RE: Dominance & Man (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity



Message


litleone8620 -> RE: Dominance & Man (8/25/2007 6:18:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance

Honestly, it isn't the ridiculous statement that has my hackles rising so much as the grammar.

I wonder if it was intentional that Man is repeatedly singular...and women plural in his post? Are all "women" supposed to submit eagerly, angelically and docilely to this one "Man?"



Perhaps he means 'Man' in general?  As is all 'Man' Which, in and of itself is grammatically incorrect.

What I'm curious about is, why, in his profile it says he wants someone who is 'preferably one that is not entirely civillized and wild at heart' but yet he expects all women to be docile, and angelic?




instynctive -> RE: Dominance & Man (8/25/2007 6:20:56 PM)

Because he's a troll.




litleone8620 -> RE: Dominance & Man (8/25/2007 6:26:00 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: instynctive

Because he's a troll.


Is that what that smell is?

*Wanders off to be angelic and docile*




WinsomeDefiance -> RE: Dominance & Man (8/25/2007 6:26:56 PM)

To be fair, he's an illiterate troll looking for a woman who can cook better than she can suck @o@k, who is docile and angelic while also being an untamed wild cat who can still appreciate he's a male PUSS.

I sure hope sanity is still holding the line.......




instynctive -> RE: Dominance & Man (8/26/2007 5:05:23 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance

To be fair, he's an illiterate troll looking for a woman who can cook better than she can suck @o@k, who is docile and angelic while also being an untamed wild cat who can still appreciate he's a male PUSS.

I sure hope sanity is still holding the line.......



I still really like boots...

;-)




slaveish -> RE: Dominance & Man (8/26/2007 2:48:42 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: AquaticSub

Ooo... What odds are people giving that he starts a post complaining about how the female subs/slaves here aren't really submissives but are evil bitches?




Well snot. You mean we're not?

Heck fire, I've been operating under the wrong manual all this time. How embarrassing.




beargonewild -> RE: Dominance & Man (8/26/2007 3:16:40 PM)

That's ok slaveish......we subs forgive you.  HUGS




Carrianna -> RE: Dominance & Man (8/26/2007 4:07:30 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mcpuss

Man are males and they should be dominant by nature…but a woman trying to dominate a man…that’s just not wright.

Women should be docile and angelic & eager to please man.


Next you will be saying there is only one god, and that it has to be male???




sambamanslilgirl -> RE: Dominance & Man (8/26/2007 5:18:24 PM)

mother is another name for God on the lips and hearts of UMs

God is a woman




beargonewild -> RE: Dominance & Man (8/26/2007 7:03:02 PM)

Uhm I beg to differ sambasis....

The God is male
The Goddess is female




WinsomeDefiance -> RE: Dominance & Man (8/26/2007 7:28:47 PM)

quote:


Original:  Instynctive
I still really like boots...

;-)


Ditto.  Boots still = Drool!  Yumm .




Lashra -> RE: Dominance & Man (8/26/2007 8:31:24 PM)

If only this was fantasy land and not reality. Because in reality humans of both sexes can be dominant or submissive. So if you prefer your females to ALL be submissive and docile then you need to buy yourself a blowup doll and then you will have the woman of your dreams.

~Lashra




cuffnspankme -> RE: Dominance & Man (8/26/2007 8:53:25 PM)

*fluffs her pretty white dress and adjusts the halo, being her twue sub self and angelic and docile*
Well I know that it is my greatest desire to be angelic and docile for all "man" and be a twue sub, serving all and every want and need for every man out there.




beargonewild -> RE: Dominance & Man (8/26/2007 9:06:19 PM)

*tries to strut around with chest puffed out and acting totally dominant* 
Oh hell, heck with this, just not meant to be dominant!




cuffnspankme -> RE: Dominance & Man (8/27/2007 8:22:44 AM)

*giggles cuz Bear trying to be Dom is working about as well as her trying to be angelic and docile*




LadySeraphina -> RE: Dominance & Man (8/27/2007 9:10:09 AM)

*debates making a really bad fake profile, and starting insane riot-inducing threads for entertainment*




sambamanslilgirl -> RE: Dominance & Man (8/27/2007 10:36:44 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: beargonewild

*tries to strut around with chest puffed out and acting totally dominant* 
Oh hell, heck with this, just not meant to be dominant!

once again my young padawan you have failed at twue domliness




beargonewild -> RE: Dominance & Man (8/27/2007 11:46:51 AM)

only because I ran over to the dark side.




beargonewild -> RE: Dominance & Man (8/27/2007 11:51:04 AM)

and your teaching methods left much to be desired    *razz*




sambamanslilgirl -> RE: Dominance & Man (8/27/2007 11:53:05 AM)

that is why you failed   *bitchslap*




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125