amelliagrace
Posts: 1792
Joined: 8/4/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Stephann Did I miss the job fair? And why is it (submissive female) newbies need to be protected from the inexperienced (dominant males who clearly are competing for said submissive females) all the time? Stephan That is an excellent question. I've wondered the same thing myself. Truth be told, I do see the point that a slave/submissive/bottom runs a greater risk of harm at the hands of a Dominant who has misrepresented themself than vice versa, simply due to the nature of power exchange and scening. It is important, I think, to differentiate between someone who is clearly a newbie Dominant and someone who has blatantly misrepresented their skill level. Two things often overlooked are that; (1) The Dominant/Master/Top is not immune to injury at the hands of a submissive who has either misrepresented themselves or is a complete idiot - though the risks are fo rthe most part different that the risks run bythe submissive and (2) A slave/submissive/bottom is not a hunk of meat on a shelf with no brain, no freedom of choice, and no responsibility. JMNSHO, but any submissive who doesn't take reasonable care in selecting a partner(s), and then wants to complain after the fact about mistreatment on some level, truly has no more right to do so than anyone else on the planet who's had a negative relationship or scene experience. If the subbie did in fact look carefully, procede with caution and thought, and still gets burned (sometimes literally) by a lying cretin in Dom's clothing, or one with a "padded" resume, then the submissive has every right to complain about it. IF there were those in the community who knew the Dominant had padded his resume, or was a lying cretin in Dominants clothing, and didn't comment on it to a newbie submissive, then, again JMO, they share responsibility for injury, and for not making an attempt to protect the submissive. I'm not talking about happenstance, accident, or whim of fate, but harm resulting from "society" not attempting to protect itself and its citizenry from clear threats and known lose cannons - not about micromanaging someone elses lifestyle choices and practices. So, BTW, does the greater BDSM community at large. Yes, all of this still, again JMNSHO, apply if your take everything about and switch out the terms Dominant/Master/Top and slave/submissive/bottom. A comment on a slightly related subject: As a submissive,I believe that one of my greatest contributions to the BDSM community, the "lifestyle" and humanity in general is to contribute to the developement of the less experienced. That contribution may take many forms, from casual freindshp and the exchange of ideas, to offering an ass for practice, to freely discussing the internal dynamics of my own submission. "Newbie" and "Beginner" are not negatives in and of themselves, whether the person be Dom or sub. All of a sudden I have the feeling i'm being about as clear as mud. -grace PS Reminds me of something else I'd like to see on a t-shirt: Subbie/Dom by birth Newbie for a season Kinky by the grace of God
|