Stephann -> RE: Advice (9/19/2007 9:00:00 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: lacylamour While I agree its very important to be sure of who you choose and that you are also ready to make that committment.I do not agree that you are the soul earner.A sub may provide household duties,but thats not all that they should provide. They should welcome the opportunity to also provide a certain income to the household. They should have their own health insurance depending on what country they live in. It also means they can provide their own personal items as in clothes and toiletries which would not be provided for if they were living a vanilla life other than by themselves. So why should a Dominant provide it for them either. Briefly, I'm not suggesting that the dominant must be the sole earner at all times. I'm suggesting that if the dominant is unable to become the sole earner should the situation should the need arise, they should think twice about the relationship. There is a strong D/s element in providing for one's home, I think, but even in a vanilla relationship things happen. Nothing rips a family apart faster than lack of money. My concern with the OP, is that it's not clear if she's financially self-sufficiant herself yet. This is an important element of the maturation process; if she cannot yet provide for herself fully, how is she going to handle providing for a slave? If anything, my fear is she might get wrapped up by the glamor and glitz of a sugar daddy, who wants to play slave... only to end up chucked out with the trash a few months or years later, when someone prettier and younger comes along. I just dont' think she's looked at all of the potential risks here. If she has, and decides to go for it, then I wish her the best of luck. Stephan
|
|
|
|