RE: Cuck, Partnering and Safer Sex Practices (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Submissive



Message


e01n -> RE: Cuck, Partnering and Safer Sex Practices (9/7/2007 4:26:58 PM)

An idea: cuck sucks the latex... preferably cold and bit dried up, where it starts getting rather ripe and stinky...

Oral ingestion tends to be a bit lower risk than direct genital contact... and it doesn't preclude oral pleasuring either as adjunct to the fantasy...




Grlwithboy -> RE: Cuck, Partnering and Safer Sex Practices (9/7/2007 5:24:32 PM)

It's a thought. I've also thought it would just be painfully hot to dump a rubber into the cuck.When with someone who's subsequently going to be licking me and fluid bonded and unprotected with me, though, I'm just not there.

I'm pretty stringent about the vectors issue, I'm on meds that dampen my immune system, so better safe than sorry.





e01n -> RE: Cuck, Partnering and Safer Sex Practices (9/7/2007 5:39:36 PM)

in that case, definitely.




iammachine -> RE: Cuck, Partnering and Safer Sex Practices (9/7/2007 8:51:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Grlwithboy
but I have no interest in doing it with guys who are more hung up about licking spooge out of me than they are about me fucking whom I want and being safe doing it.


I agree with this statement 100%, and is very much along the lines of what I've been thinking. Thanks for your input!






iammachine -> RE: Cuck, Partnering and Safer Sex Practices (9/7/2007 8:53:08 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: e01n

An idea: cuck sucks the latex... preferably cold and bit dried up, where it starts getting rather ripe and stinky...

Oral ingestion tends to be a bit lower risk than direct genital contact... and it doesn't preclude oral pleasuring either as adjunct to the fantasy...


That definitely sounds much more practical.

You're still my hero, e01n. [;)]




e01n -> RE: Cuck, Partnering and Safer Sex Practices (9/8/2007 9:44:24 AM)

And you're still She Whose Name I Cannot Say And Keep A Straight Face... [;)] (sorry, in-joke)

Had another thought: cuck tied and bound off to the side, and the fucking ends with boy-on-boy bukkake. Condom use is not precluded, it just requires a bit of good timing...

Still not into it. But it's fun trying to think in terms of other people's kinks instead my own tired-ass ones...




iammachine -> RE: Cuck, Partnering and Safer Sex Practices (9/8/2007 10:10:11 AM)

Don't make me fire you!




Cuckme4Life -> RE: Cuck, Partnering and Safer Sex Practices (9/9/2007 4:38:29 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

You know, I've been hearing this a lot lately.

Put the cuck in a chastity device, tie him up and shove a plug up his ass whenever he gets unruly, and he'll do a lot less topping from the bottom.

Afterwards, if he's been a good boy, he can lick her panties, or her used pussy, or whatever else makes his dick ache inside that cage.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Cuckme4Life

Cuckolding does seem to fit into a role of topping from the bottom



LOL!!  Now thats what I am talking about. I like how you think. See People? There is a way to settle the situation!!




Stephann -> RE: Cuck, Partnering and Safer Sex Practices (9/9/2007 8:16:23 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wildfleurs

Before we go any farther I do think its important for me to add that I absolutely think that people should be able to make informed decisions based on what works best for them.    My involvement in this thread is just because I do find it disconcerting to have the belief that statistics substantiate that its safer to drive a car than have unprotected sex.  I have a background in statistics so it’s not to hard for me to know where to get the numbers.  And I was curious about this issue of injuries versus fatalities and so I took a look at the number of non-fatal injurous STDs contracted with the number of non-fatal injurous car accidents.  Apparently your chances of contracting a non-fatal STD is pretty damn high as compared to your chances of getting injured in a car accident even if you include non-motorists.     So, taking your chances with a car is still the safer bet whether we are talking death or injury.

Total number of motorists and non-motorists injured in car accidents in America in 2005: 2,699,000 *

Total number of STD's diagnosed in America 2005 (Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, Syphillis, Genital Herpes, Genital Warts, Pelvic Inflammatory Disease, and Human Papilomavirus): 8,323,762 **

The actual breakdown per STD is:

  • 976,445 – chlamydia diagnoses
  • 339,593 - Gonorrhea
  • 8,724 – syphilis
  • Genital Herpes – 266,000 
  • Genital Warts - 357,000
  • Pelvic Inflammatory Disease - 176,000 
  • Human Papillomavirus (hpv) – 6.2 million

*
NHTSA Traffic Safety Facts: July 2007
** http://www.cdc.gov/nchstp/dstd/Stats_Trends/Stats_and_Trends.htm



As I said, this could get pedantic.

First off, most genital HPV have no symptoms.  Not so with serious car injuries.  Yanking the 6.2 million HPV cases, and you have a substantially different number.

The point of my post isn't to suggest that unprotected sex is somehow 'safe' and that cars are not.  It's to state that there is risk inherent in every activity we engage in; being aware of those risks, and making informed choices is what I consider to be the most important thing.  I fully intend to go skydiving one day, knowing it might kill me.  I also plan to drink 2-3 glasses of beer each night until I die, knowing that it will statistically shave a few years off the end of my life, and drastically (5-6 times?) increase my chances of certain types of cancer. 

Most of us don't really consider the risks that we take daily, as our daily lives require we take risks.  We're more likely to be hit by a car crossing the street than walking on a sidewalk; yet we still cross streets.  We're more likely to be robbed when we are not home during the holidays, yet we still take vacations.  It's new risk that causes us to be afraid most; people who kept their children home from school in Virginia, during the weeks the sniper was knocking off random people, for example. 

In short, I think hysteria over the fear of risk carries it's own risks as well.  In refusing to cross the street one moment, out of fear, you could very well be putting yourself more in danger; since the car that might have run you over was hung up at the last red light 2 minutes ago. 

In short, do what you will, so long as you know what you're risking when you do it.

Stephan




Wildfleurs -> RE: Cuck, Partnering and Safer Sex Practices (9/9/2007 11:01:26 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wildfleurs

Before we go any farther I do think its important for me to add that I absolutely think that people should be able to make informed decisions based on what works best for them.    My involvement in this thread is just because I do find it disconcerting to have the belief that statistics substantiate that its safer to drive a car than have unprotected sex.  I have a background in statistics so it’s not to hard for me to know where to get the numbers.  And I was curious about this issue of injuries versus fatalities and so I took a look at the number of non-fatal injurous STDs contracted with the number of non-fatal injurous car accidents.  Apparently your chances of contracting a non-fatal STD is pretty damn high as compared to your chances of getting injured in a car accident even if you include non-motorists.     So, taking your chances with a car is still the safer bet whether we are talking death or injury.

Total number of motorists and non-motorists injured in car accidents in America in 2005: 2,699,000 *

Total number of STD's diagnosed in America 2005 (Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, Syphillis, Genital Herpes, Genital Warts, Pelvic Inflammatory Disease, and Human Papilomavirus): 8,323,762 **

The actual breakdown per STD is:

  • 976,445 – chlamydia diagnoses
  • 339,593 - Gonorrhea
  • 8,724 – syphilis
  • Genital Herpes – 266,000 
  • Genital Warts - 357,000
  • Pelvic Inflammatory Disease - 176,000 
  • Human Papillomavirus (hpv) – 6.2 million

*
NHTSA Traffic Safety Facts: July 2007
** http://www.cdc.gov/nchstp/dstd/Stats_Trends/Stats_and_Trends.htm



quote:

ORIGINAL: Stephann

As I said, this could get pedantic.

First off, most genital HPV have no symptoms.  Not so with serious car injuries.  Yanking the 6.2 million HPV cases, and you have a substantially different number.



Not having symptoms of a disease do not mean that the disease won't cause damage.  I think it bears reminding you that HIV frequently doesn't have symptoms either. 

There was a purpose behind my grabbing statistics, which was because of your assertion that you seem to be backpedaling from.  The quote that I literally disagreed with was:



quote:

ORIGINAL: Stephann
In short, statistically, it's more dangerous to drive to the hotel to have sex with a stranger, than actually having unprotected sex with a stranger.


Literally and statistically it is more dangerous to have unprotected sex period (stranger, no stranger, your Aunt Sally) than it is to drive.  Whether its a function of death or of non-fatal diseases its just more dangerous.  People can choose to do whatever they want, I just have issues with factually incorrect assertions made to justify behavior.

C~

Edited for grammatical errors.




Stephann -> RE: Cuck, Partnering and Safer Sex Practices (9/9/2007 2:22:51 PM)

Hi C,

If you reread the quote you took issue with, you'll see I used the word danger.  Without turning this thread into an HPV discussion, I'll only say that I don't consider HPV to be overtly dangerous.  You believe it to be, or else you wouldn't have included it in your statistics.  Roughly more than one out of every four women currently has HPV, according to the Journal of American Medical Association.  Only one percent of people who contract or have contracted HPV is expected to later go on to have cervical cancer, unlike the statistics for HIV which almost always results in AIDS.

Non-fatal diseases can mean everything from a wasting, crippling condition, to a bump on your finger, to no symptoms ever.  If you'd like to stand by your HPV statistic (to the tune of more than double the rest of STDs combined) I suggest you qualify the impact HPV actually represents.

The meat of the matter remains, that every action we take (or do not take) carries inherent risk. 

Stephan




e01n -> RE: Cuck, Partnering and Safer Sex Practices (9/9/2007 4:53:43 PM)

Please, put the defibrilators away... The horse is dead. It's a RACK activity we're speaking of and not a "safe" one.

I like you guys - please stop trying to change that opinion.




Griswold -> RE: Cuck, Partnering and Safer Sex Practices (11/3/2007 6:40:31 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Grlwithboy

My Bull and I are not fluid bonded and use condoms. My husband and I are, but if I'm suspect about my Bull's cum in me, I'm as suspect about it in him. Yeah, the whole fantasy is stellar, but I have no interest in doing it with guys who are more hung up about licking spooge out of me than they are about me fucking whom I want and being safe doing it.




I think it's entirely possible I may be in love with you.

(If your husband ever gets hit by a bus....or a small display of mortar in an unusual place....my number's listed). 




onthenosetone -> RE: Cuck, Partnering and Safer Sex Practices (11/4/2007 1:44:41 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Grlwithboy

My Bull and I are not fluid bonded and use condoms. My husband and I are, but if I'm suspect about my Bull's cum in me, I'm as suspect about it in him. Yeah, the whole fantasy is stellar, but I have no interest in doing it with guys who are more hung up about licking spooge out of me than they are about me fucking whom I want and being safe doing it.




Thats how it is for us too[:)]




MidnightMaiden -> RE: Cuck, Partnering and Safer Sex Practices (11/5/2007 2:50:29 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Stephann

What the cuck in an 'arranged' situation like this doesn't get, is that none of this is usually particularly romantic to the woman in question.  Why would a woman keep a man, who doesn't satisfy her in the first place?



Oh I dunno, because you married him and had a child with a disability and no amount of steady steamy sex is worth destroying a stable family environment for that child?  Just a thought? One of what I am sure is many possibilities :)




pixelslave -> RE: Cuck, Partnering and Safer Sex Practices (11/5/2007 8:48:33 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: iammachine
A couple of the things that he described, and are what kind of sparked some questions for me, is a desire to want to "clean" a woman after she had had sex with a bull (I hope I have my terms correct!). Specifically, he mentioned wanting to clean the cum from her.


Personally, I would never enter into a cuckold relationship.  It's not my thing, but to each their own.  To me this kind of activity would only be relatively safe if all involved were fluid bonded.  Some of those I've known of who are involved in cuckolding utilize a "regular" Bull (or several) in their relationship for this kind of activity.  The Bull may be part of a poly relationship, or may be in more or less what you'd call another "committed" relationship with someone else where he doesn't play with others except the cuck's Mistress to help fill a need in that couple's dynamic.  Thus, they are friends of some kind, where the cuck is often humiliated in other ways as well. [&:]
 
Exactly why a man would want to subject himself to this is something I don't entirely understand and probably never will, but that wasn't your question.  I just accept that it's their kink and leave it at that. [;)]
 
 - pixel
 
   Collared to Majik




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
3.320313E-02