as I know.



The purpose of the adam's apple is to help know which hookers to avoid. [X(]




CuriousLord -> RE: Nipple Bigotry (7/28/2007 10:12:12 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Level
quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

Wouldn't seem so.  It lacks a purpose so far as I know.
The purpose of the adam's apple is to help know which hookers to avoid. [X(]


Ah.. so this is why turtle necks are big on street corners, eh?


Plenty of adam's apple stuff above.  I think they're happy they were able to find information on something that I said I didn't know about.  ;)



Vendaval -> RE: Nipple Bigotry (7/28/2007 3:16:59 PM)

ROFLMAO!!!   [sm=biggrin.gif][sm=bust.gif][sm=shake.gif]


quote:

ORIGINAL: Level

The purpose of the adam's apple is to help know which hookers to avoid. [X(]




Mercnbeth -> RE: Nipple Bigotry (7/29/2007 7:23:49 AM)

Remember, this is about nipples not breasts. Woman can show as much breast as they want. It's woman's nipples that are "obscene". No reference I can find documents any difference in the genders for that relatively tiny section of skin, or why men's are visually not taboo in public. Cover up the nipple and you comply with the law.

The question is, what if you covered with a pastie that looks like a nipple? What if you covered it with a pastie that looks like a male nipple, complete with hair?!! The collection of nipples we're getting is a good start for generating compliant opaque nipple cover-ups.

I think we just need a catchy name. So far...
  • "I can't believe they're not nipples!"
  • "Tips-4-Tits"
  • "Naughty Bits"

quote:

ORIGINAL: ErusUxor
Ok...Master said I could post just for this one topic...I couldn't resist
Hey!  I thought it was my Idea... damn.....
Standing their at Madame S.......latex dress making sweat pool in interesting places....and I thought hey.....nipple colored pasties.....LOL
Of course BossyShoeBitch has  cornered the market on the strawberry pasties....she deserves that patent..LOL...especially after her spiritual experience on the trampoline.


You, BSB, and beth will be the models for the catalog and share in the patent rights - okay?

I bet the dress from Madame S looks GREAT! Good luck next weekend! We wish we could be there!



spankmepink11 -> RE: Nipple Bigotry (7/29/2007 8:25:26 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord


They.. are.. the.. dictionary.. defined.. it.  Gah.  Temper tandrum- damn straight.  You're obnixously slow.


And you, are just obnoxious. 
 Breasts were defined directly from the dictionary in the post immediately following mine, and no where in said definition was the term "sexual" organ part of the definition.   I checked The Merriam -Webster definition as well as the American Heritage dictionary definition.



michaelOfGeorgia -> RE: Nipple Bigotry (7/29/2007 8:27:35 AM)

ok, i admit it...i'm a nipple biggot. i love female nipples, but not males'

LOL



Mercnbeth -> RE: Nipple Bigotry (7/29/2007 8:40:34 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelOfGeorgia

ok, i admit it...i'm a nipple bigot. i love female nipples, but not males'
LOL

michael -
Ahhhh, refreshing honesty without the need of contrived rationalization. How do you feel about seeing them publicly without being required to pay?

beth's awaiting a picture of yours for the catalog. I trust you won't be concerned that it may be used as fodder for mens masturbatory fantasies. NIPPLE only please! NO "sexual organs" self, or dictionary defined!

she's really getting carried away with this project. This morning she was chasing after the dogs to get a close up of their nipples. They are both male and 'K-9' in the dictionary definition of the term. Therefore displaying their nipples should not be a legal issue. Besides she thinks it will go over big with those into public puppy play.



michaelOfGeorgia -> RE: Nipple Bigotry (7/29/2007 8:42:22 AM)

are you kidding me?



Mercnbeth -> RE: Nipple Bigotry (7/29/2007 8:50:04 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelOfGeorgia
are you kidding me?

Sitting here together, naked in bed early on a Sunday morning, drinking coffee and having the LOGO channel on in the background, a great tag-line comes to mind: "Are we having fun, yet?"

But if you are so inclined, the project is real and beth has the Hollywood make-up latex and paint n order. A MoG nipple pastie could be a reality!



Page: <<   < prev  5 6 7 [8] 9   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625