Is BDSM just shallow? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


callofzion -> Is BDSM just shallow? (7/30/2007 12:56:20 AM)

Ooh, my first thread, I'm so excited. Anyway, I've been reading for a while now, and I'm stumped by a certain attitiude which I see in prevalence. The most recent example was in a thread where someone was asking what would happen if a submissive refused punishment, and several answers responded in the vein that the relationship would immediately be over. I've seen it all over these boards, Doms saying that they would terminate a relationship entirely if say, a punishment was refused, or if a submissive demanded something of them, or some such other offence.

Out of curiosity, can and do Dom/mes REALLY cut submissives out entirely if they disobey or do some such other thing? I'm not talking about if the sub was abusive or overtly idiotic, I'm talking about a submissive who the Dom is fond of, maybe loves, and has an otherwise good relationship with, would they really throw the whole relationship out the window just like that?

If so, how deeply do they really feel for the sub? How trusting can the sub really be when a slip of submission will lead to total rejection? It somehow looks and feels flakey to me when people seem to have their whole dominance based on 'do it or get the hell out'. It doesn't feel  like a dominant thing to do, in fact, it almost seems like working from a place of weakness. Having said that, obviously if your sub isn't submitting then you don't have much of a dynamic going, and I do understand the breach of the D/s trust that would cause, but really, is it just over so quickly and simply? Or is this just domly bluster?




michaelOfGeorgia -> RE: Is BDSM just shallow? (7/30/2007 12:58:30 AM)

BDSM isn't shallow, at least not offline. it's the online crap you have to put up with.




callofzion -> RE: Is BDSM just shallow? (7/30/2007 12:59:52 AM)

Hmm, it looks like someone read the topic and not the post.. how very naughty...




Jhin -> RE: Is BDSM just shallow? (7/30/2007 1:03:52 AM)

In my experience I have never had this kind of attitude come across.. I've have had masters bend me over for saying no.. but most of my pasters are very happy to take a request, will my full knowledge that when asking for something it is and is never more than a request, something my master very well may use against me




MasterMike04103 -> RE: Is BDSM just shallow? (7/30/2007 1:07:39 AM)

Let me start off by asking this... Why do you think these people who talk it up as being so damn great on here are still single after all these weeks/years?  I will tell you right now that alot of the Tops on here, will be here for 20 more years, because, they are filled with online life misconseptions, Dungeon and Dragon style roll play fantisies, and at most, will maybe get a couple boobie shots from girls who don't know any better... When you ask these Tops how the local scene is, they couldn't tell you, because they are meerly keyboard Tops... Nothing more, Nothing less...

Its sad to say, but most of these people who have the God complex, wouldn't last 10 minutes in a real life BDSM relationship. I agree with my Brother from georgia whom I share the namesake of Michael... Real time is a whole different ball game...

Blessings,

Mike




came4U -> RE: Is BDSM just shallow? (7/30/2007 1:10:51 AM)

Refusing punishment? as in it was a hard limit? or just not tolerating any form of punishment?

I dunno, if you are talking online, sure, they (Doms) might be more likely to move on to a gal who submits easier/faster.  Real life, who knows, it depends on the person.

Assuming you mean a real life relationship...if she refuses punishment (more than once, more than 10x), of course she might be dumped. If she agreed in initial stages that punishment would be a given, why would he accept her defiant behavior? Who is he to be blamed for being the bad guy because he is the 'dumper' not the 'dumpee'. 

Who knows what goes on into the minds of others, but people will choose to stay or go, for whatever the reason. 

But, what the hell do I know. lol




callofzion -> RE: Is BDSM just shallow? (7/30/2007 1:20:08 AM)

Hiya, no I don't mean as a hard limit, I mean like, as in it's RL, you're in a D/s relationship with this person and have been for a while, and you know, there is some attachment there, and the Dom tells the sub to take a punishment, and for whatever reason (temper, doesn't feel it's fair, some other reason) the sub says no. Does the Dom/me really just kick the sub out there and then? There are MANY who claim to be like this on the boards around here, but I just wonder how realistic that is, and how scary that might be if it is realistic...




BoiJen -> RE: Is BDSM just shallow? (7/30/2007 1:23:33 AM)

So here's an example of I'm trying it just isn't enough it going out the window...


Heavy intense super hot scene...clothespins being flogged off...cutting canes breaking over a bare ass...needles...spanking ...face slapping...the whole 9 and at the end She says...

"Now look at Me and tell Me 'Iam worthy and She did it in Her own time'" and I can't. Because I can't lie to Her. And I don't want to disappoint Her by not being able to do as She's said. She says "Tell Me or we won't be doing this again." I couldn't

I'm still here. I don't refuse punishment. I guess if I was having difficulty with something we'd end up having to talk about why She'll end up pushing me past it. Cuz that's what She does. And if in the end it was a punishment I refused...by the end of the conversation I'm so drained anyways that I couldn't physically stop Her anyways. Much less say "no"."

Then again I don't tell Her "no." I don't think all cases of refusal are breaking points...I think some are but not all.




SusanofO -> RE: Is BDSM just shallow? (7/30/2007 1:24:57 AM)

Wow, I remember thinking the exact same thing when I first became a CollarMe member (I really do). Some of what I read really scared me, even though I was very much attracted to BDSM and the idea of D/s. After awhile, I learned that some people in the BDSM world have had very enduring and fulfilling D/s relationships. 

And, even though the relationships are D/s, I am quite sure there are Doms (and Mistresses) who would be absolutely devastated if their submissive walked out the door, or if their relationship deteriorated to the point where they felt they had to "let them go".

I've seen some post to that effect, and I believe it's true. These are the folks who know how to work on things like communication, and want to build a real, lasting relationship. I've also seen what appear to be some very dedicated submissives and slaves.

Some people aren't necessarily looking for a lasting relationship. That's okay, too, IMO - it doesn't mean they don't know anything about BDSM, it just means their needs are different I guess. In  either case, they are going to have to establish some kind of quality communication if they expect to "scene" with you, or ask you to "scene" with them (at least that would be the case for me).

Sure there are plenty of shallow Doms - and subs, and well, just people. Just like outside of the BDSM "world."

I have come to believe there are people who are just plain bad at relationships in general - and they become attracted to the ideas of D/s, thinking it will solve their "relationship problems" due to thinking that suddenly, within a  D/s relationship, they'll have this submissive whom they think just has to do "everything they say" and they will not have to contribute much, if anything, to the relationship, or put in any effort to maintain it.

Hmmm.

Well, maybe that's true - for some people (but it doesn't really sound like the "norm", in a good D/s relationship, to me) - in any case, it is only after they've won his or her heart and respect. That doesn't mean that respect can automatically go out the window, after the person is "collared", or after they state they are "committed" to them, either - **because a submissive or a slave - no matter what anybody tells you - can very easily walk right out the door (the relationship) anytime - just as easily as a Dom or Master (or Mistress) can end it.

The same can be said of some submissives - who think life is just going to magically become a lot less complicated now that someone else is making "all of the decisions". Well, maybe it will - and maybe not. But, even if that is some major impetus for entering a D/s relationship for a submissive (and I imagine everyone has their own reasons for wanting a D/s relationship) -  that still doesn't mean (to me anyway) a Dominant necessarily wants to deal with a partner who hasn't got their head screwed on straight.

I think there are probably plenty of people involved in BDSM (from what I've seen and read) who are involved in it because they find it a deeply fulfilling way to live, and are good, mature people who have real and fulfilling relationships.

I can think of one couple here who are a shining example of that (Mercnbeth, as one example, and Knight ofMists and his Poly family, and there are many others here also). I know I've met a couple of real nice folks who are into BDSM in my own life, too. There seem to be more than a few nice people around in the BDSM "world". I hope you get to meet some of them, too.   

- Susan




ownedgirlie -> RE: Is BDSM just shallow? (7/30/2007 1:36:12 AM)

Hello callofzion,

BDSM is a physical activity, so I suppose it could be shallow for some, and wildly intense and spiritual for others.  D/s (Dominance/submission) and M/s (Master/slave) may be what you're asking about, as those are relationship dynamics.

Yes, my Master loves me.  I love and adore him.  But the dynamic of our relationship is based upon the fact that I am his slave, and he is my Master and owner.  Without that authority and power dynamic in place, we would not have what we both want so very much.  Were I to behave in a way that falls outside that dynamic, then I have removed myself from his authority, and have destroyed the dynamic.  We could both find "vanilla" relationships anywhere.  That is not what we want or need from each other.   When I stop submitting to him, I am not longer being his slave, and I am no longer being true to myself.

This doesn't mean one small goof and out the door I go.  It means I give all of myself, and I strive to reach perfection in my slavery to him.  I'll never reach perfection, but I won't stop trying to reach it, either.  In my effort, I'm going to make mistakes.  I'm going to have to shed baggage and tear down walls.  Such things will get in the way of my overall goal, and will cause us both problems that will have to be contended with.  As long as he sees my effort, he is more than happy to keep me, in fact he prefers to keep me.  But if I were to have a laissez-faire attitude, and submit only when I wanted or only when convenient for me, I would not be his slave, as I would not fit the definition  that we both agree a slave to be.

By blatantly disobeying or refusing an order or a decision of his, I am effectively deciding against his authority.  And if I am choosing against his authority, then I am choosing something other than my slavery.  And since our relationship is contingent upon him being the Master and me being the slave, I would basically be choosing to step out of the relationship.

Shallow?  Hell no.  This is the deepest relationship I've ever had, and the most important to me, too.  It deserves my respect.  It is sacred to me.  So I have no reason to step away from it, hence I have no reason to refuse him or what he decides for me.

I hope that helps...




came4U -> RE: Is BDSM just shallow? (7/30/2007 1:39:23 AM)

Dispensability.

One reason why some avoid getting their feet wet.

Yes, it is a big risk. But, I hope you don't refer to being moved in and having the 'no' word come up and it being held over someone's head in order that they are in fear of living on the streets.  That is not a good negotiation-able Dominant. It is all a risk, to meet someone from afar for fulltime bdsm. Some here have taken that risk several times. Brave if you ask me. Yet, too risky. 





callofzion -> RE: Is BDSM just shallow? (7/30/2007 1:46:10 AM)

Hullo to all, Just to clarify, I don't really think BDSM is shallow... It was a trick! A trick to draw you in and get you all to buy ginsu knives!

On a serious note, it was more the overly simplistic "Do it now or get the hell out" attitude that seemed shallow, not the entirely of BDSM...




MasterMike04103 -> RE: Is BDSM just shallow? (7/30/2007 1:47:53 AM)

COZ,

To speak on the clerification post you made... I would have to assume that if the two people in the relationship were serious at all, that there would be some form of "contract" involved with safety steps in place to prevent a total wash of a relationship from taking place. I am not sure out others out here in CM land feel, but to me, the relationship I have with my girl is deeper than anything I have ever had thus far, and we have only been togeather for a 3 months...

Again, every relationship is different, and each couple has their own ways of doing things, but I would think that from a Tops Point of View... One wouldn't want to waste all that time and training of the bottom for ANY reason... It takes a LONG time to get your bottom to understand your needs and to do everything the way you want it...

Take what you read with a grain of salt and a shot of Jose..

Mike




came4U -> RE: Is BDSM just shallow? (7/30/2007 1:49:05 AM)

k that was interesting.




BoiJen -> RE: Is BDSM just shallow? (7/30/2007 1:49:40 AM)

not every "serious" relationship has a contract beyond hey wanna do this? Some are just better at communicating than others. I wouldn't put that stipulation on these things.




ownedgirlie -> RE: Is BDSM just shallow? (7/30/2007 1:53:01 AM)

Damn, and I could use a new set of knives....[:D]

You're right - it is an overly simplistic statement which (in my case, anyway) really has a lot of thought and understanding and working together behind it.  It's a really quick summary with about 3 gazillion pages of script behind it. 

So I'm glad you asked the question.  And no, I don't live in fear.  I live knowing all I need to do is be true to myself and all will be well.  And if I veer off that path, he's going to smack me right back on it, for the sake of both of us.  The thing is, while I've had my share of screw ups along the way, I never actually refused him, and I can't see that ever happening in the future.

But I'm just one out of mucho around here, and can only speak from my own situation and experiences.




MasterMike04103 -> RE: Is BDSM just shallow? (7/30/2007 1:57:40 AM)

naw I want the new george foreman grill that doubles as a waffle maker, grilled cheese maker and biscut cooker...




SusanofO -> RE: Is BDSM just shallow? (7/30/2007 1:58:14 AM)

MasterMike: Great point about contracts.

I myself haven't had one yet (in writing anyway, although my ex-Dom and I had a pretty solid verbal agreement, and for the most part, (except for once) stuck with it) , but I know many many many people do - and to the OP: Yes, the express purpose of a contract is to lay out in writing (or at least explicitly) exactly what two people (or more I guess if it is a Poly family) expect from eachother in their relationhsip.

They do this in a process called "Negotiation" and there are many forms it can take.

Negotiating a BDSM contract with a Master or Dominant (or Mistress), for anything from a scene that lasts a few days, to something that is hoped for as an enduring relationship, from what I have read, can be an elaborate, or  a relatively simple process, depending on the two people involved.

Since I haven't got a vast knowledge of contracts myself, I hope someone else can maybe elaborate on their development and use. I've heard they can indeed help keep a relationship afloat sometimes, due to the two people knowing what they promised to do for eachother at the beginning, if the relationship begins to falter.

Some people might consider them un-necessary, and other people "swear by them". **In case you are wondering, the submissive has input into any BDSM contract re: What her Dom or Master (or Mistress) can expect from her (or him) .

*During the negotiating process, a submissive has a right to state their "Hard Limits" - things they absolutely will not ever do for a Dom or Master (or Mistress), either because they find them repulsive, or morally repugnant, or they just, for some other reason, cannot bring themsleves to do those kind of things. 

A Master of Mistress "testing" a submissive's "Hard Limits" is a good enough reason (at least to me, and for many people) for a submissive to end the relationship. But a good Master, Mistress or Dom who is truly concerned with their submissive's welfare probably knows better than to try to cross the line and "test" those "Hard Limits" with their submissive. 

- Susan




themischievous1 -> RE: Is BDSM just shallow? (7/30/2007 2:08:23 AM)

I think each relationship we hear about or get a small glimpse into has its own unique way of being, whether it be BDSM bedroom play, a D/s role-play relationship, or a 24/7 power exchange dymanic of some kind, or even just for fun kink types of deals. I think whether or not these various relationships are considered shallow depends upon one's personal preferences and subjective views.

Personally I believe that any individual I became involved with that would consider the relationship over because the dynamic changed, wouldn't be the kind of person I could stay with long term anyway. I would consider this kind of person to be someone who couldn't deal with the necessary growth and change that is part and parcel of a mature, healthy relationship that involves mature, healthy people.

People change. That's what we do. Anyone who doesn't understand, expect, and accept that their partner will change in the future, is a person who is in for a rude awakening. Reality will bring them a clue and it is likely to be rocky sailing when it does if they don't learn to adapt and adjust to the fact that no one remains the same indefinitely. Along with that, people's sexual interests and desires often change as well. Rigid expectations in relationships don't normally work for the long term, from my experience.




MasterMike04103 -> RE: Is BDSM just shallow? (7/30/2007 2:10:43 AM)

Susan,

Please bear with me, as I am going to share some of my beleifs about contracts or herein refered to as the K (which is legal shorthand for contract) and how it works into BDSM... 

Like many things that are common use, K's and other statements of consent, ideals and needs are communicated. If  two parties enter into a union for a specific scene... Even though its called negotiation, the two parties are forming a agreement, and in the case(s) of public play there are usually others around to witness the agreement, this can be construde as a preformance K, that based on one or the others preformance, thus and so will happen.

Personally, I use verbal K's with each and EVERY play partner, making clear the intent of the scene, their needs and ablilitys, and what will if need be stop said scene.

Another part of this is the potential use of Safeword(s) which would nullify the K between the two parties, stopping the scene, or what have you. I would have to assume, which I hate, that in the case of the OP, the defiance(sp?) of the bottom would have lead to the imediate termination of the relationship... Only if it was clearly defined in some form of agreement or terms of a K.

Now to speak to boijen's point... the whole you wanna, ok lets doit... can still be looked at as a K, because one person offers the idea, the other either accepts or counter offers with a slight modification of the origional, which the first person has to accept or decline. Either way, two MAJOR parts of a K are OFFER and ACCEPTANCE, along with TERMS, and a few others.

So no matter how you slice it... There is a form of contactual, although in BDSM non legally inforceable contacts all over the palce.

Thats all for this time,

Mike




Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875