SimplyMichael -> RE: republican senators stab our GIs in the back,again.WTF?!! (9/22/2007 8:03:10 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: TheHeretic And wars have turned into slogging bloodbaths for a long time too. is that before or after "mission accomplished" or before the non existent insurgency existed, or what? quote:
Our leadership's definition of 'mission' has changed a bunch of times and suffers from flawed vision. Just what exactly do you think it means that the "mission" has changed over and over again? When a person does that, we know that all the surface reasons are BS and they have a hidden or unconcious agenda. Why do YOU think the mission keeps changing? quote:
The enemy's is quite clear. Prove to the masses that the US can be pushed around by random violence, that we lack the testicular fortitude to fight. Pushed around how and what exactly are we fighting them over? The Arabs are so pathetic they can't defeat Israel so as a threat to me, I can't help but just giggle. quote:
I'll take as "Victory" pretty much anything that denies that claim to them (best case, one that gets our guys the fuck out of there). Define in clear terms what you see as the least possible acceptable "victory" AND what you would be willing to pay in numbers of dead troops and debt. quote:
I believe the price of giving them that will be far higher than we ever want to pay. What are we "giving them" exactly? Everything we have done has strengthened our enemies and undermined our allies. China and Iran are stronger for our fucking up, Al Queda is stronger and has more support than ever. Our allies have distanced themselves from us. We are massively in debt. The troops are being overused, we are losing the best people and recruiting the worst, Pakistan is weaker than ever, radicals all over the ME are empowered and moderates undermined by our actions. So again, what exactly are we "giving them" that they don't want?
|
|
|
|