Satyr6406
Posts: 820
Joined: 3/27/2006 From: New Brunswick, N.J. Status: offline
|
I've posted on this subject, a few times before and I'd like to share it, again, now. [Disclaimer: What follows is NOT about "dictionary definitions". They are my own thoughts and beliefs.] I have always felt a little differently about "jealousy". I think that a little bit of jealousy is a part of a healthy relationship. Let me explain ... I understand/believe jealousy to be "fear of losing position or importance" (Despite the disclaimer above, that is pretty close to one of the dictionary definitions). While I don't like the word "fear", there, I guess it's appropos. My "fear" of losing my position or importance in my partner's life keeps me "on the straight and narrow". It makes me want to pay attention to their wants and needs. It keeps me "buying her little trinkets" just because "I thought of you, today". Without this "fear", I know for a fact that I could become very swamped in my own selfish desires. While I believe that's my right, as a dominant, I also believe that if I allow myself to become so immersed, I run the risk of damaging the relationship. Now, in this situation, I think what works best for me is that what we're talking about is POSSESSIVENESS. Possessiveness, in my mind (please refer to the disclaimer), is NOT a part of a healthy relationhip. While some may think it's okay for a dominant to even be possessive, I don't. I find it to be rooted, firmly in insecurity; which is NOT a dominant trait. Now, I took the original post to be leaning more toward the sexual in nature as opposed to an actual polyamorous situation. I will procede under that assumption. If your dominant is a person like me who - for whatever reason - has no interest, ability, or desire to be completely, physically "monogamous" then it is NOT about you. It's about him! There are people who don't believe that "monogamy" is natural, even in humans (There's a fairly recent thread on that very subject, floating around here, somewhere). He may be one of those people that just can't/won't be "monogamous". It is how he is wired. It is something that is deep-rooted within him. NO ONE is going to change him. That's not to say that he may not change, of his own volition, one day but that change won't come from outside. What is interesting is that many of these same dominants don't feel that their submissives are entitled to that same touch of humanity. Anyway, I digress. Now, try to see this situation this way: Your dominant enjoys these things that this other lady does for him. The fact that you may not be able to perform these acts and illicite the exact same response isn't a failure of desire (to please him), on your part. A failure of desire is a non-desirable quality in a submissive. You WANT to please him. Since your desire is there, it is a failure of ability. No GOOD dominant will hold a failure of ability against you. If you try to think of this situation, in this way, you might find that your fears will be assuaged. I wish you the best of luck, in this situation. Peace and comfort, Michael [EDITED BECAUSE MY "S" KEY DOESN"T ALWAYS SUBMIT TO ME]
< Message edited by Satyr6406 -- 8/28/2007 3:18:20 AM >
_____________________________
Peace and comfort, Michael Former Vice-President Gore didn't invent the internet but, he DID make up global warming!
|