SmokingGun82
Posts: 575
Joined: 6/19/2004 Status: offline
|
I think I catch the spirit of your question, and I'll try to answer with that in mind. I've had a few relationships that were so vanilla they didn't even have hot fudge on them... including one where she thought sex with the lights on qualified as "kinky" (in her words). Sometimes they were fun, sometimes they were even semi-fulfilling... but it always felt a little empty. And, in the end, they came crashing down for a thousand different reasons, not just a vanilla/not discrepency. But the defining moment came with my most recent ex... I'd remained friends with a girl who identifies as a slave, someone I'd had a brief relationship with. Upon finding this out, my ex said some rather harsh things, including comments about anyone who wanted to submit being stupid, and anyone who would want to be with a submissive being manipulative, controlling, and misogynistic. Apparently, to her, there's no such thing as male subs. And yes, she knew that I'd been in a relationship with the friend before, and that I'm a sadist. It wasn't the last fight we'd have. It wasn't the last time one of us would say something horribly insulting and downright cruel to the other one... but it was the moment I decided I'd never be with anyone who wasn't at least kink-friendly again. Maybe vanilla that realizes other flavors are good for other people, but not someone who's only interested in one flavor. I'll quote Thank You For Smoking, since I watched it last night... even if he uses chocalate instead of vanilla as an example: "Well, I need more than chocolate. And for that matter, I need more than vanilla. I believe that we need freedom and choice when it comes to our ice cream, and that, Joey Naylor,that is the definition of liberty."
_____________________________
It frightens me, the awful truth of how sweet life can be. - Bob Dylan Proper capitalization is the difference between "I had to help my Uncle Jack off a horse" and "I had to help my uncle jack off a horse."
|