undergroundsea
Posts: 2400
Joined: 6/27/2004 From: Austin, TX Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: PleaseTieMeDown Am i being selfish wanting more play and serious BDSM time? I don't think you are necessarily being selfish. To want more play and serious BDSM time in itself is not selfish. I no longer date vanilla because BDSM is central to my relationship expression. If I am not able to express my D/s role, I would feel unsatisfied. Different people have different needs and recognizing that your needs are not fulfilled in itself is not selfish. If one person in a relationship is unsatisfied, I don't think it serves the relationship to keep the information to self. That you are asking if you are being selfish suggests that you would rather not be selfish. In my opinion, what determines whether or not you are being selfish is how well you are balancing her needs as you state or ponder yours. And what matters is how the conversation is had--are the feelings conveyed more as a demand or complaint, or as a concern or request and asking how she feels about it (I feel like you are not giving me enough BDSM time versus, I would love it if we could engage more in BDSM and I would like to see how you feel about it). A comment as one is exiting usually does not make for a constructive conversation ;-) Perhaps such a conversation will reveal that she is concerned about being used and wants to see you are interested in her outside of BDSM play, or that she wants enough of a relationship first. Incidentally, I see parallels between a BDSM relationship and a conventional relationship. Without suggesting this scenario is occuring in your case, I do not connect with a position that there will be no BDSM until a relationship is had. Just like in conventional relationship there are smaller activities or expressions of relationship, there are the same in BDSM relationships. BDSM sometimes modifies general social expectations. With general social expectations, if one travels to another city to visit a relationship partner, it is fair to expect that the relationship partner will spend time with the guest. Your post seems to suggest that she is spending most of the time tending to her puppy and ignoring you. However, I expect this description is likely affected by your perception that you are not getting enough time. I expect you are spending more time together than what your post describes. If you take BDSM out of the picture, do you still feel she is not giving you enough time? That is, do you perceive vanilla time together as non-quality time? If so, your dissatisfaction is not as fair. If not, how you feel is more reasonable. Here are a few ideas to consider: The host is always in the flow of everyday life by virtue of being in the everday life scenario. While at the moment the pressures of time and other obligations are more immediate for the host, the visitor is also expending effort by leaving other obligations and making the trip, which is worth something. Still, it is easier for the guest to have free time and be without the pressures of everyday life. Have you asked her how much time she has for the weekend? Perhaps it is difficult for her to give you the entire weekend but she has not said anything. Perhaps because of the new puppy the present time is not as good for a visit or a full weekend visit. Are you saturating her with your presence? Can you take things with you (books, computer, hobby or personal project, things you would otherwise do) to allow her her own time as have yours, and to give her room to want more of your time? Can you shorten your trip? What if instead of the weekend, you go down for a day (arrive Saturday morning, leave Sunday morning) so that both of you know you have limited time and that you will have time for your own activities? Do you like puppies? Can you participate in the puppy care so that it becomes a joint activity? I think it is always a good idea to compare notes on how each of you respectively expresses and feels submission and dominance, and a relationship in general. Is the play with the toys interesting to you because of the physical sensation the play creates, or because it is an expression of the D/s roles which can also be had through other means? Your reference to service suggests that you would be fine with other means of expressing the roles. Our decisions or how we feel about a matter are affected by the balance of rewards (eg, fulfilling BDSM and relationship wants with one to whom one is attracted) and costs (time and energy expended on the visit). BDSM wants are powerful and it is reasonable to say that one is more willing to endure costs because of this greater reward. If this greater reward is not being had, it is reasonable to say the costs will gain grounds for how one feels about the matter. Perhaps ideally a sub can ignore his wants and focus on the domme's wants only. Realistically, a sub has wants and unmet wants create a sense of being unfulfilled. I think a relationship is most healthy when wants of both persons are being addressed. Realistically, how eager and enthusiastic you will be to keep going back for the weekend depends on how much reward you find in the trips. If you are unfulfilled, it is fair and unselfish of you to say you are unfulfilled and this relationship or scenario is not for you. My two cents. Cheers, Sea
< Message edited by undergroundsea -- 9/10/2007 7:00:50 AM >
|