RE: Personels messages (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


CLASSnKINK -> RE: Personels messages (8/8/2007 7:14:46 AM)

I try to take the time to respond personally to the profile im interested in and point out what interests we may share. anyway, thanks for thinking about it




CLASSnKINK -> RE: Personels messages (8/8/2007 7:18:54 AM)

i dont really appreciate your tone, but what you and came4u mention could be something i should consider. maybe advice with a softer tone would be kinder. thanks for the suggestion however




LadyLynx -> RE: Personels messages (8/8/2007 7:23:04 AM)

Ok, tell ya what.  Open a female account, of ethier Dom or sub, post a picture of a beautiful woman, (hell with some of the trolls on this site, she doesn't need to be beautiful!) and wait until the pic is approved answear every email you get including those in your bulk mail, and discuss this a month later.  I get the feeling that you will have a better idea of why some women choose not to answear every single email with even a "not interested" A friend of mine on another site, when she joined she got like 30-50 emails a day!  She got so sick of it, she requested that I go to her account and check out those whose profiles met her standards, and to delete the rest.  I did that almost every day for like a month. Then she closed her account because a past bf came back into her life.  Anyways, I try to answear most, but I admit when I see the dark blue nicname in my mail box, I want to scream with frustration, because it usually some yahoo who hasn't bothered actually reading my email.  (sorry for the rant.)  




CLASSnKINK -> RE: Personels messages (8/8/2007 7:33:13 AM)

let me just say for those that read into my profile what they wish. i stressed in the profile that none of my interests where requirements and that i wasn't looking for a model. . for those that feel i have something against larger women, they would be wrong unless my not being sexually attracted to them is offensive i dont understand the initial rants/flames which started all this. many of my dear friends are not lean, that doesnt mean i dont cherish them. as for being attacked directly i just like most people dont enjoy it or appreciate it. nowhere in my profile did i attempt or imply that i was sizephobic or in anyway downgrade larger women. for those of you that read that iinto my profile i appologize, but that is not and was not my intent. again i believe a certain few read into it what they wanted and then others just piled on. to all of you. feel free to continue the attack, i choose not to persue it with any of you...




CLASSnKINK -> RE: Personels messages (8/8/2007 7:34:35 AM)

wrong




CLASSnKINK -> RE: Personels messages (8/8/2007 7:36:45 AM)

no, this was regarding some personal emails i sent out, not for employment.




CLASSnKINK -> RE: Personels messages (8/8/2007 7:38:45 AM)

thanks for the advice. im considering the photo change.




Mustardseed -> RE: Personels messages (8/8/2007 7:40:30 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: CLASSnKINK

I can appreciate that you have an abundance of mail. I wish you luck in sorting through it all. I do however hope you will at least take time to glance at it and send a short no to those that have at least put forth some effort to write you a brief coherant note.


You may also want to consider how long it may take someone with so much mail to look through and answer all of it that fits their criteria -- especially if they go for the most promising messages and profiles first -- then move on to the messages that reach their bulk mailbox. Also if that person gets another response back from a more promising party, I'd not be surprised if they put bulk and other mail on hold to continue the conversation that most fascinated them.

If the point of this site is to make connections, find people you really click with and hopefully hook up, it doesn't make sense to make mail that doesn't float one's boat a priority in the face of a potential relationship.

As to "hi" messages, "winks" I've gotten on Alt.com and the like, I generally respond with, "Hi. Um, do I know you? If so, from where? If not, was there something in specific you wanted to talk to me about? Something in my profile or on my blog that you wanted to comment on?" and go from there. In most cases, I never hear from these people again.

When I get a message from someone unsuitable, I tend to respond with, "Hi. Thanks for hotlisting me! I'm flattered, though reading your profile I'm confused about why you did so. Was there something in specific you wanted to discuss with me? I hope that you're having a great day!" In most cases, the person realizes that even though I'm a switch, I'm not hunting for another top or dom right now -- the ones who bother to respond usually apologize for not checking my profile more closely.

I've never gotten to the point where I needed to scan through my inbox list of message titles, copy-n-paste a username and look up the profile before even reading the message; but depending on what the rest of my life was like -- if I had limited time where I could access adult sites like CollarMe -- I could certainly see making a decision to put a lot of mail on the backburner or even delete it unread just because there might not be that many hours in day.

The majority of the contacts I have go to Bulk Mail. If I don't think to check it, they sit not only unread, but undiscovered for a fairly long time no matter how often I log on. CollarMe announces when I get new mail that fits my criteria, but it doesn't bother to point out mail that does not -- I have to think to check that folder whether it has anything in it or not. There are people who don't realize that there's any mail there, and there are people who are so busy that I imagine that they think that maybe they'll think to check it the next time.

I have sent out mail that has never gotten opened, and I've sent out mail that has been read but has gone unanswered. That's fairly rare. I don't send out much mail, and when I do I generate each message uniquely for the person I'm addressing. Considering how little mail I send out, I get a fairly high response rate. Even to people who live far away ... hell, if they've got great body art in a picture, I may write to give them props even if they're not a great match for me. If I find someone who seems ideal ... but lives too far away, I may send them an "alas" note. (Okay, actually it's more pouty than Elizabethan, but perhaps you get my drift.) I may have a standard mental template for some responses to mail I've received, but I think that an interesting profile deserves a unique -- not canned -- response. I don't like getting mail that suggests the person didn't have a reason for finding my particular profile interesting. I respond to it, but it's always with my own internal template.

I would say that this is a learning experience. You've only sent out 30 messages thus far, and given the number of users I'm guessing that there must be a couple of hundred other profiles here that fit your criteria. The first 30 were a bust unless some of them still intend to get back to you. Maybe you can keep practicing and see if what goes around comes around.




LadyLynx -> RE: Personels messages (8/8/2007 7:41:50 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: CLASSnKINK

i see you read what you wanted to read. bbw possibly? im sorry you didnt see or read what you needed to, but again this really isnt a post asking for a review of my profile


It was this reply that got you labeled as a sizephobic.  Maybe others on here shouldn't jump to conclusions, but considering you didn't explain your comment..............it happens




Mustardseed -> RE: Personels messages (8/8/2007 7:46:53 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: CLASSnKINK

lol, yep, thats what i thought, lol. you know they have icons with bigger women depicted. just a suggestion...


Like LadyLynx, I'd assumed that you were a sizephobe based on posts like this one. *shrug*





atendersoul -> RE: Personels messages (8/8/2007 7:59:43 AM)

many have not heard nor know of a term within the Lifestyle called "Protocal".....




LaTigresse -> RE: Personels messages (8/8/2007 8:01:56 AM)

And some don't even care about protocol, but one thing is for sure......you will get a fight if you try to DEFINE, protocol!!!




DarkWriter -> RE: Personels messages (8/8/2007 7:45:45 PM)

I make a point of opening and replying to every e-mail I get. Someone has taken the time to write to me, the least I can do is acknowledge that and respond to them. 




vegeta -> RE: Personels messages (8/8/2007 8:27:04 PM)

Have you tried other sites? No woman answers unless you are young and rich.
Try other sites too.





LaTigresse -> RE: Personels messages (8/9/2007 7:57:16 AM)

Yes, I require all emailer's to enclose, in their first email, a photo of them holding their Amex black, close enough to the camera so I can read the acct number of course.




Durus -> RE: Personels messages (8/9/2007 8:04:26 AM)

What is wrong with him mentioning being Christian or Conservative?




LadyPact -> RE: Personels messages (8/9/2007 8:58:25 AM)

Something did occur to Me that may not have been in the previous replies.  Depending on the criteria that anyone has fitted for their home page 'search' when they first log in, your photo and a portion of your profile might be what they are seeing before even opening their mailbox.  This might be how the photo and/or portions of your profile are contributing factors in whether or not the mail is being read.




Mustardseed -> RE: Personels messages (8/10/2007 7:55:45 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Durus

What is wrong with him mentioning being Christian or Conservative?


Nothing, if it matches the criteria of whoever is viewing the profile itself. Indeed, the only issue I took with it when reading his profile is that he seemed to list these as factors more than once, which could have been taken as harping a bit. However, with the way that the OP presented them, other than the repitition, I didn't get any real fire 'n brimstone or attempts to convert out of his profile. I'd be more likely to chalk the emphasis up to writing certain sections seperately and not really proofreading the whole profile.

I wouldn't choose to date a Conservative Christian, because I don't think that we'd have much in common. However, I'd much rather that folks disclose that inforamtion about themselves on their profile rather than keep it hidden like a shameful secret and then spring it on an unsuspecting suitor later on.

Best quote on my 35th birthday from my best friend: "Ya damned hippie!" [:D]




LATEXBABY64 -> RE: Personels messages (8/10/2007 8:23:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Durus

What is wrong with him mentioning being Christian or Conservative?



um yeah what is wrong with him i think that is great means he has morals and a foundation.. it means he is stable




Satyr6406 -> RE: Personels messages (8/16/2007 10:06:19 PM)

I haven't read through all of the responses but, I skimmed through a good portion.
 
Has it occurred to anyone that this whole thread boils down to a "Why isn't anyone digging my groove?" bitchfest?
 
 
 
 
 
Peace and comfort,
 
 
 
 
 
Michael




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625