quote:

ORIGINAL: cuffnspankme
Ready, these are my thoughts as well. Why try to get out of something when you are in it, wearing it, what have you, to please your Dom/me. I have never understood those that try to escape or get out of something.

quote:

ORIGINAL: hardbodysub

Fine, and why you're at it, you might as well forget the Humbler altogether and just say "Get on your knees, bend over, and stay there". In fact, why don't we just get rid of all bondage devices, paddles, whips, and all that paraphenalia? A Dom/me can just order the sub to stay still, and hit or bite themselves until they hurt.

quote:

ORIGINAL: instynctive

Try this view out for size: http://i142.photobucket.com/albums/r99/instynctive/toys/cropped-side.jpg

There is really no radius to speak of at the ends of the scrotal hole.. in fact, I just measured the 3" wide hole on both pieces and "eyeballed" the arc, using My bend sander (which is why the ends don't meet up perfectly).

From everything I've gathered researching these things online, the whole point is simply to restrict movement by placing copious amounts of uncomfortable pulling pressure on the scrotum (as a weighted parachute would) as opposed to clamping down on the scrotal skin itself... although I am designing one that does thanks to My muse, bear.. heh heh heh

If the above picture still doesn't help out, I'll make a CAD block for you and send it this evening.

quote:

ORIGINAL: pixelslave

quote:

ORIGINAL: hardbodysub

Fine, and why you're at it, you might as well forget the Humbler altogether and just say "Get on your knees, bend over, and stay there". In fact, why don't we just get rid of all bondage devices, paddles, whips, and all that paraphenalia? A Dom/me can just order the sub to stay still, and hit or bite themselves until they hurt.

Ever heard of "mental bondage"?  It's extremely difficult in my experience to try and submit to! [&:]
 
That said, I wouldn't be making Mistress a humbler to use on me, if I were also making plans to try and escape from it!  She's really good when it comes to smacking, squeezing and finding new ways of generally tormenting and having a great deal of fun with my fully exposed balls. [sm=lol.gif] 
 
Perish the thought of escape, I'd be missing waay too much fun! [;)]
 
 - pixel
 
   Collared to Majik

quote:

ORIGINAL: BossyShoeBitch

quote:

ORIGINAL: hardbodysub

quote:

ORIGINAL: instynctive

That's an easy enough fix for a Dom/me...

"Don't touch the humbler."

Done.

Fine, and why you're at it, you might as well forget the Humbler altogether and just say "Get on your knees, bend over, and stay there". In fact, why don't we just get rid of all bondage devices, paddles, whips, and all that paraphenalia? A Dom/me can just order the sub to stay still, and hit or bite themselves until they hurt.

Geez.  Take all the fun out of it why don'tcha?

quote:

ORIGINAL: hardbodysub

Ever hear of mental bondage? Uh ... yeah, like just about every day on these boards. To me - booooorrrrrring! A lot of people love it, and good for them. But isn't it obvious that when someone starts a topic to find ways to improve the security of a bondage device, they are interested in physical bondage, and that pushing things like mental bondage at them is really off topic?

I don't understand why people just can't accept the fact that many of us are extremely excited by real, inescapable physical bondage and other inescapable devices, and that we don't need to be "converted". It's not that we don't understand submission without physical force or bondage, it's that we don't find it exciting or interesting.

I don't think I've ever seen a topic about mental bondage, or willing submission, with replies that question the reason that anyone would want such a thing. Such criticism of preferences doesn't make any sense to me. However, virtually every time someone posts about physical bondage, or how to make a device less escapable, someone jumps in and starts questioning WHY anyone would want to do that. Please. Give it a rest. We don't need to be converted to your preferences.

quote:

ORIGINAL: pixelslave

quote:

ORIGINAL: hardbodysub

Ever hear of mental bondage? Uh ... yeah, like just about every day on these boards. To me - booooorrrrrring! A lot of people love it, and good for them. But isn't it obvious that when someone starts a topic to find ways to improve the security of a bondage device, they are interested in physical bondage, and that pushing things like mental bondage at them is really off topic?

I don't understand why people just can't accept the fact that many of us are extremely excited by real, inescapable physical bondage and other inescapable devices, and that we don't need to be "converted". It's not that we don't understand submission without physical force or bondage, it's that we don't find it exciting or interesting.

I don't think I've ever seen a topic about mental bondage, or willing submission, with replies that question the reason that anyone would want such a thing. Such criticism of preferences doesn't make any sense to me. However, virtually every time someone posts about physical bondage, or how to make a device less escapable, someone jumps in and starts questioning WHY anyone would want to do that. Please. Give it a rest. We don't need to be converted to your preferences.

To each their own dude!  If you want to start your own thread about improving something, feel free to do so!  This thread was started simply to get some existing design details I needed for the dimensions of the opening in a standard humbler one would purchase on-line.  What you've done with your rant is what most people around here consider a hijaak.  Enough said? [&:]
 
 - pixel
 
   Collared to Majik