Mercnbeth -> RE: 24/7 Pitfalls and Pleasures? (9/12/2007 12:17:32 PM)
|
to servez, I'm glad you didn't see my post as an attack. In fact I thought your analogy of the "switch" was a perfect opportunity to once again make a point regarding my personal beliefs and how I've used it in the dynamic of my relationship. quote:
I know you always qualify it is your preference and I commend you on that. My comment is more on the term being self serving and very misrepresentative. THANKS for having that appreciation and with that in mind I'd love to continue this discussion with no "absolute" or "one true way" expressed or implied. quote:
I do not argue with your ability, preference and how it affects you to not have a slave work. I do take exception, not major, with your phrase “serving two masters”. Considering this position, let me pose a question that illustrates the problem of serving two 'masters'. I'll provide a "worst case" scenario - You work for me (no that's not the worst case!). You and your Master plan for 6 months to go to Folsom on the 30th. He's always wanted to go and he says that going with you fulfills a personal dream. Unknown to you, I'm also going, but I own the company and say you and I can't both be out of town at the same time. I say you have to stay in the office and if you go you're fired. At best you have a frustrating situation. At worse, you need the money and in this employment environment replacing your income/position is highly unlikely. Which "Master" do you serve? Admittedly its a baited question. But, in my opinion, there is a "right" answer - Don't allow the potential for the frustration to ever take place. I didn't want my slave put in that position. Basically that was my priority and what I had in mind long before I met beth. The manner of which we live isn't a contributing factor. Whether we are in a one room studio apartment or a mansion, no amount of money that my slave to contribute merits having an outside 'master' dictate to us. We represent we both "serve" our relationship, and our relationship serves nobody else but us. My comments are also "self serving" but are representative of how we live. I wish I can say I've managed to eliminate ALL outside 'masters' however issues of age, physical ability, and limited capital resources have me still dealing with the minor ones. I just happen to believe that outside employment is a major one, not a more "noble" one. Its not a question of prioritizing its a question as to why you should have to prioritize at all.
|
|
|
|