Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Allan Greenspan


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> Allan Greenspan Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Allan Greenspan - 9/14/2007 10:38:04 PM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline
Its just hard to believe there hasn't been some kind of popular revolt. Greenspan is somewhat like George Tenet here, saving his criticisms until he's safely in retirement from his public duties.

>WASHINGTON, Sept. 14 — Alan Greenspan, who was chairman of the Federal Reserve for nearly two decades, in a long-awaited memoir, is harshly critical of President Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and the Republican-controlled Congress, as abandoning their party’s principles on spending and deficits.

In the 500-page book, “The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World,” Mr. Greenspan describes the Bush administration as so captive to its own political operation that it paid little attention to fiscal discipline, and he described Mr. Bush’s first two Treasury secretaries, Paul H. O’Neill and John W. Snow, as essentially powerless.

Mr. Bush, he writes, was never willing to contain spending or veto bills that drove the country into deeper and deeper deficits, as Congress abandoned rules that required that the cost of tax cuts be offset by savings elsewhere. “The Republicans in Congress lost their way,” writes Mr. Greenspan, a self-described “libertarian Republican.”<

>He praises President Bush for letting the Fed stay independent of political pressure, saying he was scrupulous in not trying to interfere with monetary policy — which he contrasts sharply with the pressure exerted by his father, George H. W. Bush, in the early 1990s. For years, the first President Bush has blamed Mr. Greenspan for contributing to his defeat in 1992 by failing to prevent a recession by cutting interest rates.

Of the presidents he worked with, Mr. Greenspan reserves his highest praise for Bill Clinton, whom he described in his book as a sponge for economic data who maintained “a consistent, disciplined focus on long-term economic growth.”<

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/15/business/15greenspan.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin

< Message edited by cloudboy -- 9/14/2007 10:39:30 PM >
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Allan Greenspan - 9/14/2007 10:51:50 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
it`s on my must read list

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Allan Greenspan - 9/14/2007 11:02:32 PM   
SusanofO


Posts: 5672
Joined: 12/19/2005
Status: offline
I sometimes have to wonder, how much money people think they really need to acquire -before some will quit a job, or publicy decry the actions of the boss or organization they work for, when they are seemingly entrusted with operating on behalf of the public, and they know what is happening (or likely will happen) is wrong, and might be (or are definitely) in a position to exert the pressure for positive change. It's possible that Greenspan thought he might make more positive difference by staying, rather than quitting in frustration.

IMO, he's a smart guy, very well-educated - and has also been incredibly personally wealthy for decades. It isn't as if he couldn't afford to lose the job, had he decided to publicly criticize the Bush administration to the extent it became an embarrassment for them (maybe he did a little, I can't seem to remember), even if it ended up meaning he had to resign.

IMO I think he isn't responsible for the entire functioning of U.S. economy (taking note of the "Housing Bubble bursting" and too many (initially low-interest) ARM mortgages on offer -IMO, very greedy banks, and also greedy consumers, brokers, adn realestate agents also figure in this equation, very much - no matter what "carrot" was dangled in front of their noses. People still make their own free spending decisions - although granted his policies played a part.  

Given Greenspan's situation (and some key assinine players in the Bush Presidential administration he seemed to be dealing with)- maybe he saw himself as simply being called on to make financial decisions that would simply cause more good than harm - even if the difference seemed negligible to him, at times.

So people will have to look at the balance of how that played out (and continues to play out) - as far as his low-interest rate fiscal policy outlook. But I've no doubt he knew just how much trust many people placed in his word and opinion on those matters.

In any case, he was ticked off enough about how things were in the Bush Administration when he was part of it, to write about it now (too little too late, possibly, that - plus he knows his book will make tons of money).

I agree - if someone in a highly-placed position like this in government, and is not worried about how their family will eat tommorrow (or maybe even if they are), or (in the case of many in Washington, D.C., I am guessing) they've already got more money than any one person is probably ever going to need, what would stop them (besides a wimpy belief in social convention) from being a lot more vocal in protesting how things are being run - while they are in office? Or simply leaving? Just walking away? - and making no bones about the reasons why?

Besides what I've already said, I dunno the answer. Good question. Maybe he can donate the proceeds from his book to help clean up the mess?

I agree that Clinton seems to have been (IMO) mentally, socially and organizationally much more capable (and accomplisehd a lot more that is positive in an ongoing sense, while in office) than the two Bush Presidents combined.

In the very far reaches of the back of my mind, I keep hoping against hope, that, say, 5 years after this Bush leaves office, I will read somewhere some information, that somewhat justifies more clearly some of the actions he has taken. I keep hoping -thinking there has just got to be a better explanation for someone appearing to have purposely made this much of a mess - like maybe there is just a lot of information I don't know, or that wasn't ever made public except to very few, or something, re: The reasons for some of these really bad decisions of his.

I think it is probably a vain hope - but it's been such an incredible debacle since he took office (particularly financially, and in terms of the war and all of its accompanying mis-management) - that part of me can't seem to believe (even though it is really happening) that someone actually has managed to be this incompetent a General Manager.

I just read more of the book excerpt (sounds like an itneresting book). Wow. Incredibly short-sighted (as well as pretty darned insulated) pretty much sums up my feelings about many Republican Reps and Senators, and especially Bush, since he took office, if what Greenspan says is true.

- Susan 

< Message edited by SusanofO -- 9/15/2007 12:02:01 AM >


_____________________________

"Hope is the thing with feathers,
That perches in the soul,
And sings the tune without the words,
And never stops at all". - Emily Dickinson

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Allan Greenspan - 9/14/2007 11:24:49 PM   
UtopianRanger


Posts: 3251
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy

Its just hard to believe there hasn't been some kind of popular revolt. Greenspan is somewhat like George Tenet here, saving his criticisms until he's safely in retirement from his public duties.

>WASHINGTON, Sept. 14 — Alan Greenspan, who was chairman of the Federal Reserve for nearly two decades, in a long-awaited memoir, is harshly critical of President Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and the Republican-controlled Congress, as abandoning their party’s principles on spending and deficits.

In the 500-page book, “The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World,” Mr. Greenspan describes the Bush administration as so captive to its own political operation that it paid little attention to fiscal discipline, and he described Mr. Bush’s first two Treasury secretaries, Paul H. O’Neill and John W. Snow, as essentially powerless.

Mr. Bush, he writes, was never willing to contain spending or veto bills that drove the country into deeper and deeper deficits, as Congress abandoned rules that required that the cost of tax cuts be offset by savings elsewhere. “The Republicans in Congress lost their way,” writes Mr. Greenspan, a self-described “libertarian Republican.”<

>He praises President Bush for letting the Fed stay independent of political pressure, saying he was scrupulous in not trying to interfere with monetary policy — which he contrasts sharply with the pressure exerted by his father, George H. W. Bush, in the early 1990s. For years, the first President Bush has blamed Mr. Greenspan for contributing to his defeat in 1992 by failing to prevent a recession by cutting interest rates.

Of the presidents he worked with, Mr. Greenspan reserves his highest praise for Bill Clinton, whom he described in his book as a sponge for economic data who maintained “a consistent, disciplined focus on long-term economic growth.”<

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/15/business/15greenspan.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin



While I agree with ''Bubbles'' Greenspan regards the current administration.....I find his fatherly ''holier than thou'' attitude laughable.

Greenspan's due diligence was single-handedly responsible for the Black Monday crash of 87. He's propped-up and rode every bubble since.  Starting with the Asian contagion through the dot com bubble, through the lending and housing bubbles - Now crash and hyper-inflation.

Instead of a Fed chairman who likens himself to the false-free market philosophy of Milton Friedman, now we have one who's a combination of Dr Jekyll and Mr. Hyde -- Ala Friedman / Keynes.



JMHO



 - R

< Message edited by UtopianRanger -- 9/14/2007 11:26:20 PM >


_____________________________

"If you are going to win any battle, you have to do one thing. You have to make the mind run the body. Never let the body tell the mind what to do... the body is never tired if the mind is not tired."

-General George S. Patton


(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Allan Greenspan - 9/14/2007 11:24:50 PM   
SugarMyChurro


Posts: 1912
Joined: 4/26/2007
Status: offline
The cookie jar is very addictive. Greenspan is laughing all the way to the bank - a bank he used to control. A bank with the license to print money. But by now his wealth is largely real property and lots of it is kept offshore. That's how you avoid the tax man legally.

And for those scoring at home: Clinton was basically a Republican. The Neocons are looters.

(in reply to SusanofO)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Allan Greenspan - 9/15/2007 12:04:05 AM   
SusanofO


Posts: 5672
Joined: 12/19/2005
Status: offline
This might be a redundant, familiar opinion, but I am so disappointed with the last couple of years in this Presidency, that I will say it anyway. I am not particularly materialistic, but I do end up wondering how much money people think they really need.

It seems obvious to me a whole different kind of culture is at play in the top echelons of government, in which not competence, but power matters most (IMO this happens all the time in the corporate world, too).

It might be nice if next time around, in 2008, we get the two to go together much more than we did this time, as far as who we as a country decide to elect as the next President.  

- Susan

< Message edited by SusanofO -- 9/15/2007 12:33:44 AM >


_____________________________

"Hope is the thing with feathers,
That perches in the soul,
And sings the tune without the words,
And never stops at all". - Emily Dickinson

(in reply to SusanofO)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Allan Greenspan - 9/15/2007 10:27:53 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
if greenspan sneeazed wall street would be in a friendzy. he is more crediable then his replacement.

(in reply to SusanofO)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Allan Greenspan - 9/15/2007 3:18:50 PM   
seeksfemslave


Posts: 4011
Joined: 6/16/2006
Status: offline
Susan my sweet, lol, I think you have missed the point of this thread, I've done it myself so you are in good company lol.

Its about government income/spending on the large scale. Not about individual wealth. Isn't it ?


(in reply to SusanofO)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Allan Greenspan - 9/15/2007 4:15:23 PM   
SugarMyChurro


Posts: 1912
Joined: 4/26/2007
Status: offline
seeksfemslave:

Not entirely, no.

(in reply to seeksfemslave)
Profile   Post #: 9
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> Allan Greenspan Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.063