RE: Altered states. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


SirDominic -> RE: Altered states. (8/15/2007 10:00:03 AM)

As you mentioned, I do, from time to time, resort to sarcasm. But I have rarely, if ever, attacked any single individual in the way Michael did to me. My comments tend to be general in nature, mocking a concept, rather than people.

No doubt, my second post on this thread was made in a sarcastic tone. But I wasn't attacking any individual, merely making a general comment that so many people knew their limits. That some took that as an attack on everyone is a reflection of their personality, not mine.

Michael came back with a scathing personal attack on me. I'm cool with that, but my question to you is, why is his post "delightfully entertaining", while mine was in some way inappropriate? I look forward, as always, to your thoughts.





atendersoul -> RE: Altered states. (8/15/2007 10:38:31 AM)

No......would not, will not scene with anyone that is on drugs or drinking nor would girl here do either....scening or not...
who would want to alter the sensations?




sugarcoatedscamp -> RE: Altered states. (8/15/2007 11:18:37 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LATEXBABY64

while in both you have a chocie how about take away the chute  cause here is how that works one drink leads two or three or four. we are people who always push the limits and sometimes not in good ways.. if you can say no to one you are ahead of many. because everything starts with just one.. the only thing this thread proves is that some people like living on the edge and some do not.. it is that resposiblity factor of what you do while on the edige that makes that difference as long it harms you and no one else who cares.. cause and effect yep learn it know it live it


Of course, and potsmoking will make me a crackhead one day, I just know it...




Aswad -> RE: Altered states. (8/15/2007 12:19:53 PM)

Sarcasm is fine with me, Dominic.

As for what comments were directed at what, and whether this constitutes an attack on any person, I suggest we take that over PM. My thoughts on the matter are, I think, not likely to be offensive, but they are likely not to be of general interest and this thread has drifted far enough.

As for your second post, admitting to being sarcastic in commenting that people knew their limits constitutes admitting to saying they are incapable of judging this for themself, without specifying which ones are and which ones aren't. I think you can see where that causes antagonism, again without dwelling too much on it here on this side of the board.

As for the bit about delightfully entertaining, that is subjective, of course. I found that he expressed sentiments that I shared in the mental context I had while reading it. Simply put, I was neither sympathetic of your opinion as I perceived it from your posts, nor the way you expressed it. Whether I was in error or not is hard to tell without telepathy or further discourse.

Again, I am open to the idea that you are different from how I perceive you, and the same goes for your opinion and your way of expressing myself. I come across rather differently than I intend a lot of the time. Should you want to correct my impression on the other side of the board, that would be welcome. But you might want to reflect on whether there are elements of how you expressed yourself that warrant examination, given that more than one person took things in a way you seem to find at odds with how you wished to present things.

Just my 2 cents.




Aswad -> RE: Altered states. (8/15/2007 12:23:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: atendersoul

who would want to alter the sensations?


When using your tool of choice, do you always target the same spot with the same timing and the same force? If not, why not? Could it be that you want a bit of variation? That is what altering the sensations is about. Altering them a lot is just a difference of magnitude.




Page: <<   < prev  7 8 9 10 [11]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875