Drifa
Posts: 547
Joined: 7/27/2007 From: Rural Texas Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BeachMystress First of all, I have to say that the whole queening thing seem to be more of a male fantasy than a female one. I realize, reading over this, that I have no idea what "Queening" consists of... enlighten me, please? quote:
ORIGINAL: BeachMystress I was surprised to hear from some of them that they don't like oral sex ever. Top that off with the fact that while there are Domme who enjoy oral sex, many of you guys aren't that great at it. (I once found a guy who was AWESOME at oral sex and he became "famous" and in high demand among our friends.. Unless a man is THAT good or unless I'm willing to spend the many hours of teaching him what really works and what is dull for me, I didn't bother queening much. To be blunt, most men are better with fingers or penis than tongue.) While my Lady is exclusively lesbian, I myself am at least nominally bi (I've been with my Lady 14 years and no men during that time, aside from some online play). So for me, I *could* imagine some of the OP's scenario. But the idea of a guy wanting to provide "oral service" just leaves me cold. In general, the worst woman I've been with has been better than the average man at cunnilingus. I have known maybe two men who were halfway good at oral sex, and the best women I've had the pleasure to play with were so far better than the best guys that there is simply no comparison. And OMFG my Lady rocks my world in that department ;-) But since any dual domination would have to be something my Lady wanted, there's no way such a situation will ever arise in our life. quote:
ORIGINAL: BeachMystress I have a friend who served a pair of lesbian Domme for a time. He never has sex with his Dominant regardless of their sexual orientation (one of his hard limits) so that wasn't an issue. The problem was since neither woman liked men, they really were not interested in playing with a male (even though play HAD been negotiated.) I really don't like this either. My feeling is that if you have negotiated an agreement, you stick to the agreement. Otherwise these two gals just were being sadistic in a way that had not been agreed to, and that's a no-no in my book. Going back to the OP's post, quote:
ORIGINAL: Wilders It's being "adopted" by a lesbian couple as their sissy pet, being pushed further and further into emasculating situations, and being used as a sexual object (lots of queening and oral service). I just don't see any submission here. I see a bunch of "IT'S ALL ABOUT ME GETTING MY ROCKS OFF! ME ME ME ME!" Your fantasy is looking at what turns you on, sexually. But the scenario you're describing is a full time D/s thing. I don't see a submissive anywhere in your description. I see a man wanting to direct a porn film from the bottom. If in some alternate reality my Lady DID decide she wanted a male pet, he'd not be getting any sex anywhere. There would be a lot of service though. Really, what she wants is a farmhand. I'm right there with jolievoltaire: quote:
ORIGINAL: jolievoltaire But note that I am not the sort to keep sissy pets; I would rather more enjoy the presence of confident, well behaved, soldier-like male "submissives" (or bottoms or trainees) who like rough handling. I have no sexual desire for these fellows, but they are ideal male "submissives" for my lifestyle. As lesbians who grew up in the 50s and 60s, we've had to discard a LOT of social baggage about gender roles, "proper" behavior, and had to actually reclaim for ourselves being strong and assertive and ALSO keeping a lot of the good things about the feminine sterotype going. Neither me nor my lady like wimpy weak people. Yes, I am submissive. But I am also a strong, intelligent, capable woman. My submission has value because I am strong and because I choose each time to hand over control into my Lady's capable hands. I want my partners to all be sane, self-assured, confident, and emotionally strong. And none of our play involves humiliation, so there's that as well. Humiliating another isn't pleasing for us. Weak pathetic people begging for humiliation just don't light the old homefire at all.
|