slaveboyforyou
Posts: 3607
Joined: 1/6/2005 From: Arkansas, U.S.A. Status: offline
|
quote:
Couple questions: What is you assesment of the the poor people's attitudes under chaves? So you are saying then that the Monroe Doctrine effectively gave us the power to colonize? So you feel the film should have been strictly an interview or you didnt like the ratio between the two maybe? Why and under what circumstances do you feel america should do the same? You really knew all that already? I think this is more than a couple of questions, but I'll take a stab at it. The poor people in the film love him. Do you really think this film was without bias? I doubt very seriously they would have included any footage of the poor that don't like him. I can't make a honest assessment of Venezuela or any other country by watching a 90 minute film, and neither can you. This film doesn't say anything about Chavez's actual censorship of media outlets. It also seems to imply that rich Venezuelans have no right to complain about their government when they have it so good. I did not say that the Monroe Doctrine gave us the power to colonize other countries. It was a warning to other countries to stay out of the Western Hemisphere, because that was under the United States sphere of influence. Using influence to manipulate other countries into doing what is in our own interests is not colonization. I don't particularly like the fact that we do it, but if we didn't someone else would. This film deals a lot with our history during the Cold War. During that time, the Soviets and Cuba were heavily involved in the internal politics of countries all over Latin America. We did the same. I am not saying that is right or wrong. I am simply saying that it is a common practice. The film was what it was. It was not objective journalism, and I'd say the same thing if it was a right wing biased film. They don't criticize Chavez at all, and they only talked to a few people who are opposed to him. I don't follow Venezuelan affairs closely, but I have heard many Venezuelan expatriates criticize this man. They are not all wealthy, but that shouldn't matter. A person's economic status does not exclude them from having a right to their own opinion. I would personally prefer it if the United States stayed out of the internal politics of other countries. We can be much more effective at manipulating economics without doing that. We only give people like Chavez and Castro validity when we do things like that. Regardless of what I think about our foreign policy, I still don't think people like Chavez are good for their people. People like him will hang themselves soon enough without our interference. Knew what already? I knew that we manipulated other governments, and I knew that we directly helped in coups and civil wars. I know that Pinochet has supporters and detractors in Chile and in our own country. I am not Chilean, and I have never been to Chile. I have never been to any country south of Mexico. I am not an expert by any means on Latin American politics. I do know that this film did not give a complete, two sided picture of what goes on there.
|