WinsomeDefiance
Posts: 6719
Joined: 8/7/2007 Status: offline
|
The dichotomy of respecting the rights of those involved in safe, sane and consensual relationships while protecting and aiding the victims of non-consensual abuse still remains a blurred, sometimes even unfathomable concept for most vanilla lawmakers and law enforcers. To my knowledge you can't legally consent to be abused because such behavior is considered pathological and a form of paraphilia. In other words, you can't consent if you aren't sane and you can't be sane if you consent to be harmed, is how the law interprets it. Until THAT perception is addressed and rewritten in the psychiatrist's bible, the law will always be able to cause problems for BDSM'ers. Admittedly, I'm behind the times, such perceptions may have changed. Kudos if they have. I can't really connect the dots with the original poster's reference to the basic reality for those participating in BDSM, myself. Any laws that protect victims of domestic violence and provide them with aid and resources is a positive direction for our society as a whole. I wish the law had been stricter when I was struggling to survive an abusive relationship that was all but vindicated by the law simply because we were married. The sad truth was the dog my husband killed had more rights than I did as his wife because it ISN'T ok to harm animals, but in Loiusiana (10 years ago), it was ok to kick your wife and set her straight.
|